Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Sex and Race Differences in Faculty Tenure and Promotion

  • Published:
Research in Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Data from the 1993 National Study of Postsecondary Faculty are used to explore sources of the lower representation of women and minorities among tenured than tenure track faculty and among full professors than lower ranking faculty. A 2-step approach is used. First, differences in the probability of being tenured rather than on a tenure track are explored. Then, differences in the probability of holding the rank of full professor among faculty who are tenured are examined. Logistic regression analyses are used to isolate the effects of sex and race on the dependent variables after controlling for human capital, productivity, and structural characteristics. For both tenure and promotion to full professor, separate analyses are conducted for women and men in order to explore sex differences in the tenure and promotion processes. All analyses are conducted separately for full-time faculty working at public 2-year institutions and full-time faculty working at 4-year institutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Ashraf, J. (1994). Differences in returns to education: an analysis by race. American Journal of Economics and Sociology 53(3): 281-290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, R. G., and Chronister, J. L. (1996). Full-time non-tenure track faculty. NEA Higher Education Research Center Update 2(5).

  • Bayer, A. E., and Astin, H. S. (1968). Sex differences in academic rank and salary among science doctorates in teaching. Journal of Human Resources 3(2): 191-200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. S. (1962). Investment in human capital: a theoretical analysis. Journal of Political Economy 70 Supplement (5): 9-49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellas, M. L. (1994). Comparable worth in academia: the effects on faculty salaries of the sex composition and labor market conditions of academic disciplines. American Sociological Review 59(6): 807-821.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellas, M. L. (1997). The scholarly productivity of academic couples. In M. A. Ferber and J. W. Loeb (eds.), Academic Couples: Problems and Promises. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellas, M. L., and Toutkoushian, R. K. (1999). Faculty time allocations and research productivity: gender, race, and family effects. Review of Higher Education 22(4): 367-390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biglan, A. (1973). Characteristics of subject matter in different academic areas. Journal of Applied Psychology 57(3): 195-203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, H. R., and Schuster, J. H. (1986). American Professors: A National Resource Imperiled. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broder, I. E. (1993). Professional achievements and gender differences among academic economists. Economic Inquiry 31: 116-127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabrera, A. F. (1994). Logistic regression analysis in higher education: An applied perspective. In J. C. Smart (ed.), Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, Vol. 10, pp. 225-256. New York: Agathon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeYoung, A. J. (1989). Economics and American Education: A Historical and Critical Overview of the Impact of Economic Theories on Schooling in the United States. White Plains, NY: Longman Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreijmanis, J. (1991). Higher education and employment: is professional employment a right? Higher Education Review 23(3): 7-18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, P. (1994). Gender differences in the scholarly activities of accounting academics: an empirical investigation. Issues in Accounting Education 9(2): 231-246.

    Google Scholar 

  • England, P. (1982). The failure of human capital theory to explain occupational sex segregation. Journal of Human Resources 17: 358-370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairweather, J. S. (1995). Myths and realities of academic labor markets. Economics of Education Review 14(2): 179-192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairweather, J. S. (1996). Faculty Work and Public Trust: Restoring the Value of Teaching and Public Service in American Academic Life. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, M. F. (1985). Publication, performance, and reward in science and scholarship. In J. C. Smart (ed.), Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, pp. 255-282. New York: Agathon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gappa, J. M., and Leslie, D. W. (1993). Invisible Faculty: Improving the Status of Part-Timers in Higher Education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glassick, C. E., Huber, M. T., and Maeroff, G. I. (1997). Scholarship Assessed: Evaluation of the Professoriate. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, N. M., Morton, T. E., & Braden, I. C. (1974). Faculty salaries: is there discrimination by sex, race, and discipline? American Economic Review 64(3): 419-427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, C. A., and Ritchey, P. N. (1992). Assessing the differences in distance of interstate migration, 1980. Sociological Focus 25(3): 241-255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnsrud, L. K. (1993). Women and minority faculty experiences: defining and responding to diverse realities. In J. Gainen and R. Boice (eds.), Building a Diverse Faculty, Vol. 53, pp. 3-16. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, L. S. (1998). Scaling the Ivory Tower: Merit and Its Limits in Academic Careers (2nd ed.). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, H., and Perrucci. (1982). The structure of academic fields and rewards in academia. Sociology and Social Research 66(2): 127-147.

    Google Scholar 

  • McElrath, K. (1992). Gender, career disruption, and academic rewards. Journal of Higher Education, 63(3): 269-281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menges, R. J., and Exum, W. H. (1983). Barriers to the progress of women and minority faculty. Journal of Higher Education 54(2): 123-144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, S. M. (1996). Research, teaching, and service: why shouldn't women's work count? Journal of Higher Education 67(1): 46-84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Persell, C. H. (1983). Gender, rewards and research in education. Psychology of Women Quarterly 8(1): 33-47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J., and Langton, N. (1988). Wage inequality and the organization of work: the case of academic departments. Administrative Science Quarterly 33: 588-606.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ransom, M. R., and Megdal, S. B. (1993). Sex differences in the academic labor market in the affirmative action era. Economics of Education Review 12(1): 21-43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riggs, M. L., Downey, R. G., McIntyre, P. E., and Hoyt, D. P. (1986). Using discriminant analysis to predict faculty rank. Research in Higher Education 25(4): 365-376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfeld, R. A., and Jones, J. A. (1987). Patterns and effects of geographic mobility for academic women and men. Journal of Higher Education 58(5): 493-515.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, T. W. (1961). Investment in human capital. American Economic Review 51(1): 1-17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selfa, L. A., Suter, N., Myers, S., Koch, S., Johnson, R. A., Zahs, D. A., Kuhr, B. D., and Abraham, S. Y. (1997). 1993 National Study of Postsecondary Faculty (NSOPF-93) Data File User's Manual Public-Use Institution File and Restricted-Use Faculty File. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smart, J. C. (1991). Gender equity in academic rank and salary. Review of Higher Education 14(4): 511-526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smart, J. C., and McLaughlin, G. W. (1978). Reward structures of academic disciplines. Research in Higher Education 8: 39-55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, K. D., Dalton, M. M., Dino, G. A., and Wilkinson, S. P. (1996). The development of salary goal modeling: from regression analysis to a value-based prescriptive approach. Journal of Higher Education 67(5): 555-576.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szafran, R. F. (1984). Universities and Women Faculty: Why Some Organizations Discriminate More Than Others. New York: Praeger Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tierney, W. G. (1997). Organizational socialization in higher education. Journal of Higher Education 68(1): 1-16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tierney, W. G., and Bensimon, E. M. (1996). Promotion and Tenure: Community and Socialization in Academe. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tierney, W. G., and Rhoads, R. A. (1993). Enhancing promotion, tenure and beyond: Faculty socialization as a cultural process (Report No. 6). Washington, DC: ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toutkoushian, R. K. (1999). The status of academic women in the 1990s: no longer outsiders, but not yet equals. Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance 39(special issue): 679-698.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiler, W. C. (1990). Integrating rank differences into a model of male-female faculty salary discrimination. Quarterly Review of Economics and Business 30(1): 3-15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Youn, T. I. K. (1988). Studies of academic markets and careers: an historical review. In D. W. Breneman and T. I. K. Youn (eds.), Academic Labor Markets and Careers, pp. 8-27. New York: The Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Youn, T. I. K. (1992). The sociology of academic careers and academic labor markets. Research in Labor Economics 13: 101-130.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Education Policy and Leadership, University of Maryland at College Park, 2200 Benjamin Building, College Park, MD, 20742

    Laura W. Perna

Authors
  1. Laura W. Perna
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Perna, L.W. Sex and Race Differences in Faculty Tenure and Promotion. Research in Higher Education 42, 541–567 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011050226672

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011050226672

Search

Navigation