Skip to main content
Log in

Investigating the community consequences of competition among clonal plants

  • Published:
Evolutionary Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although clonal plants comprise most of the biomass of several widespread ecosystems, including many grasslands, wetlands, and tundra, our understanding of the effects of clonal attributes on community patterns and processes is weak. Here we present the conceptual basis for experiments focused on manipulating clonal attributes in a community context to determine how clonal characteristics affect interactions among plants at both the individual and community levels. All treatments are replicated at low and high density in a community density series to compare plant responses in environments of different competitive intensity. We examine clonal integration, the sharing of resources among ramets, by severing ramets from one another and comparing their response to ramets with intact connections. Ramet aggregation, the spacing of ramets relative to each other, is investigated by comparing species that differ in their natural aggregation (either clumped growth forms, with ramets tightly packed together, or runner growth forms, with ramets loosely spread) and by planting individual ramets of all species evenly spaced throughout a mesocosm. We illustrate how to test predictions to examine the influence of these two clonal traits on competitive interactions at the individual and community levels. To evaluate the effect of clonal integration on competition, we test two predictions: at the individual level, species with greater clonal integration will be better individual-level competitors, and at the community level, competition will cause a greater change in community composition when ramets are integrated (connected) than when they are not. For aggregation we test at the individual level: clumped growth forms are better competitors than runner growth forms because of their ability to resist invasion, and at the community level: competition will have a greater effect on community structure when ramets are evenly planted. An additional prediction connects the individual- and community-level effects of competition: resistance ability better predicts the effects of competition on relative abundance in a community than does invasion ability. We discuss additional experimental design considerations as revealed by our ongoing studies. Examining how clonal attributes affect both the individual- and community-level effects of competition requires new methods and metrics such as those presented here, and is vital to understanding the role of clonality in community structure of many ecosystems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Abrams, P.A. (1987) Indirect interactions between species that share a predator: varieties of indirect effects. In W.C. Kerfoot and A. Sih (eds) Predation: Direct and Indirect Impacts on Aquatic Communities. University Press of New England, Hanover, New Hampshire, pp. 38-54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ågren, G.I. and Fagerström, T. (1984) Limiting dissimilarity in plants: randomness prevents exclusion of species with similar competitive ability. Oikos 43, 369-375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, W.D. and Shorrocks, B. (1981) Competition on a divided and ephemeral resource: a simulation model. J. Anim. Ecol. 50, 461-471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Begon, M. and Wall, R. (1987) Individual variation and competitor coexistence: a model. Func. Ecol. 1, 237-241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, A.D. (1984) Dynamic morphology: a contribution to plant population ecology. In R. Dirzo and J. Sarukhan (eds) Perspectives on Plant Population Ecology. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, Massachusetts, pp. 48-65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergelson, J. (1990) Life after death: site pre-emption by the remains of Poa annua. Ecology 71, 2157-2165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheplick, G.P. (1997) Responses to severe competitive stress in a clonal plant: differences between genotypes. Oikos 79, 581-591.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Kroon, H. (1993) Competition between shoots in stands of clonal plants. Plant Species Biol. 8, 85-94.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Kroon, H. and Van Groenendael, J. (eds) (1997) The Ecology and Evolution of Clonal Plants. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaudet, C.L. and Keddy, P.A. (1995) Competitive performance and species distribution in shoreline plant communities: a comparative approach. Ecology 76, 280-291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, D.E. (1987) Neighborhood competition in an old-field plant community. Ecology 68, 1211-1223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, D.E. (1990) Components of resource competition in plant communities. In J.B. Grace and D. Tilman (eds) Perspectives in Plant Competition. Academic Press, San Diego, California, pp. 27-49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, D.E. (1994) On testing the importance of competition for community structure. Ecology 75, 1503-1506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, D.E. and Landa, K. (1991) Competitive effect and response: hierarchies and correlated traits in the early stages of competition. J. Ecol, 79, 1013-1030.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, D.E., Turkington, R. and Olsvig-Whittaker, L. (1995) Quantifying the community-level effects of competition. Folia Geobotanica and Phytotaxonomica 30, 231-242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grace, J.B., Guntenspergen, G.R. and Keough, J. (1993) The examination of a competitive matrix for transitivity and intransitive loops. Oikos 68, 91-98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grime, J.P., Hodgson, J.G. and Hunt, R. (1990) The Abridged Comparative Plant Ecology. Unwin Hyman, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartnett, D.C. and Bazzaz, F.A. (1985) The integration of neighborhood effects by clonal genets of Solidago canadensis. J. Ecol. 73, 415-428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herben, T.H. (1995) Founder and dominance control: neglected concepts in the community dynamics of clonal plants. Abst. Bot. 19, 3-10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herben, T. and Hara, T. (1997) Competition and spatial dynamics of clonal plants. In H. de Kroon and J. van Groenendael (eds) The Ecology and Evolution of Clonal Plants. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, pp. 331-358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hershock, C. and Goldberg, D.E. (2001) Community-level consequences of competition among clonal sedges. Abstract of the 86th Annual Meeting of the Ecological Society of America, August 5–10, 2001, Madison, Wisconsin.

  • Huber-Sannwald, E., Pyke, D.A. and Caldwell, M.M. (1997) Perception of neighboring plants by rhizomes and roots: morphological manifestations of a clonal plant. Can. J. Bot. 75, 2146-2157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey, L.D. and Pyke, D.A. (1998) Demographic and growth responses of a guerrilla and a phalanx perennial grass in competitive mixtures. J. Ecol. 86, 854-865.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huston, M. (1979) A general hypothesis of species diversity. Am. Nat. 113, 81-101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchings, M.J. and Bradbury, I.K. (1986) Ecological perspectives on clonal perennial herbs. BioScience 36, 178-182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchings, M.J. and Price, E.A.C. (1993) Does physiological integration enable clonal herbs to integrate the effects of environmental heterogeneity? Plant Species Biol. 8, 95-105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jónsdóttir, I.S. and Watson, M.A. (1997) Extensive physiological integration: an adaptive trait in resource-poor environments? In H. de Kroon and J. van Groenendael (eds) The Ecology and Evolution of Clonal Plants. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, pp. 109-136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keddy, P.A., Twolan-Strutt, L. and Wisheu, I.C. (1994) Competitive effect and response rankings in 20 wetland plants: are they consistent across three environments? J. Ecol. 82, 635-643.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klimeš, L., Klimešová, J., Hedriks, R. and van Groenendael, J. (1997) Clonal plant architecture: a comparative analysis of form and function. In H. de Kroon and J. van Groenendael (eds) The Ecology and Evolution of Clonal Plants. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, pp. 1-30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laska, M.S. and Wootton, J.T. (1998) Theoretical concepts and empirical approaches to measuring interaction strength. Ecology 79, 461-476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovett Doust, L. (1981) Population dynamics and local specialization in a clonal perennial (Ranunculus repens). I. The dynamics of ramets in contrasting habitats. J. Ecol. 69, 743-756.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pacala, S.W. (1986) Neighborhood models of plant population dynamics. 2. Multispecies models of annuals. Theor. Popul. Biol. 29, 262-292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pacala, S.W. and Levin, S.A. (1997) Biologically generated spatial pattern and the coexistence of competing species. In D. Tilman and P. Kareiva (eds) Spatial Ecology. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, pp. 204-232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitelka, L.F. and Ashmun, J.W. (1985) Physiology and integration of ramets in clonal plants. In J.B.C. Jackson, L.W. Buss and R.E. Cook (eds) Population Biology and Evolution of Clonal Organisms Yale University Press, New Haven, pp. 399-443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, E.A.C. and Marshall, C. (1999) Clonal plants and environmental heterogeneity. Plant Ecol. 141, 3-7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid, B. (1985) Clonal growth in grassland perennials II. Growth form and fine-scale colonizing ability. J. Ecol. 73, 809-818.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid, B. and Harper, J.L. (1985) Clonal growth in grassland perennials I. Density and pattern-dependent competition between plants with different growth forms. J. Ecol. 73, 793-808.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shmida, A. and Ellner, S. (1984) Coexistence of plant species with similar niches. Vegetatio 58, 29-55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silvertown, J., Holtier, S., Johnson, J. and Dale, P. (1992) Cellular automaton models of interspecific competition for space -- the effect of pattern on process. J. Ecol. 80, 527-534.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoll, P. and Prati, D. (2001) Intraspecific aggregation alters competitive interactions in experimental plant communities. Ecology 82, 319-327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuefer, J.F., During, H.J. and de Kroon, H. (1994) High benefits of clonal integration in two stoloniferous species, in response to heterogeneous light environments. J. Ecol. 82, 511-518.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Groenendael, J.M. and de Kroon, H. (eds) (1990) Clonal Growth in Plants: Regulation and Function. SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, J. and Conte, P.T. (1981) Dispersal and neighborhood effects in an annual plant community. Ecol. Model. 13, 131-147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wijesinghe, D.K. and Handel, S.N. (1994) Advantages of clonal growth in heterogeneous habitats: an experiment with Potentilla simplex. J. Ecol. 82, 495-502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, S.D. and Tilman, D. (1993) Plant competition and resource availability in response to disturbance and fertilization. Ecology 74, 599-611.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winkler, E., Fischer, M. and Schmid, B. (1999) Modelling the competitiveness of clonal plants by complementary analytical and simulation approaches. Oikos 85, 217-233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zobel, M. (1992) Plant species coexistence -- the role of historical, evolutionary and ecological factors. Oikos 65: 314-320.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gough, L., Goldberg, D.E., Hershock, C. et al. Investigating the community consequences of competition among clonal plants. Evolutionary Ecology 15, 547–563 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016061604630

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016061604630

Navigation