Skip to main content
Log in

Regulating Water Quantity and Quality in Irrigated Agriculture: Learning by Investing under Asymmetric Information

  • Published:
Environmental Modeling & Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An input-based incentive approach for controlling an agricultural non-point source pollution problem is developed. A regulatory agency designs a tax scheme and an investment policy to increase its informational base, in order to obtain the desirable water use and emissions for a set of agricultural producers whose individual water use and emissions cannot be observed without costly monitoring. The agency invests in order to increase observability of water use and emissions, and taxes the observed variables. Learning effects enhance the process of acquiring information about the individual producers' behavior. The optimal tax scheme and the cost minimizing monitoring program are determined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. K. Arrow and M. Kurz, Public Investment, the Rate of Return and Optimal Fiscal Policy (Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, 1970).

  2. R. Barro and X. Sala-i-Martin, Economic Growth (McGraw-Hill, 1995).

  3. W. Boggess, E. Flaig and R. Fonyo, Florida's experience with managing nonpoint source phosphorus runoff in lake Okeechobee, in: Theory, Modeling, and Experience in the Management of Nonpoint-Source Pollution, eds. C. Russell and J. Shogren (Kluwer Academic, Boston, MA, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  4. J.B. Braden and K. Segerson, Informational problems in the design of nonpoint source pollution policy, in: Theory, Modeling, and Experience in theManagement of Nonpoint-Source Pollution, eds. C. Russell and J. Shogren (Kluwer Academic, Boston, MA, 1993) p. 1–36.

    Google Scholar 

  5. M.R. Caputo, How to do comparative dynamics on the back of an envelope in optimal control theory, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 14 (1990) 655–683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. A. Dinar, Measuring knowledge production of an agricultural research system, Technological Forecasting and Social Change 40 (1991) 249–259.

    Google Scholar 

  7. A. Dinar and J. Letey, Modeling Economic, Management and Policy Issues in Irrigated Agriculture (Praeger, Connecticut, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. Dinar and A. Xepapadeas, Regulating water quantity and quality in irrigated agriculture, Journal of Environmental Management 54 (1998) 273–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. J.W. Dunn and J.S. Shortle, Agricultural nonpoint-source pollution control in theory and practice, Marine Resource Economics 5 (1988) 259–270.

    Google Scholar 

  10. H. Farzin and J. Kaplan, Nonpoint source pollution control under incomplete and costly information, FEEM Working Papers No. 32 (1999).

  11. C. Fershtman and S. Nitzan, Dynamic voluntary provisions of public goods, European Economic Review 35 (1991) 1057–1067.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. D. Garvie and A. Keeler, Incomplete enforcement with endogenous regulatory choice, Journal of Public Economics 55 (1994) 141–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. R.C. Griffin and D.W. Bromely, Agricultural runoff as a nonpoint externality: A theoretical development, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 64(3) (1982) 547–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. R.W. Hexem and E.O. Heady, Water Production functions for Irrigated Agriculture (Iowa State Univ. Press, Ames, IA, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  15. J.T. LaFrance and L.D. Barney, The envelope theorem in dynamic optimization, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 15 (1991) 355–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. A.S. Malik, Permanent versus interim regulations: A game theoretic analysis, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 21 (1991) 127–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. E. Mansfield, Intrafirm rates of diffusion on an innovation, Review of Economics and Statistics 45 (1963) 348–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. D.W. Nordhaus, Invention, Growth and Welfare: A Theoretical Treatment of Technical Change (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  19. OECD Environmental Policy: How to Apply Economic Instruments, Paris (1991).

  20. M. Ribaudo, Water quality benefits from the conservation reserve program, Agricultural Economic report No. 606, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC, February 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  21. K. Segerson, Uncertainty and incentives for nonpoint pollution control, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 15 (1988) 87–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. A. Seierstad and K. Sydsaeter, Optimal Control Theory with Economic Applications (North-Holland, 1987).

  23. A.P. Xepapadeas, Environmental policy design and dynamic nonpoint-source pollution, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 23 (1992) 22–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. A. Xepapadeas, Non-point source pollution control, in: The Handbook of Environmental and Resource Economics, ed. J. van den Bergh (Edward Elgar, 1999).

  25. A. Xepapadeas, Observability and choice of instrument mix in the control of externalities, Journal of Public Economics 56 (1995) 485–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dinar, A., Xepapadeas, A. Regulating Water Quantity and Quality in Irrigated Agriculture: Learning by Investing under Asymmetric Information. Environmental Modeling & Assessment 7, 17–27 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015265912341

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015265912341

Keywords

Navigation