Abstract
The standard analysis of quantification says that determiner quantifiers (such as every) take an NP predicate and create a generalized quantifier. The goal of this paper is to subject these beliefs to crosslinguistic scrutiny. I begin by showing that in St'á'imcets (Lillooet Salish), quantifiers always require sisters of argumental type, and the creation of a generalized quantifier from an NP predicate always proceeds in two steps rather than one. I then explicitly adopt the strong null hypothesis that the denotations of quantifiers should be crosslinguistically uniform. Since the Salish data cannot be captured by the usual analysis of English, I pursue the idea that English is reducible to the Salish pattern. Reanalysis of many English constructions is required. I argue that the reanalysis has advantages over the standard analysis for partitives, as well as for non-partitive all- and most-phrases, which I analyze as containing bare plurals of argumental type. Even where the new analysis faces some challenges (for example, with every), the attempt still leads to fruitful results. It forces us to view familiar constructions in a new light, and to redefine, I believe correctly, which quantificational constructions are ‘basic’ and which stand in need of further explanation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Abbott, B.: 1996, ‘Doing Without a Partitive Constraint’, in J. Hoeksema (ed.), Partitives: Studies on the Syntax and Semantics of the Partitive and Related Constructions, pp. 25–56. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin and New York.
Baker, M.: 1995, ‘On the Absence of Certain Quantifiers in Mohawk’, in E. Bach, E. Jelinek, A. Kratzer and B. Partee (eds.), Quantification in Natural Languages, pp. 21–58. Kluwer, Dordrecht.
Barker, C.: 1998, ‘Partitives, Double Genitives, and Anti–Uniqueness’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 16, 679–717.
Barwise, J. and R. Cooper: 1981, ‘Generalized Quantifiers and Natural Language’, Linguistics and Philosophy 4, 159–219.
Barwise, J. and J. Perry: 1983, Situations and Attitudes. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Beghelli, F. and T. Stowell: 1997, ‘Distributivity and Negation: The Syntax of Each and Every’, in A. Szabolcsi (ed.), Ways of Scope Taking, pp. 71–107. Kluwer, Dordrecht.
Berwick, R.: 1985, The Acquisition of Syntactic Knowledge. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
van Benthem, J.: 1986, Essays in Logical Semantics. Reidel, Dordrecht.
Brisson, C.: 1998, Distributivity, Maximality, and Floating Quantifiers, PhD dissertation, Rutgers University.
Carlson, G.: 1977, Reference to Kinds in English, PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
Cann, R.: 1993, Formal Semantics: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Chierchia, G.: 1995, ‘Plurality of Mass Nouns and the Notion of “Semantic Parameter”’, ms., University of Milan.
Chierchia, G.: 1998, ‘Reference to Kinds across Languages’, Natural Language Semantics 6, 339–405.
Chierchia, G. and S. McConnell–Ginet: 1990, Meaning and Grammar: An Introduction to Semantics. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Chomsky, N.: 1986, Barriers. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Condoravdi, C.: 1994, Descriptions in Context, PhD dissertation, Yale University.
Cooper, R.: 1987, ‘Preliminaries to the Treatment of Generalized Quantifiers in Situation Semantics’, in P. Gärdenfors (ed.), Generalized Quantifiers: Linguistic and Logical Approaches, pp. 73–91. Reidel, Dordrecht.
Cooper, R.: 1996, ‘The Role of Situations in Generalized Quantifiers’, in S. Lappin (ed.), The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory, pp. 65–86. Blackwell, Oxford.
Davis, H.: 1999, ‘Word Order in St'át'imcets’, in M. Q. Hinkson (ed.), Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Salish and Neighbouring Languages, pp. 61–82. Secwepemc Cultural Education Society, Kamloops, B.C.
Demirdache, H.: 1997, ‘On the Temporal Location of Predication Times: The Role of Determiners in Lillooet Salish’, in E. Curtis, Y. Lyle, and G. Webster (eds.), Proceedings of WCCFL 16, pp. 129–143. CSLI Publications, Stanford.
Demirdache, H., D. Gardiner, P. Jacobs and L. Matthewson: 1994, ‘The Case for D–quantification in Salish: “All” in St'át'imcets, Squamish and Secwepemctsín’, in Papers for the 29th International Conference on Salish and Neighboring Languages, pp. 145–203. Salish Kootenai College, Pablo, Montana.
Diesing, M.: 1992, Indefinites. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Dowty, D.: 1987, ‘Collective Predicates, Distributive Predicates, and All’, in F. Marshall (ed.), Proceedings of the 3rd ESCOL. The Ohio State University, Columbus.
van Eijk, J.: 1997, The Lillooet Language: Phonology, Morphology, Syntax. University of British Columbia Press, Vancouver.
von Fintel, K.: 1994, Restrictions on Quantifier Domains, PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
Fodor, J. D. and I. A. Sag: 1982, ‘Referential and Quantificational Indefinites’, Linguistics and Philosophy 5, 355–398.
Gil, D.: 1995, ‘Universal Quantifiers and Distributivity’, in E. Bach, E. Jelinek, A. Kratzer and B. Partee (eds.), Quantification in Natural Languages, pp. 321–363. Kluwer, Dordrecht.
Gerstner, C. and M. Krifka: 1995, ‘Genericity’, in J. Jacobs, A. von Stechow, W. Sternefeld, and T. Vennemann (eds.), Handbuch der Syntax, pp. 966–978. de Gruyter, Berlin.
Heim, I. and A. Kratzer: 1998, Semantics in Generative Grammar, Blackwell, Oxford.
Higginbotham, J.: 1985, ‘On Semantics’, Linguistic Inquiry 16, 547–593.
Hoeksema, J.: 1983, ‘Plurality and Conjunctions’, in A. ter Meulen (ed.), Studies in Modeltheoretic Semantics, GRASS 1, pp. 63–83. Foris, Dordrecht.
Hoeksema, J.: 1984, ‘Partitives’, ms., University of Groningen.
Hoeksema, J.: 1996, ‘Introduction’, in J. Hoeksema (ed.), Partitives: Studies on the Syntax and Semantics of the Partitive and Related Constructions, pp. 1–24. de Gruyter, Berlin.
Hogg, R.: 1977, English Quantifier Systems. North–Holland, Amsterdam.
de Hoop, H.: 1997, ‘A Semantic Reanalysis of the Partitive Constraint’, Lingua 103, 151–174.
Jackendoff, R.: 1977, X′ Syntax: A Study of Phrase Structure. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Jelinek, E.: 1995, ‘Quantification in Straits Salish’, in E. Bach, E. Jelinek, A. Kratzer and B. Partee (eds.), Quantification in Natural Languages, pp. 487–540. Kluwer, Dordrecht.
Keenan, E.: 1996, ‘The Semantics of Determiners’, in S. Lappin (ed.), The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory, pp. 41–63. Blackwell, Oxford.
Keenan, E. and J. Stavi: 1986, ‘A Semantic Characterization of Natural Language Determiners’, Linguistics and Philosophy 9, 253–326.
Kölver, U.: 1978, ‘On Newari Noun Phrases’, in H. Seiler (ed.), Language Universals, pp. 277–300. Gunter Narr Verlag: Tübingen.
Kratzer, A.: 1978, Semantik der Rede: Kontexttheorie – Modalwörter – Konditionalsätze. Scriptor, Königstein/Taunus.
Kratzer, A.: 1995, ‘Stage–Level and Individual–Level Predicates’, in G. Carlson and F. J. Pelletier (eds.), The Generic Book, pp. 125–175. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Kratzer, A.: 1998, ‘Scope or Pseudo–Scope? Are There Wide–Scope Indefinites?’, in S. Rothstein (ed.), Events in Grammar, pp. 163–196. Kluwer, Dordrecht.
Krifka, M.: 1988, ‘The Relational Theory of Generics’, in M. Krifka (ed.), Genericity in Natural Language, SNS–Bericht 88–42, pp. 285–312. University of Tübingen.
Ladusaw, W.: 1982, ‘Semantic Constraints on the English Partitive Construction’, in D. Flickinger, M. Macken, and N. Wiegand (eds.), Proceedings of WCCFL 1, 231–242. Stanford University, Stanford.
Landman, F.: 2000, ‘Predicate–Argument Mismatches and the Adjectival Theory of Indefinites’, paper presented at the International Conference on the Syntax and Pragmasemantics of Noun Phrases, Antwerp.
Larson, R. and G. Segal: 1995, Knowledge of Meaning. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Lin, J.–W.: 1998, ‘Distributivity in Chinese and Its Implications’, Natural Language Semantics 6, 201–243.
Link, G.: 1983, ‘The Logical Analysis of Plurals and Mass Terms: A Lattice Theoretical Approach’, in R. Bäuerle, C. Schwarze, and A. von Stechow (eds.), Meaning, Use, and the Interpretation of Language, pp. 302–323. de Gruyter, Berlin.
Lewis, D.: 1973, Counterfactuals. Blackwell, Oxford.
Lewis, D.: 1986, On the Plurality of Worlds. Blackwell, Oxford.
Longobardi, G.: 1994, ‘Reference and Proper Names: A Theory of N–Movement in Syntax and Logical Form’, Linguistic Inquiry 25, 609–665.
Manzini, M. R. and K. Wexler: 1987, ‘Parameters, Binding Theory, and Learnability’, Linguistic Inquiry 18, 413–444.
Matthewson, L.: 1998, Determiner Systems and Quantificational Strategies: Evidence from Salish. Holland Academic Graphics, The Hague.
Matthewson, L.: 1999, ‘On the Interpretation of Wide Scope Indefinites’, Natural Language Semantics 7, 79–134.
Matthewson, L.: 2000, ‘Quantification and (the Absence of) Cross–Linguistic Variation’, in K. Kusumoto and E. Villalta (eds.), University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 23. GLSA, Amherst, Mass.
Matthewson, L. and H. Davis: 1995, ‘The Structure of DP in St'át'imcets (Lillooet Salish)’, in Papers for the 30th International Conference on Salish and Neighboring Languages, pp. 54–68. University of Victoria.
Neale, S.: 1990, Descriptions. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Partee, B.: 1988, ‘Many Quantifiers’, in J. Powers and K. de Jong (eds.), Proceedings of the Fifth ESCOL, pp. 383–402. The Ohio State University, Columbus.
Partee, B.: 1995, ‘Quantificational Structures and Compositionality’, in E. Bach, E. Jelinek, A. Kratzer and B. Partee (eds.), Quantification in Natural Languages, pp. 541–601. Kluwer, Dordrecht.
Partee, B., A. ter Meulen and R. Wall.: 1990, Mathematical Methods in Linguistics. Kluwer, Dordrecht.
Percus, O.: 1998, ‘Some Instructions for the Worldly’, in K. Shahin, S. Blake, and E.–S. Kim (eds.), Proceedings of WCCFL 17, pp. 522–536. CSLI Publications, Stanford.
Reed, A.: 1991, ‘On Interpreting Partitives’, in D. J. Napoli and J. A. Kegl (eds.), Bridges between Psychology and Linguistics: A Swarthmore Festschrift for Lila Gleitman, pp. 207–223. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
Reed, A.: 1996, ‘Partitives, Existentials, and Partitive Determiners’, in J. Hoeksema (ed.), Partitives: Studies on the Syntax and Semantics of the Partitive and Related Constructions, pp. 143–178. de Gruyter, Berlin.
Reinhart, T.: 1995, Interface Strategies, OTS Working Papers, TL–95–002.
Reinhart, T.: 1997, ‘Quantifier Scope: How Labor is Divided Between QR and Choice Functions’, Linguistics and Philosophy 20, 335–397.
Schwarzschild, R.: 1991, On the Meaning of Definite Plural Noun Phrases, PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
Schwarzschild, R.: 1996, Pluralities. Kluwer, Dordrecht.
Selkirk, E.: 1977, ‘Some Remarks on Noun Phrase Structure’, in P. Culicover, T. Wasow, and A. Akmajian (eds.), Formal Syntax, pp. 285–316. Academic Press, New York.
Stowell, T.: 1989, ‘Subjects, Specifiers and X–Bar Theory’, in M. Baltin and A. Kroch (eds.), Alternative Conceptions of Phrase Structure, pp. 232–262. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London.
de Swart, H.: 1998, Introduction to Natural Language Semantics. CSLI, Stanford.
Szabolcsi, A.: 1997, ‘Strategies for Scope Taking’, in A. Szabolcsi (ed.), Ways of Scope Taking, pp. 109–154. Kluwer, Dordrecht.
Tunstall, S.: 1998, The Interpretation of Quantifiers: Semantics and Processing, PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
Vieira, M. D.: 1995, ‘The Expression of Quantificational Notions in Asurini do Trocará: Evidence Against the Universality of Determiner Quantification’, in E. Bach, E. Jelinek, A. Kratzer and B. Partee (eds.), Quantification in Natural Languages, pp. 701–720. Kluwer, Dordrecht.
Westerstahl, D.: 1984, ‘Determiners and Context Sets’, in J. van Benthem and A. ter Meulen (eds.), Generalized Quantifiers in Natural Languages, pp. 45–71. Reidel, Dordrecht.
Wilkinson, K.: 1996, ‘Bare Plurals, Plural Pronouns and the Partitive Constraint’, in J. Hoeksema (ed.), Partitives: Studies on the Syntax and Semantics of the Partitive and Related Constructions, pp. 209–230. de Gruyter, Berlin.
Winter, Y.: 1997, ‘Choice Functions and the Scopal Semantics of Indefinites’, Linguistics and Philosophy 20, 399–467.
Zamparelli, R.: 1998, ‘A Theory of Kinds, Partitives, and OF/Z Possessives’, in A. Alexiadou and C. Wilder (eds.), Possessors, Predicates and Movement in the Determiner Phrase (Linguistics Today 22). Benjamins, Amsterdam.
Zamparelli, R.: 2000, Layers in the Determiner Phrase, PhD dissertation, University of Rochester.
Zepeda, O.: 1983, A Papago Grammar. University of Arizona Press, Tuscon.
Zimmermann, T. E.: 1992, ‘On the Proper Treatment of Opacity in Certain Versb’, Natural Language Semantics 1(2), 149–179.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Matthewson, L. Quantification and the Nature of Crosslinguistic Variation. Natural Language Semantics 9, 145–189 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012492911285
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012492911285