Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Development of a Brief Multidimensional Aversion to Women Who Work Scale

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A brief multidimensional measure of aversion to women who work (MAWWWS) was developed using data collected from 175 predominantly lower income Anglo American undergraduate and graduate students attending a medium-sized university located in the southern United States. Findings indicated that the 10-item measure exhibited acceptable reliability, as well as adequate convergent and criterion validities. Consequently, the MAWWWS may be a useful measure of employment-related gender attitudes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

REFERENCES

  • Abu-Saad, I. (1999). Self-esteem among Arab adolescents in Israel. The Journal of Social Psychology, 139, 479-486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, C. D., & Tomaskovic-Devey, D. (1995). Patriarchal pressures: An exploration of organizational processes that exacerbate and erode gender earnings inequality. Work and Occupations, 22, 328-356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auster, C. J., & Ohm, S. C. (2000). Masculinity and femininity in contemporary American society: A reevaluation using the Bem Sex-Role Inventory. Sex Roles, 43, 499-527.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhatnagar, D., & Swamy, R. (1995). Attitudes toward women as managers: Does interaction make a difference? Human Relations, 48, 1285-1307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brady, T. (1998). How equal is equal pay? Management Review, 87, 59-61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne, B. A. (1997). Gender and beliefs about work force discrimination in the United States and Australia. The Journal of Social Psychology, 137, 107-116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cann, A., & Siegfried, W. D. (1987). Sex stereotypes and the leadership role. Sex Roles, 17, 401-408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, L., & Chang-McBride, C. (1997). Self-and peer-ratings of female and male roles and attributes. Journal of Social Psychology, 137, 527-529.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colwill, N. L. (1987). Manand womenin organizations: Roles and status, stereotypes and power. In K. S. Koziara, M. H. Moskow, & L.D. Tanner (Eds.), Working women: Past, present, and future (pp. 97-117). Washington, DC: Bureau of National Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conway, M., & Vartanian, L. R. (2000). A status account of gender stereotypes: Beyond communality and agency. Sex Roles, 43, 181-199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, V. W. (1997). Homophily or the Queen Bee Syndrome: Female evaluation of female leadership. Small Group Research, 28, 483-499.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daley, D. M., & Naff, K. C. (1998). Gender differences and managerial competencies: Federal supervisor perceptions of the job of management. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 18, 41-56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubno, P., Costas, J., Cannon, H., Wankel, C., & Emin, H. (1979). An empirically keyed scale for measuring managerial attitudes toward women executives. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 3, 357-363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., & Johnson, B. T. (1990). Gender and leadership style: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 233-256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., Karau, S. J., & Makhijani, M. G. (1995). Gender and the effectiveness of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 125-145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., & Steffen, V. J. (1984). Gender stereotypes stem from the distribution of women and men into social roles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 735-754.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eyring, A., & Stead, B. A. (1998). Shattering the glass ceiling: Some successful corporate practices. Journal of Business Ethics, 17, 245-251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, A. R., & Good, G. E. (1994). Gender, self, and others: Perceptions of the campus environment. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 41, 343-355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, A. R., & Good, G. E. (1998). New directions for the study of gender role attitudes: A cluster analytic investigation of masculine ideologies. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 371-384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galambos, N. L., Petersen, A. C., Richards, M., & Gitelson, I. B. (1985). The Attitudes toward Women Scale for Adolescents (AWSA): A study of reliability and validity. Sex Roles, 13, 343-356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerstmann, E. A., & Kramer, D.A. (1997). Feminist identity development: Psychometric analysis of two feminist identity scales. Sex Roles, 36, 327-348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammick, M., & Acker, S. (1998). Undergraduate research supervision: A gender analysis. Studies in Higher Education, 23, 335-347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilman, M. E. (1997). Sex discrimination and the affirmative action remedy: The role of sex stereotypes. Journal of Business Ethics, 16, 877-889.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilman, M. E., & Martell, R. E. (1986). Exposure to successful women: Antidote to sex discrimination applicant screening decisions? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37, 376-390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henley, N. M., Meng, K., O'Brien, D., McCarthy, W. J., & Sockloskie, R. J. (1998). Developing a scale to measure the diversity of feminist attitudes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 317-348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeanquart-Barone, S., & Sekaran, U. (1994). Effects of supervisor's gender on American women's trust. Journal of Social Psychology, 134, 253-254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorstad, J. (1996). Narcissism and leadership: Some differences in male and female leaders. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 17, 17-23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korabik, K., & Rosin, H.M.(1995). The impact of children onwomenmanagers' career behavior and organizational commitment. Human Resource Management, 34, 513-528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamke, L. K. (1982). The impact of sex-role orientation on self-esteem in early adolescence. Child Development, 53, 1530-1535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, A. E., & Fagenson-Eland, E. A. (1998). The influence of gender and organization level on perceptions of leadership behaviors: A self and supervisor comparison. Sex Roles, 39, 479-502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, G. B., & Park, K. (1989). Turnover rates in federal white-collar employment: Are women more likely to quit than men? American Review of Public Administration, 19, 13-48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liss, M., Hoffner, C., & Crawford, M. (2000). What do feminists believe? Psychology ofWomen Quarterly, 24, 279-284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loo, R., & Thorpe, K. (1998). Attitudes toward women's roles in society: A replication after 20 years. Sex Roles, 39, 903-912.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maccoby, E. E., & Jacklin, C.N. (1974), The psychology of sex differences. Stanford,CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGlashan, K. E., Wright, P. M., & McCormick, B. (1995). Preferential selection and stereotypes: Effects on evaluation of female leader performance, subordinate goal commitment, and task performance. Sex Roles, 33, 669-686.

    Google Scholar 

  • McHugh, M. C., & Frieze, I. H. (1997). The measurement of gender-role attitudes: A review and commentary. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 1-16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mott, V. W. (1998). Women's career development in midlife and beyond. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 80, 25-33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohlott, P., Ruderman, M., & McCauley, C. (1994). Gender differences in managers' development job experiences. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 46-67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, C. L., & Todor, W. D. (1993). Attitudes toward women as managers: Still the same. Business Horizons, 36, 12-16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, L. H., Terborg, J. R., & Taynor, J. (1974). Women as Managers Scale(WAMS):Ameasure of attitudes toward women in managerial positions. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, Ms. No. 585.

  • Pfeffer, J., & Ross, J. (1990). Gender-based wage differences: The effects of organizational context. Work and Occupations, 17, 55-78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reskin, B., & Padavic, I. (1994). Women and men at work. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, R. W., Bender, L. R., & Vitters, A. G. (1980). Leader sex, follower attitudes toward women, and leadership effectiveness: A laboratory experiment. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 25, 46-56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rigg, C., & Sparrow, J. (1994). Gender, diversity and working styles. Women in Management Review, 9, 9-16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, B., & Jerdee, T. H. (1975). The psychological basis for sex role stereotypes—a note on Terborg and Ilgen's conclusions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 14, 151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreiber, P. J. (1998). Women's career development patterns. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 80, 5-13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T., & Buckner, C. E. (2000). Instrumental and expressive traits, trait stereotypes, and sexist attitudes: What do they signify? Psychology of Women Quarterly, 24, 44-62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. L. (1972). The Attitudes toward Women Scale: An objective instrument to measure attitudes towards the rights and roles of women in contemporary society. JAS: Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 2, 66-67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. L. (1978). Masculinity and femininity: Their psychological dimensions, correlates, and antecedents. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R. L., & Stapp, J. (1975). Ratings of self and peers on sex role attributes and their relation to self-esteem and conceptions of masculinity and femininity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 29-39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephan, C. W., Stephan, W. G., Demitrakis, K. M., Yamada, A. M., & Clason, D. L. (2000). Women's attitudes toward men: An integrated threat theory approach. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 24, 63-73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, C. D., & Moore, K. K. (1985). Executive women: Twenty years later. Harvard Business Review, 85, 42-66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swim, J. K., Aiken, K. J., Hall, W. S., & Hunter, B. A. (1995). Sexism and racism: Old fashioned and modern prejudices. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 199-214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talmud, I., & Izraeli, D. N. (1999). The relationship between gender and performance issues of concern to directors: Correlates or institution? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 459-474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terborg, J. R., Peters, L. H., Ilgen, D. R., & Smith, S. (1977). Organizational and personal correlates of attitudes toward women as managers. Academy of Management Journal, 20, 89-100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valentine, S. (1998). Self-esteem and men's negative stereotypes of women who work. Psychological Reports, 83, 920-922.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valentine, S., & Godkin, L. (2000). Supervisor gender, leadership style, and perceived job design. Women in Management Review, 15, 117-129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valentine, S., & Elias, R. (in press). Perceived sex discrimination: The role of sex stereotyping among Hispanic and non-Hispanic women. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality.

  • Valentine, S., & Mosely, G. (1998). Aversion to women who work and perceived discrimination among Euro-Americans and Mexican-Americans. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 86, 1027-1033.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valentine, S., & Mosely, G. (1999). Acculturation and sex-role attitudes among Mexican Americans: A longitudinal analysis. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 22, 104-113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valenzuela, A. (1993). Liberal gender role attitudes and academic achievement among Mexican-origin adolescents in two Houston inner-city catholic schools. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 15, 310-323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoder, J. D., & McDonald, T. W. (1997). The generalizability and construct validity of the Modern Sexism Scale: Some cautionary notes. Sex Roles, 36, 655-663.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Wyoming, Wyomimg;

    Sean Valentine

Authors
  1. Sean Valentine
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sean Valentine.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Valentine, S. Development of a Brief Multidimensional Aversion to Women Who Work Scale. Sex Roles 44, 773–787 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012206632272

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012206632272

Keywords

Search

Navigation