Skip to main content
Log in

Numerical Investigation of Boundary-Layer Evolution and Nocturnal Low-Level Jets: Local versus Non-Local PBL Schemes

  • Published:
Environmental Fluid Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Numerical simulations of the evolution of the planetary boundary layer (PBL) and nocturnal low-level jets (LLJ) have been carried out using MM5 (version 3.3) with four-dimensional data assimilation (FDDA) for a high pollution episode in the northeastern United States during July 15–20, 1999. In this paper, we assess the impact of different parameterizations on the PBL evolution with two schemes: the Blackadar PBL, a hybrid local (stable regime) and non-local (convective regime) mixing scheme; and the Gayno–Seaman PBL, a turbulent kinetic energy (TKE)-based eddy diffusion scheme. No FDDA was applied within the PBL to evaluate the ability of the two schemes to reproduce the PBL structure and its temporal variation. The restriction of the application of FDDA to the atmosphere above the PBL or the lowest 8 model levels, whichever is higher, has significantly improved the predicted strength and timing of the LLJ during the night. A systematic analysis of the PBL evolution has been performed for the primary meteorological fields (temperature, specific humidity, horizontal winds) and for the derived parameters such as the PBL height, virtual potential temperature, relative humidity, and cloud cover fraction. There are substantial differences between the PBL structures and evolutions simulated by these two different schemes. The model results were compared with independent observations (that were not used in FDDA) measured by aircraft, RASS and wind profiler, lidar, and tethered balloon platforms during the summer of 1999 as part of the NorthEast Oxidant and Particle Study (NE-OPS). The observations tend to support the non-local mixing mechanism better than the layer-to-layer eddy diffusion in the convective PBL.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cohn, S.A. and Angevine, W.M.: 2000, Boundary layer height and entrainment zone thickness measured by lidars and wind-profiling radars, J. Appl. Meteorol. 39, 1233–1247.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Shafran, P.C., Seaman, N.L. and Gayno, G.A.: 2000, Evaluation of numerical predictions of boundary-layer structure during the Lake Michigan Ozone Study (LMOS), J. Appl. Meteorol. 39, 412–426.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Alapaty, K., Pleim, J.E., Raman, S., Niyogi, D.S. and Byun, D.W.: 1997, Simulation of atmospheric boundary layer processes using local-and nonlocal-closure schemes. J. Appl. Meteorol. 36, 214–233.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ku, J.-Y., Mao, H., Zhang, K., Civerolo, K., Rao, S.T., Philbrick, C.R., Doddridge, B. and Clark, R.: 2001, Numerical investigation of the effects of boundary-layer evolution on the predictions of ozone and the efficacy of emission control options in the northeastern United States, Environ. Fluid. Mech. 1, 209–233.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dudhia, J.: 1993, A nonhydrostatic version of the Penn State-NCAR Mesoscale Model: validation tests and simulation of an Atlantic cyclone and cold front, Mon. Wea. Rev. 121, 1493–1513.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Grell, G.A., Dudhia, J. and Stauffer, D.R.: 1994, A Description of the Fifth-Generation Penn State/NCAR Mesoscale Model (MM5), National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Byun, D.W. and Ching, J.K.S.: 1999, Science Algorithms of the EPA MODELS-3 Community Multiscale Air Quality Model (CMAQ) Modeling System, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Stauffer, D.R. and Seaman, N.L.: 1990, Use of four-dimensional data assimilation in a limitedarea mesoscale model. Part I: experiments with synoptic scale data, Mon. Wea. Rev. 118, 1250–1277.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Stauffer, D.R., Seaman, N.L. and Binkowski, F.S.: 1991, Use of four-dimensional data assimilation in a limited-area mesoscale model. Part II: effects of data assimilation within the planetary boundary layer, Mon. Wea. Rev. 119, 734–754.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Seaman, N.L.: 2000, Meteorological modeling for air-quality assessments, Atmos. Environ. 34, 2231–2259.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Biswas, J. and Rao, S.T.: 2001, Uncertainties in episodic ozone modeling stemming from uncertainties in the meteorological fields, J. Appl. Meteorol. 40, 117–136.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sistla, G., Hao, W., Ku, J.Y., Kallos, G., Lagouvardos, K., Kotrini, V., Zhang, K., Mao, H. and Rao, S.T.: 2001, An operational evaluation of two regional-scale ozone air quality modeling systems over the eastern United States, Bull. Amer. Meteorol. Soc. 82, 945–964.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Blackadar, A.K.: 1979, High resolution models of the planetary boundary layer. In: J. Pfafflin and E. Zeigler (eds.), Advances in Environmental Science and Engineering, pp. 50–85, Gordon and Breach, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gayno, G.A., Seaman, N.L., Lario, A.M. and Stauffer, D.R.: Forecasting visibility using a 1.5-closure boundary layer scheme in a 12-km non-hydrostatic model. In: Tenth Conference on Numerical Weather Prediction, pp. 18–20, American Meteorological Society, Boston, MA.

  15. Troen, I. and Mahrt, L.: 1986, A simple model of the atmospheric boundary layer: sensitivity to surface evaporation, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 37, 129–148.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hong, S.Y. and Pan, H.L.: 1996, Nonlocal boundary layer vertical diffusion in a medium-range forecast model, Mon. Wea. Rev. 124, 2322–2339.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang, D. and Anthes, R.A.: 1982, A high-resolution model of the planetary boundary layer-sensitivity tests and comparisons with SESAME-79 data, J. Appl. Meteorol. 21, 1594–1609.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Philbrick, C.R.: 1998, Investigations of factors determining the occurrence of ozone and fine particles in northeastern U.S.A. In: Measurement of Toxic and Related Air Pollutants, pp. 248–260, Air & Waste Management Association, Pittsburgh, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Pagnotti, V.: 1987, A mesoscale meteorological feature associated with high ozone concentrations in the northeastern United States, J. Air Pollut. Control Assoc. 37, 720–722.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Walcek, C.J.: 1994, Cloud cover and its relationship to relative humidity during a spring midlatitude cyclone, Mon. Wea. Rev. 122, 1021–1035.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Angevine, W.M., Bakwin, P.S. and Davis, K.J.: 1998, Wind profiler and RASS measurements compared with measurements from a 450-m-tall tower, J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol. 15, 818–825.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Berman, S., Ku, J.Y. and Rao, S.T.: 1999, Spatial and temporal variation in the mixing depth over the northeastern United States during the summer of 1995, J. Appl. Meteorol. 38, 1661–1673.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Moeng, C.H.: 1984, A large-eddy-simulation model for the study of planetary boundary-layer turbulence, J. Atmos. Sci. 41, 2052–2062.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Moeng, C.H. and Wyngaard, J.C.: 1984, Statistics of conservative scalars in the convective boundary layer, J. Atmos. Sci. 41, 3161–3169.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Moeng, C.H. and Wyngaard, J.C.: 1989, Evaluation of turbulent transport and dissipation closures in second-order modeling, J. Atmos. Sci. 46, 2311–2330.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Pleim, J. and Chang, J.S.: 1992, A nonlocal closure model for vertical mixing in the convective boundary layer, Atmos. Environ. 26, 965–981.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Zhang, J. and Rao, S.T.: 1999, The role of vertical mixing in the temporal evolution of groundlevel ozone concentrations, J. Appl. Meteorol. 38, 1674–1691.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Whiteman, C.D., Bian, X. and Zhong, S.: 1997, Low-level jet climatology from enhanced rawinsonde observations at a site in the South Great Plains, J. Appl. Meteorol. 36, 1363–1376.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kaplan, M.L., Lin, Y.L., Charney, J.J., Pfeiffer, K.D., Ensley, D.B., DeCroix, D.S. and Weglarz, R.P.: 2000, A terminal area PBL prediction system at Dallas-Fort Worth and its application in simulating diurnal PBL jets, Bull. Amer. Meteorol. Soc. 81, 2179–2204.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Anderson, B.T., Roads, J.O., Chen, S.C. and Juang, H.M. H.: 2000, Regional simulation of the low-level monsoon winds over the Gulf of California and southwestern United States, J. Geophys. Res. 105, 17 955–17 969.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Holtslag, A.A.M., de Bruin, E.I.F and Pan, H.L.: 1990, A high resolution air mass transformation model for short-range weather forecasting, Mon. Wea. Rev. 118, 1561–1575.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Holtslag, A.A.M., Meijgaard, E.V. and DeRooy, W.C.: 1995: A comparison of boundary layer diffusion schemes in unstable conditions over land, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 76, 69–95.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Willmott, C.J.: 1981, On the validation of models, Phys. Geogr. 2, 168–194.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhang, K., Mao, H., Civerolo, K. et al. Numerical Investigation of Boundary-Layer Evolution and Nocturnal Low-Level Jets: Local versus Non-Local PBL Schemes. Environmental Fluid Mechanics 1, 171–208 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011557402158

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011557402158

Navigation