Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Friendship Networks and Delinquency: The Relative Nature of Peer Delinquency

  • Published:
Journal of Quantitative Criminology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although acknowledging the importance of adolescent friendships in the etiology of delinquency, prior studies have yet to provide a detailed examination of the role of actual friendship networks in delinquency. Using data from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (1995–1996), this study's incorporation of friendship networks allows for a more rigorous conceptualization and measurement of peer delinquency based on carefully defined networks of adolescent friendships. Findings illustrate that friendship networks are very heterogenous in terms of members' participation in delinquent behavior with the majority of adolescents belonging to networks containing both delinquent and non-delinquent friends. In support of differential association's premise that delinquent behavior is influenced by the ratio of definitions favorable to those unfavorable to law violation (Sutherland, 1947), the proportion of delinquent friends in a respondent's network is most strongly associated with respondents' subsequent delinquency. This relative measure of peer delinquency is preferable to a measure of the absolute level of delinquency occurring by friends, the average delinquency committed by friends, or the absolute number of delinquent friends. Enmeshment in a friendship network where consensus about the appropriateness of delinquency is maximized (i.e., all friends are delinquent or non-delinquent) most effectively constrains the behaviors of network members to resemble the groups' behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Akers, R. (1985). Deviant Behavior: A Social Learning Approach, Wadsworth, Belmont, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akers, R. (1998). Social Learning and Social Structure, A General Theory of Crime and Deviance, Northeastern University Press, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akers, R. L, Krohn, M., Lonza-Kaduce, L., and Radosevich, M. (1979). Social learning and deviant behavior: A specific test of a general theory. American Sociological Review V44: 636-655.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aseltine Jr., Robert. (1995). A reconsideration of parental and peer influences on adolescent deviance. J. Health and Social Behavior V36: 103-121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bearman, P. S., Jones, J., and Udry, J. R. (1997). The National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health: Research Design. <URL:http://www.cpc.unc.edu/projects/addhealth/design.html>

  • Bellair, P. E. (1997). Social interaction and community crime: Examining the importance of neighbor networks. Criminology V35: 677-704.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berndt, T. J. (1992). Friendship and friends' influence in adolescence. Current Directions in Psychological Science V1: 156-159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Best, R. (1983). We've All Got Scars, Indiana University Press, Bloomington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blythe, D. A., Hill, J. P., and Thiel, K. S. (1982). Early adolescent's significant others: Grade and gender differences in perceived relationships with familial and nonfamilial adults. J. Youth and Adolescence V11: 425-445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bott, E. (1957). Family and Social Networks, Tavistock, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bukowski, W., Hoza, B., and Boivin, M. (1994). Measuring friendship quality during pre-and early-adolescence. J. Social and Personal Relationships V11: 471-484.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cairns and Cairns. (1995). Lifelines and Risk: Pathways of Youth in Our Time, Cambridge University Press, NY, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chantala, K., and Tabor, J. (1999). Strategies to perform a design-based analysis using the add health data. URL: http://www.cpc.unc.edu/projects/addhealth/strategies/design.html

  • Cohen, J. M. (1977). Sources of peer group homogeneity. Sociology of Education V50: 227-241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. (1961). The Adolescent Society: The Social Life of the Teenager and Its Impact on Education, The Free Press of America.

  • Coleman, J. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. Am. J. Sociol. V94: 95-120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. (1990). Foundations of Social Theory, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dishion, T. (2000). Cross-setting consistency in early adolescent psychopathology: Deviant friendships and problem behaviors. J. Personality V68: 1109-1127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dishion, T., Capaldi, D., Spracklen, K., and Li, E. (1995). Peer ecology of male adolescent drug use. Development and Psychopathology V7: 803-824.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dishion, T., and McCord, J. (1999). When interventions harm. American Psychologist V54: 755-765.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dishion, T., and Patterson, G. R. (1991). Family, school, and behavioral antecedents to early adolescent involvement with antisocial peers. Developmental Psychology V27: 172-181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eder, D. (1985). The cycle of popularity: Interpersonal relations among female adolescents. Sociology of Education V58 (July): 154-165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, D., Huizinga, D., and Ageton, S. (1985). Explaining Delinquency and Drug Use, Sage: Beverly Hills, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, D., Huizinga, D., and Menard, S. (1989). Multiple Problem Youth: Delinquency, Substance Use, and Mental Health Problems, Springer-Verlag, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott D., and Menard, S. (1991). Delinquent Friends and Delinquent Behavior: Temporal and Developmental Patterns, The Institute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado, CO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, D., and Menard, S. (1996). Delinquent friends and delinquent behavior: Temporal and developmental patterns. In Hawkins, J. D. (ed.), Delinquency and Crime: Current Theories. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ennett, S., Bailey, S., and Federman, B. (1999). Social network characteristics associated with risky behaviors among runaway and homeless youth. J. Health and Social Behavior V40: 63-78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, W., Mulvey, E. P., and Shaw, E. C. (1995). Regression analyses of counts and rates: Poisson, overdispersed poisson, and negative binomial models. Psychological Bulletin V118(3): 392-404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giordano, P., Cernkovich, S., and Pugh, M. (1986). Friendships and delinquency. Am. J. Sociol. V91: 1170-1202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giordano, P., Cernkovich, S., and Demaris, A. (1993). The Family and Peer Relations of Black Adolescents. Journal of Marriage and the Family V55: 277-288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, H. (1987). Multilevel Models in Education and Social Research, Oxford University Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson, D., and Gottfredson, G. D. (1996). A multimodel school-based prevention demonstration. J. Adolescent Research V11: 97-116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson, D., and McNeil, R. (1991). Social area influences in delinquency: A multilevel analysis. J. Research in Crime and Delinquency V28: 197-234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson, M. R., and Hirschi, T. (1990). A General Theory of Crime, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, J. A., and Cohen, R. (1997). Race and sex as factors in children's sociometric ratings and friendship choices. Social Development V6: 353-370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. Am. J. Sociol. V81: 1287-1303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. Am. J. Sociol. V91: 481-510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallinan, M. T., and Teixeira, R. A. (1987). Student's interracial friendships: Individual characteristics, structural effects, and racial differences. Am. J. Educ. V95: 563-583.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haynie, D. L. (2001). Delinquent peers revisited: A network approach for understanding adolescent delinquency. Am. J. Sociol. V106: 1013-1057.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckman, J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 45: 153-161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschi, T. (1969). Causes of Delinquency, University of CA Press, Berkeley, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, G. F. (1972). Parents, peers and delinquency action: A test of the differential association perspective. Am. J. Sociol. V78: 562-575.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jussim, L., and Osgood, D. W. (1989). Influence and similarity among friends: An integrated model applied to incarcerated adolescents. Social Psychology Quarterly V52(2): 98-112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kandel, D. B. (1978). Homophily, selection, and socialization in adolescent friendships. Am. J. Sociol. V84: 427-436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kandel, D. B. (1996). The parental and peer contexts of adolescent deviance: An algebra of interpersonal influences. J. Drug Use V26: 289-316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapferer, B. (1969). Normas and the manipulation of relationships in a work context. In Mitchell, J. (ed.), Social Networks in Urban Settings, Manchester University Press, Manchester, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krackhardt, D., Blythe, J., and McGrath, C. (1995). KrackPlot: An improved network drawing program. Connections V17: 53-55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krohn, M. D. (1974). An investigation of the effect of parental and peer associations on marijuana use: An empirical test of differential association theory. In Riedel, M. and Thornberry, T. P. (eds.), Crime and Delinquency: Dimensions of Deviance (pp. 75-87). Praeger, NY, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krohn, M. D. (1986). The web of conformity: A network approach to the explanation of delinquent behavior. Social Problems V33: 601-613.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krohn, M., Massey, J. L., and Zielinski, M. (1988). Role overlap, network multiplexity, and adolescent deviant behavior. Social Psychology Quarterly V51(4): 346-356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krohn, M., and Thornberry, T. (1993). Network theory: A model for understanding drug abuse among African-American and Hispanic youth. In De La Rosa, M. R. and Juan-Luis Recio, A. (eds.) Drug Abuse Among Minority Youth: Advances in Research and Methodology. NIDA Research Monograph 130, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

  • Krohn, M., Lizotte, A. J., Thornberry, T. P., Smith, C., and McDowall, D. (1996). Reciprocal causal relationships among drug use, peers, and beliefs: A five-wave panel model. Journal of Drug Issues V26: 405-428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, V. E., and Bryk, A. S. (1989). A multilevel model of the social distribution of High School achievement. Sociology of Education V62: 172-192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsueda, R. L. (1982). The dynamics of moral beliefs and minor deviance. Social Forces V68: 428-457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsueda, R. L., and Anderson, K. (1998). The dynamics of delinquent peers and delinquent behavior. Criminology V36(21): 269-299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsueda, R. L., and Heimer, K. (1987). Race, family structure, and delinquency: A test of differential association and social control. America Sociological Review V52: 826-846.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, B., and Hagan, J. (1995). Getting into street crime: The structure and process of criminal embeddedness. Social Science Research V24(1): 63-95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menard S., and Morse, B. J. (1984). A structuralist critique of the IQ-delinquency hypothesis.

  • Messerschmidt, J. W. (2000). Nine Lives: Adolescent Masculinities, the Body and Violence,. Westview Press, Boulder, CO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moody, J. (1999). The Structure of Adolescent Social Relations: Modeling Friendship in Dynamic Social Settings. Dissertation, UNC: Chapel Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osgood, W. D. (1999). Poisson based regression analysis of aggregate crime rates. Pennsylvania Working Paper Series #99-04.

  • Osgood, W. D., Wilson, J. K., Bachman, J. G., O'Malley, P. M., and Johnston, L. D. (1996). Routine activities and individual deviant behavior. American Sociological Review V61: 635-655.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, G. R., DeBaryshe, B., and Ramsey, E. (1989). A developmental perspective on antisocial behavior. American Psychologist V44: 329-335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raudenbush, S. W., and Bryk, A. S. (1986). A hierarchical model for studying school effects. Sociology of Education V59: 1-79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. J. (1988). Local friendship ties and community attachment in mass society: A multi-level systemic model. American Sociological Review V53: 766-779.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. J., and Groves, W. B. (1989). Community structure and crime: Testing socialdisorganization theory.' Am. J. Sociol. V94: 774-802.

    Google Scholar 

  • Short, J. F. (1957). Differential association and delinquency. Social Problems V4: 233-239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steffensmeier, D., and Allen, E. (1996). Gender and crime: Towards a gendered theory of female offending. Annual Review of Sociology V22: 459-487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolzenberg, R. and Relles, D. (1990). Theory testing in a world of constrained research design: The significance of Heckman's censored sampling bias correction for nonexperimental research. Sociological Methods and Research V18: 395-415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, E. H. (1947). Principles of Criminology, 4th Edition. J. P. Lippincolt, Philadelphia, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornberry, T. (1987). Toward an interactional theory of delinquency. Criminology V25: 863-891.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornberry, T., Lizotte, A., Krohn, M., Farnworth, M., and Joon Jang, S. (1994). Delinquent peers, beliefs, and delinquent behavior: A longitudinal test of interactional theory. Criminology V32(1): 47-80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voss, H. (1964). Differential association and containment theory: A theoretical convergence. Social Forces V47: 381-391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitaro, F., Tremblay, R., Kerr, M., Pagani, L., and Bukowski, W. (1997). Disruptiveness, friends' characteristics, and delinquency in early adolescence. Child Development V68: 676-689.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warr, M., and Stafford, M. (1991). The influence of delinquent peers: What they think or what they do. Criminology V29: 851-865.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welsh, W. (1999). School disorder: The influence of individual, institutional and community factors. Criminology V37: 73-117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welsch, W., Stokes, R., and Greene, J. (2000). A macro-level model of school disorder. J. Research in Crime and Delinquency V37: 243-284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, L., and Messner, S. F. (2000). The effects of alternative measures of delinquent peers on self-reported delinquency. J. Research in Crime and Delinquency V37: 323-337.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Sociology, The Ohio State University, 300 Bricker Hall, 190 N. Oval Mall, Columbus, OH, 43210

    Dana L. Haynie

Authors
  1. Dana L. Haynie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Haynie, D.L. Friendship Networks and Delinquency: The Relative Nature of Peer Delinquency. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 18, 99–134 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015227414929

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015227414929

Search

Navigation