Abstract
There seems to be a presumption that the quality of worklife on college and university campuses has declined for faculty and administrative staff. What is not known is how generally true this is perceived to be, to what extent the quality of worklife varies by campus, and for what reasons it varies. Most importantly, it is not clear what impact the quality of worklife of faculty and staff members has on their performance or retention. The following article reviews the recent empirical literature devoted to this topic and offers a framework that conceptualizes these studies in three groups: those that describe and explore differences in the quality of worklife, those that determine the impact of worklife on attitudes, and those that attempt to explain behavioral outcomes. The implications of this work for practice and policy on college and university campuses is discussed. The author argues that campus leaders who want to improve the performance and retention of faculty and administrative staff must identify and address the particular issues that matter to those employed on their campuses.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Aguirre Jr., A., Hernandez, A., and Martinez, R. O. (1994). Perceptions of the workplace: Focus on minority women faculty. Initiatives 56(3): 41-50.
Astin, H. (1997). Race and Ethnicity in the American Professoriate, 1995-96. Los Angeles: University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Higher Education Research Institute.
Barnes, L. B., Agago, M. O., and Coombs, W. T. (1998). Effects of job-related stress on faculty intention to leave academia. Research in Higher Education 39(4): 457-469.
Bieber, J. P., Lawrence, J. H., and Blackburn, R. T. (1992). Through the years-Faculty and their changing institution. Change, July/August, 28-35.
Blackburn, R. T., and Bentley, R. J. (1993). Faculty research productivity: Some moderators of associated stressors. Research in Higher Education 34(6): 725-745.
Blackburn, R. T., and Lawrence, J. H. (1995). Faculty at Work: Motivation, Expectation, Satisfaction. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Boice, R. (1993). New faculty involvement for women and minorities. Research in Higher Education 34(3): 291-341.
Bowen, H. R., and Schuster, J. H. (1986). American Professors: A National Resource Imperiled. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Boyer, E. L., Altbach, P. G., and Whitelaw, M. (1994). The Academic Profession: An International Perspective. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
Burns, J. S., and Gmelch, W. H. (1995). Stress factors and occupational roles of department chairs. The Journal of Technology of Studies 21(1): 12-23.
Fairweather, J. S. (1996). Faculty Work and Public Trust: Restoring the Value of Teaching and Public Service in American Academic Life. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Finkelstein, M. J., Seal, R. K., and Schuster, J. H. (1998). The New Academic Generation: A Profession in Transition. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Hagedorn, L. S. (1994). Retirement proximity's role in the prediction of satisfaction in academe. Research in Higher Education 35(6): 711-728.
Hagedorn, L. S. (1996). Wage equity and female faculty job satisfaction: The role of wage differentials in a job satisfaction causal model. Research in Higher Education 37(5): 569-598.
Johnsrud, L. K. (1996). Maintaining Morale: A Guide to Assessing the Morale of Midlevel Administrators and Faculty. Washington, DC: College and University Personnel Association.
Johnsrud, L. K., and Atwater, C. D. (1994). Barriers to the retention and tenure of women and minorities: The case of a university's faculty. Review of Higher Education 17(4): 335-353.
Johnsrud, L. K., and Heck, R. H. (1994). A university's faculty: Predicting those who will stay and those who leave. Journal for Higher Education Management 10(1): 71-84.
Johnsrud, L. K., and Heck, R. H. (1998). Faculty worklife: Establishing benchmarks across groups. Research in Higher Education 39(5): 539-555.
Johnsrud, L. K., Heck, R. H., and Rosser, V. J. (2000). Morale matters: Midlevel administrators and their intent to leave. Journal of Higher Education 71(1): 34-59.
Johnsrud, L. K., and Rosser, V. J. (1999). College and university mid-level administrators: Explaining and improving their morale. Review of Higher Education 22(2): 121-141.
Johnsrud, L. K., and Rosser, V. J. (forthcoming). Faculty members' morale and their intentions to leave: A multilevel explanation. Journal of Higher Education, 73(4): July-August 2002.
Johnsrud, L. K., and Sadao, K. C. (1998). The common experience of “Otherness”: Ethnic and racial minority faculty. Review of Higher Education 21(4): 315-342.
Lease, S. H. (1999). Occupational role stressors, coping, support, and hardiness as predictors of strain in academic faculty: An emphasis on new and female faculty. Research in Higher Education 40(3): 285-307.
Luce, J. A., and Murray, J. P. (1998). New faculty's perceptions of the academic work life. New Forum Press 15(3): 103-110.
Moore, K. M. (1983). Leaders in Transition-A National Study of Higher Education Administrators. University Park: Center for the Study of Higher Education, Pennsylvania State University.
Nakanishi, D. T. (1993). Asian Pacific Americans in higher education: Faculty and administrative representation and tenure. In J. Gainen and R. Boice (eds.), Building a Diverse Faculty, pp. 51-59. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Olsen, D., Maple, S. A., and Stage, F. K. (1995). Women and minority faculty job satisfaction: Professional role interests, professional satisfactions, and institutional fit. Journal of Higher Education 66(3): 267-293.
Olsen, D., and Near, J. P. (1994). Role conflict and faculty life satisfaction. Review of Higher Education 17(2): 179-195.
Perry, R. P., Clifton, R. A., Menec, V. H., Struthers, C. W., and Menges, R. J. (2000). Faculty in transition: A longitudinal analysis of perceived control and type of institution in the research productivity of newly hired faculty. Research in Higher Education 41(2): 165-194.
Rice, R. E., Sorcinelli, M. D., and Austin, A. E. (2000). Heeding New Voices: Academic Careers for a New Generation. New Pathways Inquiry #7. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education.
Scott, R. A. (1978). Lords, Squires and Yeoman: Collegiate Middle managers and Their Organizations. AAHE-ERIC/Higher Education Research Report no. 7. Washington, DC: American Association of the Higher Education.
Smart, J. C. (1990). A causal model of faculty turnover intentions. Research in Higher Education 31(5): 405-424.
Smith, E., Anderson, J. L., and Lovrich, N. P. (1995). The multiple sources of workplace stress among land-grant university faculty. Research in Higher Education 36(3): 261-282.
Turner, C. S. V., and Myers, Jr., S. L. (2000). Faculty of Color in Academe: Bittersweet Success. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Vander Putten, J., McLendon, M. K., and Peterson, M. W. (1997). Comparing union and nonunion staff perceptions of the higher education work environment. Research in Higher Education 38(1): 131-147.
Volkwein, J. F., Malik, S. M., and Napierski-Prancl, M. (1998). Administrative satisfaction and the regulatory climate at public universities. Research in Higher Education 39(1): 43-63.
Volkwein, J. F., and Parmley, K. (2000). Comparing administrative satisfaction in public and private universities. Research in Higher Education 41(1): 95-116.
Wolverton, M., Gmelch, W. H., Wolverton. M. L., and Sarros, J. C. (1999a). A comparison of department chair tasks in Australia and the United States. Higher Education 38: 333-350.
Wolverton, M., Gmelch, W. H., Wolverton. M. L., and Sarros, J. C. (1999b). Stress in academic leadership: U.S. and Australian department chairs/heads. The Review of Higher Education 22(2): 165-185.
Wolverton, M., Wolverton, M. L., and Gmelch, W. H. (1999). The impact of role conflict and ambiguity on academic deans. Journal of Higher Education 70(1): 80-106.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Johnsrud, L.K. Measuring the Quality of Faculty and Administrative Worklife: Implications for College and University Campuses. Research in Higher Education 43, 379–395 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014845218989
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014845218989