Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Syntactic, Prosodic, and Semantic Processes in the Brain: Evidence from Event-Related Neuroimaging

  • Published:
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The neural network supporting aspects of syntactic, prosodic, and semantic information processing is specified on the basis of two experiments using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). In these two studies, the presence/absence of lexical-semantic and syntactic information is systematically varied in spoken language stimuli. Inferior frontal and temporal brain areas in the left and the right hemisphere are identified to support different aspects of auditory language processing. Two additional experiments using event-related brain potentials investigate the possible interaction of syntactic and prosodic information, on the one hand, and syntactic and semantic information, on the other. While the first two information types were shown to interact early during processing, the latter two information types do not. Implications for models of auditory language comprehension are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Cabeza, R., & Nyberg, L. (2000). Imaging Cognition II: An Empirical Review of 275 PET and fMRI studies. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 1–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caplan, D., Alpert, N., & Waters, G. (1998). Effects of syntactic structure and propositional number on patterns of regional cerebral blood flow. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 541–552.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caplan, D., & Waters, G. S. (1999). Verbal working memory and sentence comprehension [Review]. Behavioral Brain Sciences, 22, 114–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dapretto, M., & Bookheimer, S. Y. (1999). Form and content: Dissociating syntax and semantics in sentence comprehension. Neuron, 24, 427–432.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dronkers, N. F., Wilkins, D. P., Redfem, B. B., Van Valin, J. R., & Jaeger, J. J. (1994). A reconsideration of the brain areas involved in the disruption of morphosyntactic comprehension. Brain and Language, 47, 461–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiez, J. A. (1997). Phonology, semantics, and the role of the left inferior prefrontal cortex. Human Brain Mapping, 5, 79–83.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frazier, L. (1978). On comprehending sentences: Syntactic parsing strategies. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Connecticut.

  • Frazier, L. (1987). Theories of sentence processing. In J. Garfield (Ed.), Modularity in knowledge representation and natural-language processing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frazier, L. (1995). Constraint satisfaction as a theory of sentence processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 24, 437–468.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frazier, L., & Fodor, J. D. (1978). The sausage machine: A new two-stage parsing model. Cognition, 6, 291–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friederici, A. D. (1995). The time course of syntactic activation during language processing: A model based on neuropsychological and neurophysiological data. Brain and Language, 50, 259–281.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Friederici, A. D. (1999). The neurobiology of language comprehension. In A. D. Friederici (Ed.), Language comprehension: A biological perspective,2nd (pp. 265–304). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friederici, A. D., Pfeifer, E., & Hahne, A. (1993). Event-related brain potentials during natural speech processing: Effects of semantic, morphological and syntactic violations. Cognitive Brain Research, 1, 183–192.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Friederici, A. D., Meyer, M., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2000a). Auditory language comprehension: An event-related fMRI study on the processing of syntactic and lexical information. Brain and Language, 74, 289–300.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Friederici, A. D., Opitz, B., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2000b). Segregating semantic and syntactic aspects of processing in the human brain: An fMRI investigation of different word types. Cerebral Cortex, 10, 698–705.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Friederici, A. D., Wang, Y., Herrmann, C. S., Maess, B., & Oertel, U. (2000c). Localisation of early syntactic processes in frontal and temporal cortical areas: An MEG study. Human Brain Mapping, 11(1), 1–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gorrell, P. (1995). Syntax and parsing. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunter, T. C., Friederici, A. D., & Schriefers, H. (2000). Syntactic gender and semantic expectancy: ERPs reveal early autonomy and late interaction. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 556–568.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hahne, A., & Friederici, A. D. (1999). Electrophysiological evidence for two steps in syntactic analysis: Early automatic and late controlled processes. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, 194–205.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hahne, A. & Friederici, A. D. (1998). ERP-evidence for autonomous first-pass parsing processes in auditory language comprehension. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, Supplement, 125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Just, M. A., Carpenter, P. A., Keller, T. A., Eddy, W. F., & Thulbom, K. R. (1996). Brain activation modulated by sentence comprehension. Science, 274, 114–116.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, M. C. (1993). The interaction of lexical and syntactic ambiguity. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 692–715.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, J. (1987). The case of interactionism in language processing. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading (pp. 3–36), Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marslen-Wilson, W. D., & Tyler, L. K. (1980). The temporal structure of spoken language understanding. Cognition, 8, 1–71.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marslen-Wilson, W. D., Tyler, L. K., Warren, P., Genier, P., & Lee, C. S. (1992). Prosodic effects in minimal attachment. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45A, 73–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazoyer, B. M., Tzourio, N., Frak, V., Syrota, A., Murayama, N., Levrier, O., Salamon, G., Dehaene, S., Cohen, L., & Mehler, J. (1993). The cortical representation of speech. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 5, 467–479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, M., Friederici, A. D., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2000). Neurocognition of auditory sentence comprehension: Event-related fMRI reveals sensitivity to syntactic violations and task demands. Cognitive Brain Research, 9, 19–33.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Müller, R.-A., Rothermel, R. D., Behen, M. E., Muzik, O., Mangner, T. J., & Chugani, H. T. (1997). Receptive and expressive language activations for sentences: A PET study. Neuroreport, 8, 3767–3770.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ni, W., Constable, R. T., Menci, W. E., Pugh, K. R., Fulbright, R. K., Shaywitz, S. E., Shaywitz, B. A., Gore, J. C., & Shankweiler, D. (2000). An Event-related Neuroimaging Study Distinguishing Form and Content in Sentence Processing. Journal of Cognitive Neurosciences, 12, 120–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pynte, J., & Prieur, B. (1996). Prosodic breaks and attachment decisions in sentence parsing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 11, 165–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlosser, M. J., Aoyagi, N., Fulbright R. K., Gore, J. C., & McCarthy, G. (1998). Functional MRI studies of auditory comprehension. Human Brain Mapping, 6, 1–13.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Speer, S. R., Kjelgaard, M. M., & Dobroth, K. M. (1996). The influence of prosodic structure on the resolution of temporary syntactic closure ambiguities. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 25, 247–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinhauer, K., Alter, K., & Friederici, A. D. (1999). Brain potentials indicate immediate use of prosodic cues in natural speech processing. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 191–196.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Steinhauer, K., Alter, K., Meyer, M., Friederici, A. D., & von Cramon (1999). Brain activation related to prosodic in natural speech: An event-related fMRI study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, Supplement, p. 54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stromswold, K., Caplan, D., Alpert, N., & Rauch, S. (1996). Localization of syntactic comprehension by positron emission tomography. Brain and Language, 52, 452–473.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson-Schill, S. L., D'Esposito, M., Aguirre, G. K., & Farah, M. J. (1997). Role of left inferior prefrontal cortex in retrieval of semantic knowledge: A reevaluation. Proceedings of the Natural Academy of Science USA, 94, 14792–14797.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, P., Grabe, E., & Nolan, F. (1995). Prosody, phonology, and parsing in closure ambiguities. Language and Cognitive Processes, 10, 457–486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watt S. M., & Murray W. S. (1996). Prosodic form and parsing commitment. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 25, 291–318.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Max Planck Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, Leipzig, Germany

    Angela D. Friederici

Authors
  1. Angela D. Friederici
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Friederici, A.D. Syntactic, Prosodic, and Semantic Processes in the Brain: Evidence from Event-Related Neuroimaging. J Psycholinguist Res 30, 237–250 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010438900737

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010438900737

Search

Navigation