Skip to main content
Log in

Measuring the Quality of Faculty and Administrative Worklife: Implications for College and University Campuses

  • Published:
Research in Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There seems to be a presumption that the quality of worklife on college and university campuses has declined for faculty and administrative staff. What is not known is how generally true this is perceived to be, to what extent the quality of worklife varies by campus, and for what reasons it varies. Most importantly, it is not clear what impact the quality of worklife of faculty and staff members has on their performance or retention. The following article reviews the recent empirical literature devoted to this topic and offers a framework that conceptualizes these studies in three groups: those that describe and explore differences in the quality of worklife, those that determine the impact of worklife on attitudes, and those that attempt to explain behavioral outcomes. The implications of this work for practice and policy on college and university campuses is discussed. The author argues that campus leaders who want to improve the performance and retention of faculty and administrative staff must identify and address the particular issues that matter to those employed on their campuses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Aguirre Jr., A., Hernandez, A., and Martinez, R. O. (1994). Perceptions of the workplace: Focus on minority women faculty. Initiatives 56(3): 41-50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Astin, H. (1997). Race and Ethnicity in the American Professoriate, 1995-96. Los Angeles: University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Higher Education Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, L. B., Agago, M. O., and Coombs, W. T. (1998). Effects of job-related stress on faculty intention to leave academia. Research in Higher Education 39(4): 457-469.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bieber, J. P., Lawrence, J. H., and Blackburn, R. T. (1992). Through the years-Faculty and their changing institution. Change, July/August, 28-35.

  • Blackburn, R. T., and Bentley, R. J. (1993). Faculty research productivity: Some moderators of associated stressors. Research in Higher Education 34(6): 725-745.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn, R. T., and Lawrence, J. H. (1995). Faculty at Work: Motivation, Expectation, Satisfaction. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boice, R. (1993). New faculty involvement for women and minorities. Research in Higher Education 34(3): 291-341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, H. R., and Schuster, J. H. (1986). American Professors: A National Resource Imperiled. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, E. L., Altbach, P. G., and Whitelaw, M. (1994). The Academic Profession: An International Perspective. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, J. S., and Gmelch, W. H. (1995). Stress factors and occupational roles of department chairs. The Journal of Technology of Studies 21(1): 12-23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairweather, J. S. (1996). Faculty Work and Public Trust: Restoring the Value of Teaching and Public Service in American Academic Life. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein, M. J., Seal, R. K., and Schuster, J. H. (1998). The New Academic Generation: A Profession in Transition. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagedorn, L. S. (1994). Retirement proximity's role in the prediction of satisfaction in academe. Research in Higher Education 35(6): 711-728.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagedorn, L. S. (1996). Wage equity and female faculty job satisfaction: The role of wage differentials in a job satisfaction causal model. Research in Higher Education 37(5): 569-598.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnsrud, L. K. (1996). Maintaining Morale: A Guide to Assessing the Morale of Midlevel Administrators and Faculty. Washington, DC: College and University Personnel Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnsrud, L. K., and Atwater, C. D. (1994). Barriers to the retention and tenure of women and minorities: The case of a university's faculty. Review of Higher Education 17(4): 335-353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnsrud, L. K., and Heck, R. H. (1994). A university's faculty: Predicting those who will stay and those who leave. Journal for Higher Education Management 10(1): 71-84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnsrud, L. K., and Heck, R. H. (1998). Faculty worklife: Establishing benchmarks across groups. Research in Higher Education 39(5): 539-555.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnsrud, L. K., Heck, R. H., and Rosser, V. J. (2000). Morale matters: Midlevel administrators and their intent to leave. Journal of Higher Education 71(1): 34-59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnsrud, L. K., and Rosser, V. J. (1999). College and university mid-level administrators: Explaining and improving their morale. Review of Higher Education 22(2): 121-141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnsrud, L. K., and Rosser, V. J. (forthcoming). Faculty members' morale and their intentions to leave: A multilevel explanation. Journal of Higher Education, 73(4): July-August 2002.

  • Johnsrud, L. K., and Sadao, K. C. (1998). The common experience of “Otherness”: Ethnic and racial minority faculty. Review of Higher Education 21(4): 315-342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lease, S. H. (1999). Occupational role stressors, coping, support, and hardiness as predictors of strain in academic faculty: An emphasis on new and female faculty. Research in Higher Education 40(3): 285-307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luce, J. A., and Murray, J. P. (1998). New faculty's perceptions of the academic work life. New Forum Press 15(3): 103-110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, K. M. (1983). Leaders in Transition-A National Study of Higher Education Administrators. University Park: Center for the Study of Higher Education, Pennsylvania State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakanishi, D. T. (1993). Asian Pacific Americans in higher education: Faculty and administrative representation and tenure. In J. Gainen and R. Boice (eds.), Building a Diverse Faculty, pp. 51-59. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, D., Maple, S. A., and Stage, F. K. (1995). Women and minority faculty job satisfaction: Professional role interests, professional satisfactions, and institutional fit. Journal of Higher Education 66(3): 267-293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, D., and Near, J. P. (1994). Role conflict and faculty life satisfaction. Review of Higher Education 17(2): 179-195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, R. P., Clifton, R. A., Menec, V. H., Struthers, C. W., and Menges, R. J. (2000). Faculty in transition: A longitudinal analysis of perceived control and type of institution in the research productivity of newly hired faculty. Research in Higher Education 41(2): 165-194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, R. E., Sorcinelli, M. D., and Austin, A. E. (2000). Heeding New Voices: Academic Careers for a New Generation. New Pathways Inquiry #7. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, R. A. (1978). Lords, Squires and Yeoman: Collegiate Middle managers and Their Organizations. AAHE-ERIC/Higher Education Research Report no. 7. Washington, DC: American Association of the Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smart, J. C. (1990). A causal model of faculty turnover intentions. Research in Higher Education 31(5): 405-424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E., Anderson, J. L., and Lovrich, N. P. (1995). The multiple sources of workplace stress among land-grant university faculty. Research in Higher Education 36(3): 261-282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, C. S. V., and Myers, Jr., S. L. (2000). Faculty of Color in Academe: Bittersweet Success. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vander Putten, J., McLendon, M. K., and Peterson, M. W. (1997). Comparing union and nonunion staff perceptions of the higher education work environment. Research in Higher Education 38(1): 131-147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volkwein, J. F., Malik, S. M., and Napierski-Prancl, M. (1998). Administrative satisfaction and the regulatory climate at public universities. Research in Higher Education 39(1): 43-63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volkwein, J. F., and Parmley, K. (2000). Comparing administrative satisfaction in public and private universities. Research in Higher Education 41(1): 95-116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolverton, M., Gmelch, W. H., Wolverton. M. L., and Sarros, J. C. (1999a). A comparison of department chair tasks in Australia and the United States. Higher Education 38: 333-350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolverton, M., Gmelch, W. H., Wolverton. M. L., and Sarros, J. C. (1999b). Stress in academic leadership: U.S. and Australian department chairs/heads. The Review of Higher Education 22(2): 165-185.

  • Wolverton, M., Wolverton, M. L., and Gmelch, W. H. (1999). The impact of role conflict and ambiguity on academic deans. Journal of Higher Education 70(1): 80-106.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Linda K. Johnsrud.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Johnsrud, L.K. Measuring the Quality of Faculty and Administrative Worklife: Implications for College and University Campuses. Research in Higher Education 43, 379–395 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014845218989

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014845218989

Navigation