Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Mesoscale distribution of understorey plants in temperate forest (Kalø, Denmark): the importance of environment and dispersal

  • Published:
Plant Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We studied the influence of environmental heterogeneity and dispersalprocesses on mesoscale distribution patterns of understorey plants in a 330ha ancient, managed temperate forest area. Similarity matrixregression analysis showed that overall species similarity was affected bysite(the two disjunct halves of the forest area), spatial autocorrelation at the100m scale, edaphic conditions, stand type and stand structure, andthe occurrence of open areas, but not by stand age or topography. Usingautologistic regression we analysed the influence of clumping, site, edaphicconditions, stand composition, open areas, and stand structure on theindividualdistribution patterns of the 60 most abundant species. Only five species haddistributions that were not significantly related to any of the explanatoryvariables. A large number of species showed significant, and often differing,relationships to at least one of the environmental parameters. At least 20species exhibited clumping at the 100 m scale that was independentof the environmental parameters. Principal coordinate analysis and an analysisusing the Ellenberg ecological indicator values suggested that no importantgradients had been overlooked. Dispersal ability (estimated from dispersalmode)and clumping independent of environmental heterogeneity were related. Poordispersers exhibited stronger clumping at the 100 m scale thangooddispersers. Our results support the joint importance of environmentalheterogeneity and dispersal processes in shaping the mesoscale distributionpatterns of forest herbs. We conclude that the distribution of plant species,and species coexistence and species composition in plant communities, cannot beexplained without simultaneously considering environmental heterogeneity anddispersal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amezaga I. and Onaindia M. 1997. The effect of evergreen and deciduous coniferous plantations on the field layer and seed bank of native woodlands. Ecography 20: 308-318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beatty S.W. 1984. Influence of microtopography and canopy species on spatial patterns of forest understory plants. Ecol. 65: 1406-1419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bossuyt B., Hermy M. and Deckers J. 1999. Migration of herbaceous plant species across ancient-recent forest ecotones in central Belgium. J. Ecol. 87: 628-638.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown J.H. 1984. On the relationship between abundance and distribution of species. Am. Naturalist 124: 255-279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunet J. and von Oheimb G. 1998. Migration of vascular plants to secondary woodlands in southern Sweden. J. Ecol. 86: 429-438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruun H.H. and Fritzbøger B. 1999. Historiske forandringer i hus-dyrbruget har medført faldende artsrigdom i skove, enge og overdrev. URT 23: 84-97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cadenasso M.L. and Pickett S.T.A. 2000. Linking forest edge structure to edge function: mediation of herbivore damage. J. Ecol. 88: 31-44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cain M.L., Damman H. and Muir A. 1998. Seed dispersal and the Holocene migration of woodland herbs. Ecol. Monographs 68: 325-347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casgrain P. 1998. Permute! version 3.4 alpha. User's manual. Départment de sciences biologiques, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casgrain P. and Legendre P. 2000. The R package for Multivariate and Spatial Analysis. Version 4.0 (development release 2). User's Manual. Département de sciences biologiques, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark D.B., Clark D.A. and Read J.M. 1998a. Edaphic variation and mesoscale distribution of tree species in a neotropical rain forest. J. Ecol. 86: 101-112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark J.S., Macklin E. and Wood L. 1998b. Stages and spatial scales of recruitment limitation in southern Appalachian forests. Ecol. Monographs 68: 213-235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark D.B., Palmer M.W. and Clark D.A. 1999a. Edaphic factors and the landscape-scale distributions of tropical rain forest trees. Ecol. 80: 2662-2675.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark J.S., Silman M., Kern R., Macklin E. and HilleRisLambers J. 1999b. Seed dispersal near and far: patterns across temperate and tropical forests. Ecol. 80: 1475-1494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Condit R., Ashton P.S., Baker P., Bunyavejchewin S., Gunatilleke S., Gunatilleke N. et al. 2000. Spatial patterns in the distribution of tropical tree species. Science 288: 1414-1418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell J.H. 1978. Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs. Science 199: 1302-1310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornell H.V. and Lawton J.H. 1992. Species interactions, local and regional processes, and limits to the richness of ecological communities: a theoretical perspective. J. Animal Ecol. 61: 1-12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawley M.J. 1997. The structure of plant communities. In: Crawley M.J. (ed.), Plant Ecology. Blackwell Scientific Ltd., Oxford, pp. 475-531.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donohue K., Foster D.R. and Motzkin G. 2000. Effects of the past and the present on species distribution: land-use history and demography of wintergreen. J. Ecol. 88: 303-316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlén J. and Eriksson O. 2000. Dispersal limitation and patch occupancy in forest herbs. Ecol. 81: 1667-1674.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellenberg H. 1988. Vegetation Ecology of Central Europe. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson O. 1996. Regional dynamics of plants: a review of evidence for remnant, source-sink and metapopulations. Oikos 77: 248-258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson O. and Ehrlén J. 1992. Seed and microsite limitation of recruitment in plant populations. Oecol. 91: 360-364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson O. and Jacobsson A. 1998. Abundance, distribution and life histories of grassland plants: a comparative study of 81 species. J. Ecol. 86: 922-933.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falinski J.B. 1986. Vegetation Dynamics in Temperate Lowland Primeval Forests - Ecological Studies in Bialowieza Forest. Dr W. Junk Publishers, Dordrecht, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graae B.J. 2000. The impact of forest continuity on the flora in Danish deciduous forests. phd, University of Copenhagen.

  • Graae B.J. The effect of landscape fragmentation and forest continuity on forest floor species in two regions of Denmark. J. Veget. Sci. (in press).

  • Graae B.J. and Sunde P.B. 2000. The impact of forest continuity and management on forest floor vegetation evaluated by species traits. Ecography 23: 720-731.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granat H.J. 1994. Lokalitetskortlægning af Hestehave Skov og Ringelmose Skov ved Kalø. Internal Report # 20. Geological Insitute, Laboratory of Physical Geography, University of Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grashof-Bokdam C.J. and Geertsema W. 1998. The effect of isolation and history on colonization patterns of plant species in secondary woodland. J. Biogeography 25: 837-846.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanley T.A. and Brady W.W. 1996. Understory species composition and production in old-growth western hemlock - Sitka spruce forest of southeastern Alaska. Can. J. Botany 75: 574-580.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen K. (ed.) 1984. Dansk Feltflora. Gyldendalske Boghandel, Nordisk Forlag A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark.

  • Hanski I. 1998. Metapopulation dynamics. Nature 396: 41-49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hensher D.A. and Johnson L.W. 1981. Applied Discrete-Choice Modelling. Halsted Press, a Division of John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermy M., Honnay O., Firbank L., Grashof-Bokdam C. and Lawesson J. 1999. An ecological comparison between ancient and other forest plant species of Europe, and the implications for forest conservation. Biol. Conservation 91: 9-22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honnay O., Hermy M. and Coppin P. 1999. Impact of habitat quality on forest plant species colonization. Forest Ecol. Manag. 115: 157-170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbell S.P. 1997. A unified theory of biogeography and relative species abundance and its application to tropical rain forests and coral reefs. Coral Reefs 16: S9-S21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbell S.P. and Foster R.B. 1986. Biology, chance, and history of tropical rain forest tree communities. In: Diamond J. and Case T.J. (eds), Community Ecology. Harper & Row Publishers, New York, pp. 314-329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbell S.P., Foster R.B., O'Brien S.T., Harms K.E., Condit R., Wechsler B. et al. 1999. Light-gap disturbances, recruitment limitation, and tree diversity in a Neotropical forest. Science 283: 554-557.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurtt G.C. and Pacala P.W. 1995. The consequences of recruitment limitation: reconciling chance, history and competitive differences between plants. J. Theor. Biol. 176: 1-12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kadmon R. and Shmida A. 1990. Spatiotemporal demopgraphic processes in plant populations: an approach and a case study. Am. Naturalist 135: 382-397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirby K.J. 1988. Changes in the ground flora under plantations in ancient woodland sites. Forestry 61: 317-338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legendre P., Lapointe F.-J. and Casgrain P. 1994. Modeling brain evolution from behaviour: a permutation regression approach. Evolution 48: 1487-1499.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legendre P. and Legendre L. 1998. Numerical Ecology. Developments in Environmental Modelling. Elsevier, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legendre P. and Vaudor A. 1991. The R Package: Multidimensional Analysis, Spatial Analysis. Départment de sciences biologiques, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehman C.L. and Tilman D. 1997. Competition in spatial habitats. In: Tilman D. and Kareiva P. (eds), Spatial Ecology: The Role of Space in Population Dynamics and Interspecific Interactions. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, pp. 185-203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matlack G.R. 1994a. Plant species migration in a mixed-history forest landscape in eastern North America. Ecol. 75: 1491-1502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matlack G.R. 1994b. Vegetation dynamics of the forest edge - trends in space and successional time. J. Ecol. 82: 113-123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meier A.J., Bratton S.P. and Duffy D.C. 1995. Possible ecological mechanisms for loss of vernal-herb diversity in logged eastern deciduous forests. Ecol. Applic. 5,: 935-946.

    Google Scholar 

  • Motzkin G., Wilson P., Foster D.R. and Allen A. 1999. Vegetation patterns in heterogenous landscapes: The importance of history and environment. J. Veget. Sci. 10: 903-920.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nathan R. and Muller-Landau H.C. 2000. Spatial patterns of seed dispersal, their determinants and consequences for recruitment. Trends Ecol. Evol. 15: 278-285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer M.W. 1990. Spatial scale and patterns of species-environment relationships in hardwood forests of the North Carolina Piedmont. Coenoses 5: 79-87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterken G.F. 1996. Natural Woodland: Ecology and Conservation in Northern Temperate Regions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterken G.F. and Game M. 1984. Historical factors affecting the number and distribution of vascular plant species in the woodlands of central Lincolnshire. J. Ecol. 72: 155-182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Primack R.B. and Miao S.L. 1992. Dispersal can limit local plant distribution. Conservat. Biol. 6: 513-519.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed R.A., Peet R.K., Palmer M.W. and White P.S. 1993. Scale dependence of vegetation-environment correlations: a case study from a North Carolina piedmont woodland. J. Veget. Sci. 4: 329-340.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute 1994. JMP Statistics and Graphics Guide. Version 3 of JMP. SAS Institute Inc., Cary.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheiner S.M. and Rey-Benayas J.M. 1997. Placing empirical limits on metapopulation models for terrestrial plants. Evol. Ecol. 11: 275-288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shmida A. and Ellner S. 1984. Coexistence of plant species with similar niches. Vegetatio 58: 29-55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skov F. 1997. Stand and neighbourhood parameters as determinants of plant species richness in a managed forest. J. Veget. Sci. 8: 573-578.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skov F. 2000. Distribution of plant functional attributes in a managed forest in relation to neighbourhood structure. Plant Ecol. 146: 121-130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skov F., Berthelsen J.P., Andersen T.Q., Asferg T., Carstensen H., Christensen M. et al. 1997. Basismonitering af Kaløskovene 1993. Arbejdsrapport fra DMU nr. 45. Danmarks Miljøundersøgelser, Kalø, Denmark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith P.A. 1994. Autocorrelation in logistic regression modelling of species' distributions. Glob. Ecol. Biogeog. Letters 4: 47-61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svenning J.-C. 1999. Microhabitat specialization in a species-rich palm community in Amazonian Ecuador. J. Ecol. 87: 55-65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svenning J.-C. 2001. Environmental heterogeneity, recruitment limitation, and the mesoscale distribution of palms in a tropical montane rain forest (Maquipucuna, Ecuador). J. Trop. Ecol. 17: 97-113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D. 1994. Competition and biodiversity in spatially structured habitats. Ecol. 75: 2-16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D. 1997. Community invasibility, recruitment limitation, and grassland biodiversity. Ecol. 78: 81-92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turnbull L.A., Crawley M.J. and Rees M. 2000. Are plant populations seed-limited? A review of seed sowing experiments. Oikos 88: 225-238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitney C.G. and Foster D.R. 1988. Overstorey composition and age as determinants of the understorey flora of woods of central New England. J. Ecol. 76: 867-876.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willson M.F. 1993. Dispersal mode, seed shadows, and colonization patterns. Vegetatio 107/108: 261-280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu H. 1994. Regression models for spatial binary data with application to the distribution of plant species. phd, Department of Statistics, Florida State University, Gainesville.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu H. and Huffer F.W. 1997. Modelling the distribution of plant species using the autologistic regression model. Envir. Ecol. Statistics 4: 49-64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wulf M. 1997. Plant species as indicators of ancient woodland in northwestern Germany. J. Veget. Sci. 8: 635-642.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zar J.H. 1996. Biostatistical Analysis. Prentice Hall Inc, Upper Saddle River, New Jersy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zobel M. 1997. The relative role of species pools in determining plant species richness: an alternative explanation of species co-existence? Trends Ecol. Evol. 12: 266-269.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Unit 0948, APO AA 34002-0948, USA

    Jens-Christian Svenning

  2. Department of Landscape Ecology, National Environmental Research Institute, Kalø Grenaavej 12, Rønde, DK–8410, Denmark

    Flemming Skov

Authors
  1. Jens-Christian Svenning
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Flemming Skov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Svenning, JC., Skov, F. Mesoscale distribution of understorey plants in temperate forest (Kalø, Denmark): the importance of environment and dispersal. Plant Ecology 160, 169–185 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015885321263

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015885321263

Search

Navigation