Skip to main content
Log in

Optimal Size in the Waste Collection Sector

  • Published:
Review of Industrial Organization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the cost structure of a sample of Italian wastecollection firms in order to assess economies of scale and density and, therefore, definethe optimal size of the firms. A total and a variable translog cost function were estimated using panel data for a sample of 30 firms operating at the provincial level over the period 1991–1995.

The empirical evidence suggests that franchised monopoly, rather than side-by-sidecompetition, is the most efficient form of production organization in the waste collection industry. Further, the majority of firms are not operating at optimal scale.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Antonioli, B., Fazioli, and M. Filippini (2000) ‘Analisi dei rendimenti di scala per il servizio di igiene urbana in Italia’, in Economie delle fonti dell'Energia e dell'ambiente, n. 2.

  • Barten, A. P. (1969) ‘Maximum Likelihood Estimation of a Complete System of Demand Equations’, European Economic Review, 1, 25–29.

  • Caves, W. C., L. R. Christensen, and M. W. Tretheway (1984) Economies of Density versus Economies of Scale: Why Trunk and Local Service Airline Costs Differ, Rand Journal of Economics, 15, 471–489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, L. R., and W. H. Greene (1976) ‘Economies of Scale in U.S. Electric Power Generation’, Journal of Political Economy, 84, 665–675.

    Google Scholar 

  • CISPEL (1997) Annuario Ufficiale Economico-Statistico.

  • Cornes, R. (1992) Duality and Modern Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Filippini, M. (1998) ‘Are Municipal Electricity Distribution Utilities Natural Monopolies?’, Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 2, 157–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Filippini, M., and R. Maggi (1993) ‘Efficiency and Regulation in the Case of the Swiss Private Railways’, Journal of Regulatory Economics 5, 199–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedlaender, A. F., and J. Shaw-Er Wang Chiang (1983) ‘Productivity Growth in the Regulated Trucking Industry’, Research in Transportation and Economics, 1, 149–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sbandati, A., and S. Cima (1999) L'economia dei rifiuti solidi urbani, Franco Angeli

  • Stevens, B. J. (1977) ‘Scale, Market Structure, and the Cost of Waste Collection’, The Review of Economics and Statistic, 60, 438–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tickner, G., and J. McDavid (1986) ‘Effects of Scale and Market Structure on the Costs of Residential Solid Waste Collection in Canadian Cities’, Public Finance Quarterly, 14, 371–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zellner, A. (1962) ‘An Efficient Method of Estimating Seemingly Unrelated Regressions and Test for Aggregation Bias’, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58, 348–368.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Antonioli, B., Filippini, M. Optimal Size in the Waste Collection Sector. Review of Industrial Organization 20, 239–252 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015043524679

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015043524679

Navigation