Abstract
Implicit in option-pricing models of mortgage valuation are threshold levels of put-option value that must be crossed to induce borrower default. There has been little research into what these threshold values are that come out of pricing models or how they compare to exercised option values seen in empirical data. This study decomposes boundary conditions for optimal default exercise to look at the economic dynamics that should lead to optimal default timing. Empirical data on FHA insured mortgage foreclosures is then examined to discern the predictive influence of optimal-option-valuation-and-exercise variables on observed default timing and values. Interesting results include a new understanding of how to measure and use property equity variables during economic downturns, house-price index ranges over which default is exercised for various classes of borrowers, and implied differences in appreciation rates between market-price indices and foreclosed properties.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ambrose, B. W., and R. J. Buttimer. (2000). “Embedded Options in the Mortgage Contract,” Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 21(2, September), 95–111.
Ambrose, B. W., R. J. Buttimer, and C. A. Capone, Jr. (1997). “Pricing Mortgage Default and Foreclosure Delay,” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 29(3), 314–325.
Ambrose, B. W., and C. A. Capone, Jr. (1996). “Cost-Benefit Analysis of Single-Family Foreclosure Alternatives,” Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 13, 105–120.
Ambrose, B. W., and C. A. Capone, Jr. (1998). “Modeling the Conditional Probability of Foreclosure in the Context of Single-Family Mortgage Default Resolutions,” Real Estate Economics 26(3), 391–430.
Berkovec, J. A., G. B. Canner, S. A. Gabriel, and T. Hannan. (1998). “Discrimination, Competition, and Loan Performance in FHA Mortgage Lending,” Review of Economics and Statistics 80(2), 241–250.
Capone, Jr., C. A. (1996). Providing Alternatives to Mortgage Foreclosure: A Report to Congress. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, August (HUD-1611–PDR).
Clauretie, T. (1990). “A Note on Mortgage Risk: Default vs. Loss Rates,” AREUEA Journal 18(2), 202–206.
Crawford, G., and E. Rosenblatt. (1995). “Efficient Mortgage Default Option Exercise: Evidence from Loss Severity,” Journal of Real Estate Research 19(5), 543–555.
Deng, Y. (1997). “Mortgage Termination: An Empirical Hazard Model with a Stochastic Term Structure,” Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 14(3), 309–331.
Deng, Y., J. M. Quigley, and R. Van Order. (1996). “Mortgage Default and Low Down-payment Loans: The Cost of Public Subsidy,” Regional Science and Urban Economics 26, 263–285.
Deng, Y., J. M. Quigley, and R. Van Order. (2000). “Mortgage Terminations, Heterogeneity and the Exercise of Mortgage Options,” Econometrica 68(2), 275–307.
Elmer, P. J. (1997). “A Choice Theoretic Model of Mortgage Default,” Manuscript. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Washington, DC.
Foster, C., and R. Van Order. (1984). “An Option-Based Model of Mortgage Default,” Housing Finance Review 3, 351–372.
Heckman, J. (1976). “The Common Structure of Statistical Models of Truncation, Sample Selection and Limited Dependant Variables and a Simple Estimator for Such Models,” Annals of Economic and Social Measurement 5(4, fall), 475–492.
Heckman, J. (1979). “Sample Selectivity Problems as a Specification Error,” Econometrica 44, 153–161.
Jones, L. (1993). “Deficiency Judgments and the Exercise of the Default Option in Home Mortgage Loans,” Journal of Law and Economics 36, 115–138.
Kau, J. B., and D. C. Keenan. (1993). “Transaction Costs, Suboptimal Termination, and Default Probabilities for Mortgages,” AREUEA Journal 21(3), 247–263.
Kau, J., and D. C. Keenan. (1999). “Patterns of Rational Default,” Regional Science and Urban Economics 29, 217–244.
Kau, J. B., D. C. Keenan, W. J. Muller III, and J. F. Epperson. (1992). “A Generalized Valuation Model for Fixed-Rate Residential Mortgages,” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 24(3), 279–299.
Lekkas, V., J. M. Quigley, and R. Van Order. (1993). “Loan Loss Severity and Optimal Mortgage Default,” AREUEA Journal 21(4), 353–372.
Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight. (1999). “Risk-Based Capital,” Federal Register 64(70, April 13), 18084–18300.
Quigley, J. M., and R. Van Order. (1995). “Explicit Tests of Contingent Claims Models,” Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 11, 99–117.
Titman, S., and W. N. Torous. (1989). “Valuing Commercial Mortgage: An Empirical Investigation of the Contingent Claims Approach to Pricing Risky Debt,” Journal of Finance 44, 345–373.
Vandell, K. (1995). “How Ruthless Is Mortgage Default?” Journal of Housing Research 6(2), 245–264.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ambrose, B.W., Capone, C.A. & Deng, Y. Optimal Put Exercise: An Empirical Examination of Conditions for Mortgage Foreclosure. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 23, 213–234 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011110501074
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011110501074