Skip to main content
Log in

Stress–strain State of Multiwall Carbon Nanotube Under Internal Pressure

  • Published:
Journal of Nanoparticle Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A considered application of carbon nanotubes is nanopiping in nanofluidic devices. The use of nanotubes for fluid transport requires large-diameter tubes that can sustain prescribed loading without failure. Two models of the stress–strain state of long multiwall carbon nanotubes, subjected to internal pressure, are described. Cylindrical nanotubes having a Russian doll structure have been considered. It is assumed that the deformations are linear elastic and negligible along the tube axis (in comparison with the radial deformations). This assumption is not restrictive for potential applications of nanotubes, where their deformations must be small and reversible. The distance between the layers is small in comparison to the radii of curvature of graphite layers. In the case of several carbon layers, a discrete model (DM) is proposed. The solutions of DM equations, with corresponding boundary conditions, determine the stresses between the layers, the forces in the layers, and the deformation of the layers. For the case of thick walls built of numerous carbon layers, a continuous model (CM) is proposed. The main CM equation is the Euler's differential equation with corresponding boundary conditions. Its solution defines the continuous distribution of the stresses and strains across the wall thickness of the tube.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bacon R., 1960. Growth, structure and properties of graphite whiskers. J. Appl. Phys. 31, 283–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns M.A., B.N. Johnson, S.N. Brahmasandra, K. Handique, J.R. Webster, M. Krishnan, T.S. Sammarco, P.M. Man, D. Jones, D. Heldsinger, C.H. Mastrangelo & D.T. Burke, 1998. An integrated nanoliter DNA analysis device. Science 282, 484–487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delamarche E., A. Bernard, H. Schmid, B. Michel & H. Biebuyck, 1997. Patterned delivery of immunoglobulins to surfaces using microfluidic networks. Science 276, 779–781.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dresselhaus M.S., G. Dresselhaus & P.C. Eklund, 1996. Science of Fullerenes and Carbon Nanotubes. Academic Press.

  • Ebbesen T.W., 1997. Carbon Nanotubes: Preparation and Properties. CRC Press, Boca Raton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadd G.E., M. Blackford, D. Moricca, N. Webb, P.J. Evans, A.M. Smith, G. Jacobsen, S. Leung, A. Day & Q. Hua, 1997. The world's smallest gas cylinders. Science 277, 933–936.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gere J.M. & S.P. Timoshenko, 1997, Mechanics of Materials. PWS Publishing, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gogotsi Y., J.A. Libera, A.F.K.v. Groos & M. Yoshimura, 2001a. In: Joint Sixth International Symposium on Hydrothermal Reactions (ISHR)& Fourth International Conference on Solvo-Thermal Reactions (ICSTR). Kochi, Japan, 350–355.

  • Gogotsi Y., J.A. Libera, A.Güvenc¸-Yazicioglu & C.M. Megaridis, 2001b. In-situ multi-phase fluid experiments in hydrothermal carbon nanotubes. Appl. Phys. Lett. 79, 1021–1023.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gogotsi,Y., J.A. Libera & M.Yoshimura, 2001c. In: Osawa E. ed. Perspectives of Fullerene Nanotechnology. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 253–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris P.J.F., 1999. Carbon Nanotubes and Related Structures. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iijima S., 1994. Carbon nanotubes. MRS Bull. 19, 43–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jo B.-H., V. Lerberghe, L.M. Motsegood, M. Kathleen & D.J. Beebe, 2000. Three-dimensional micro-channels fabrication in polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) elastomer. J. Microelectromech. Systems 9, 76–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Libera J.A. & Y. Gogotsi, 2001. Hydrothermal synthesis of graphite tubes using Ni catalyst. Carbon 39, 1307–1318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruoff R.S. & D.C. Lorents, 1995. Mechanical and thermal properties of carbon nanotubes. Carbon 33, 925–930.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulz W., 2000. Crafting a national nanotechnology effort. C&EN 2000, 39–42.

  • Smirnov V.I., 1958. A Course of Higher Mathematics. Fizmatgiz, Moscow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ugarte D., A. Chatelain & W.A. DeHeer, 1996. Nanocapillarity and chemistry in carbon nanotubes. Science 274, 1897–1899.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ugural A.C., 1999. Stresses in Plates and Shells. McGraw-Hill, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong E.W., P.E. Sheehan & C.M. Lieber, 1997. Nanobeam mechanics: Elasticity, strength, and toughness of nanorods and nanotubes. Science 277, 1971–1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wuu D.-S., R.-H. Horng, C.-C. Chan & Y.-S. Lee, 1999. Plasmadeposited amorphous silicon carbide films for micromachined fluidic channels. Appl. Surf. Sci. 144–45, 708–712.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yakobson B.I., G. Samsonidze & G.G. Samsonidze, 2000. Atomistic theory of mechanical relaxation in fullerene nanotubes. Carbon 38, 1675–1680.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Galanov, B., Galanov, S. & Gogotsi, Y. Stress–strain State of Multiwall Carbon Nanotube Under Internal Pressure. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 4, 207–214 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019955916151

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019955916151

Navigation