Skip to main content
Log in

Competition between birds and mammals: A comparison of giving-up densities between crested larks and gerbils

  • Published:
Evolutionary Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We combined the concept of mechanisms of co-existence with the approach of giving-up densities to study inter-taxon competition between seed-eating birds and mammals. We measured feeding behaviour in food patches to define and study the guild of seed-eating vertebrates occupying sandy habitats at Bir Asluj, Negev Desert, Israel. Despite a large number of putatively granivorous rodents and birds at the site, two gerbil species (Allenby's gerbil, Gerbillus allenbyi, and the greater Egyptian gerbil, G. pyramidum) dominated nocturnal foraging, and a single bird species (crested lark, Galerida cristata) contributed all of the daytime foraging. We used giving-up densities to quantify foraging behaviour and foraging efficiencies. A low giving-up density demonstrates the ability of a forager to profitably harvest food at low abundances and to profitably utilize the foraging opportunities left behind by the less efficient forager. Gerbils had lower giving-up densities in the bush than open microhabitat, and lower giving-up densities in the semi-stabilized than stabilized sand habitats. Crested larks showed the opposite: lower giving-up densities in the open than bush, and on the stabilized than semi-stabilized sand habitats. Despite these patterns, gerbils had substantially lower giving-up densities than crested larks in both microhabitats, all sand habitats, and during each month. Several mechanisms may permit the crested lark to co-exist with the gerbils. Larks may be cream skimmers on the high spatial and temporal variability in seed abundances. Larks may rely on insects, fruit or smaller seeds. Or, larks may rely on adjacent rocky habitats.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abramsky, Z. and Pinshow, B. (1989) Changes in foraging effort in two gerbil species with habitat type and intra-and interspecific activity. Oikos 56, 43–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abramsky, Z., Brand, S. and Rosenzweig, M.L. (1985) Geographical ecology of gerbilline rodents in the sand dune habitats of Israel. J. Biogeogr. 12, 363–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abramsky, Z., Rosenzweig, M.L., Pinshow, B., Brown, J.S., Kotler, B.P. and Mitchell, W.A. (1990) Habitat selection: An experimental field test with two gerbil species. Ecology 71, 2358–2369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abramsky, Z., Rosenzweig, M.L. and Pinshow, B. (1991) The shape of a gerbil isocline measured using principles of optimal habitat selection. Ecology 72, 329–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benkman, C.W. (1991) Predation, seed size partitioning, and the evolution of body size in seed-eating finches. Evol. Ecol. 5, 118–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouskila, A. (1995) Interaction between predation risk and competition: A field study of kangaroo rats and snakes. Ecology 76, 165–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, M.A., Jefferson, J.L. and Kuebler, M.G. (1993) Variation in giving-up densities of foraging chipmunks (Tamias striatus) and squirrels (Sciurus carolinensis). Oikos 66, 229–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J.H. and Davidson, D.W. (1977) Competition between seed-eating rodents and ants in desert ecosystems. Science 196, 880–882.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J.H., Reichman, O.J. and Davidson, D.W. (1979) Granivory in desert ecosystems. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 10, 201–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J.H., Kodric-Brown, A., Witham, T.G. and Bond, H.W. (1981) Competition between hummingbirds and insects for the nectar of two species of shrubs. Southwest. Nat. 26, 133–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J.H., Davidson, D.W., Munger, J.C. and Inouye, R.C. (1986) Experimental community ecology: The desert granivore system. In Community Ecology (J.L. Diamond and T.J. Case, eds), pp. 41–61. Harper and Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J.S. (1986) Coexistence on a resource whose abundance varies: A test with desert rodents. PhD thesis, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J.S. (1988) Patch use as an indicator of habitat preference, predation risk, and competition. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 22, 37–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J.S. (1989) Desert rodent community structure: A test of four mechanisms of coexistence. Ecol. Monogr. 20, 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J.S. (1992) Patch use under predation risk: I. Models and predictions. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 29, 301–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J.S. and Alkon, P.U. (1990) Testing values of crested porcupine habitats by experimental food patches. Oecologia (Berl.) 83, 512–518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J.S. and Morgan, R.A. (1995) Effects of foraging behavior and spatial scale on diet selectivity: A test with fox squirrels. Oikos 74, 122–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J.S. and Rosenzweig, M.L. (1986) Habitat selection in slowly regenerating environments. J. Theor. Biol. 123, 151–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J.S., Kotler, B.P., Smith, R.J. and Wirtz, W.O., II (1988) The effects of owl predation on the foraging behavior of heteromyid rodents. Oecologia (Berl.) 76, 408–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J.S., Arel, Y., Abramsky, Z. and Kotler, B.P. (1992a) Patch use by gerbils (Gerbillus allenbyi) in sandy and rocky habitats. J. Mammal. 73, 821–829.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J.S., Morgan, R.A. and Dow, B.D. (1992b) Patch use under predation risk: II. A test with fox squirrels, Sciurus niger. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 29, 311–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J.S., Kotler, B.P. and Mitchell, W.A. (1994a) Forging theory, patch use, and the structure of a Negev Desert granivore community. Ecology 75, 2286–2300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J.S., Kotler, B.P. and Valone, T.J. (1994b) Foraging under predation: A comparison of energetic and predation costs in a Negev and Sonoran Desert rodent community. Austr. J. Zool. 42, 435–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brownlee, K.A. (1965) Statistical Theory and Methodology in Science and Engineering, 2nd edn. John Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caraco, T. (1979) Time budgeting and group size: A theory. Ecology 60, 611–617.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnov, E.L. (1976) Optimal foraging and the marginal value theorem. Theor. Pop. Biol. 9, 129–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cody, M.L. (1974) Competition and the Structure of Bird Communities. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cody, M.L. (ed.) (1985) Habitat Selection in Birds. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colwell, R.K. and Fuentes, E.R. (1975) Experimental studies of the niche. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 6, 281–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig, W. (1982) Enemy at the Gates: The Battle for Stalingrad. Bantam Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D.W., Inouye, R.S. and Brown, J.H. (1984) Granivory in a desert ecosystem: Evidence for indirect facilitation of ants by rodents. Ecology 65, 1780–1786.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dayton, P.K. (1971) Competition, disturbance, and community organization: The provision and subsequent utilization of space in a rocky intertidal community. Ecol. Monogr. 41, 351–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J.B. (1986) Shrub-steppe bird assemblages revisited: Implications for community theory. Am. Nat. 128, 82–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fryxell, J.M. and Lundberg, P. (1994) Diet choice and predator-prey dynamics. Evol. Ecol. 8, 407–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe, H.F. (1980) Monkey dispersal and waste of a neotropical fruit. Ecology 61, 944–959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe, H.F. (1990) Seed dispersal by birds and mammals: Implications for seedling demography. In Reproductive Ecology of Tropical Plants (K.S. Bawa and M. Hadley, eds), pp. 191–218. Man and Biosphere Series Vol. 7. UNESCO, Paris and Parthenon Publishing, Carnforth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, J.J. and Ward, D. (1993) Predation risk and distance to cover affect foraging behaviour in Namib Desert gerbils. Anim. Behav. 46, 1243–1245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, J.J., Ward, D. and Perrin, M.R. (1994) Predation risk and competition affect habitat selection and activity of Namib Desert gerbils. Ecology 75, 1397–1405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, J.J., Ward, D. and Perrin, M.R. (1995) Effects of substrate on foraging decisions by a Namib Desert gerbil. J. Mammal. 76, 638–645.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inouye, R.S. (1981) Interactions among unrelated species: Granivorous rodents, a parasitic fungus, and a shared prey species. Oecologia (Berl.) 49, 425–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jedlicka, D. (1993) A foraging approach to habitat selection in time and space in three sciurid rodents. PhD dissertation, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotler, B.P. and Brown, J.S. (1988) Environmental heterogeneity and the coexistence of desert rodents. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 19, 281–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotler, B.P. and Brown, J.S. (1990) Harvest rates of two species of gerbilline rodents. J. Mammal. 71, 591–596.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotler, B.P., Brown, J.S., Smith, R.J. and Wirtz, W.O., II (1988) The effects of morphology and body size on rates of owl predation on desert rodents. Oikos 53, 145–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotler, B.P., Brown, J.S. and Hasson, O. (1991) Owl predation on gerbils: The role of body size, illumination, and habitat structure on rates of predation. Ecology 72, 2249–2260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotler, B.P., Brown, J.S. and Mitchell, W.A. (1993a) Environmental factors affecting patch use in two species of gerbilline rodents. J. Mammal. 74, 614–620.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotler, B.P., Brown, J.S. and Subach, A. (1993b) Mechanisms of species coexistence of optimal foragers: Temporal partitioning by two species of sand dune gerbils. Oikos 67, 548–556.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreuger, K. (1986) Feeding relationships among bison, pronghorn, and prairie dogs: An experimental analysis. Ecology 67, 760–770.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lima, S.L. (1992) Strong preference for apparently dangerous habitats? A consequence of differential escape from predators. Oikos 64, 597–600.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lima, S.L. (1993) Ecological and evolutionary perspectives on escape from predatory attack: A survey of North American birds. Wil. Bull. 105, 1–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubchenco, J. and Menge, B.A. (1978) Community development and persistence in a low rocky intertidal zone. Ecol. Monogr. 59, 67–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur, R.H. (1958) Population ecology of some warblers of northeastern coniferous forests. Ecology 39, 599–619.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur, R. and Pianka, E. (1966) On optimal use of a patchy environment. Am. Nat. 100, 603–609.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNaughton, S.J. (1993) Grasses and grazers, science and management. Ecol. Appl. 3, 17–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, W.A., Abramsky, Z., Kotler, B.P., Pinshow, B.P. and Brown, J.S. (1990) The effect of inter-and intra-specific competition on foraging effort: Theoretical development and a test with granivorous desert rodents in Israel. Ecology 71, 844–854.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, R.A. (1994) Using giving-up densities to investigate search images, functional responses and habitat selection. PhD thesis, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, D.W., Abramsky, Z., Fox, B.J. and Willig, M.R. (eds) (1989) Patterns in the Structure of Mammalian Communities. Special Publication No. 28 of the Museum, Texas Technical University, Lubbock, TX.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morse, D.H. (1981) Interactions among syrphid flies and bumblebees on flowers. Ecology 62, 81–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paine, R.T. (1966) Food web complexity and species diversity. Am. Nat. 100, 65–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, M.V. and Jenkins, S.H. (1986) Rodents as seed consumers and dispersers. In Seed Dispersal (D. Murray, ed.), pp. 242–261. Academic Press Australia, North Ryde.

    Google Scholar 

  • Root, R. (1967) The niche exploitation pattern of the blue-grey gnatcatcher. Ecol. Monogr. 37, 317–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig, M.L. (1966) Community structure in sympatric carnivores. J. Mammal. 47, 602–620.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig, M.L. (1981) A theory of habitat selection. Ecology 62, 327–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shkedy, J. (1990) Niche breadth and geographical distribution of the Desert Lark (Ammomanes deserti) and the Crested Lark (Galerida cristata). PhD dissertation, Hebrew University, Jerusalem.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shkedy, J. (1992) Niche breadth of two lark species in the desert and the size of their geographical range. Ornis Scand. 23, 89–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shkedy, Y. and Safriel, U.N. (1991) Fat reserves of an opportunist and of a specialist species in the Negev Desert. Auk 108, 556–561.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R.J. (1991) Predation risk and the community organization of montane ground squirrels and a phylogenetic test of association between diurnal activity and gregarious behavior in mammals. PhD dissertation, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R.J. (1995) Harvest rates and escape speeds in two coexisting species of montane ground squirrels. J. Mammal. 76, 189–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sohonen, J., Halonen, M. and Mappes, T. (1993) Predation risk and the organization of the Parus guild. Oikos 66, 94–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, F.M. and Levin, B.R. (1973) Partitioning of resources and the outcome of interspecific competition: A model and some general considerations. Am. Nat. 107, 171–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terborgh, J. (1983) Five New World Primates: A Study in Comparative Ecology. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terborgh, J., Robinson, S.K., Parker T.A., III, Munn, C.A. and Pierpont, N. (1990) Structure and organization of an Amazonian forest bird community. Ecol. Monogr. 60, 213–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, D.B., Brown, J.H. and Spencer, W.D. (1991) Indirect facilitation of granivorous birds by desert rodents: Experimental evidence from foraging patterns. Ecology 72, 852–863.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilman, D. (1982) Resource Competition and Community Structure. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turkington, R. and Harper, J.L. (1979) The growth, distribution, and neighbor relationship of Trifolium repens in a permanent pasture: Fine-scale biotic differentiation. J. Ecol. 62, 245–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valone, T.J. and Brown, J.S. (1989) Measuring patch assessment abilities of desert granivores. Ecology 70, 1800–1810.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vance, R.R. (1985) The stable coexistence of two competitors for one resource. Am. Nat. 126, 72–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, E.E. (1992) Individual behavior and higher-order species interactions. Am. Nat. 140, S5–S32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziv, Y., Abramsky, Z., Kotler, B.P. and Subach, A. (1993) Interference competition and temporal partitioning in two gerbil species. Oikos 66, 237–246.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brown, J.S., Kotler, B.P. & Mitchell, W.A. Competition between birds and mammals: A comparison of giving-up densities between crested larks and gerbils. Evolutionary Ecology 11, 757–771 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018442503955

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018442503955

Navigation