Skip to main content
Log in

The Orthogenetic Principle in the Perception of “Forests” and “Trees”?

  • Published:
Journal of Adult Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study explores possible links between ontogenetic and microgenetic change (Werner, 1948, 1957) in the perception of stimuli with multiple levels of structure. Visual search for targets defined by local versus global structure was examined in observers aged 6, 8, 10, and 22 years. Perceptual access to each level of structure was varied by using pattern elements of same (easy) or opposite contrast polarity (hard); attentional processes were isolated from sensory processes by varying the number of display items. The results showed large improvements with age in search rates for global targets, with search rates for local targets being more constant over age. This pattern held regardless of whether perceptual access to a target was easy or hard. These results support the view that the perception of local and global structure involves different underlying processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Ames, L. B., Metraux, R. W., Rodell, J. L., & Walker, R. N. (1974). Child Rorschach responses: Developmental trends from two to ten years. New York: Brunner/Mazel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aslin, R. N. (1985). Oculomotor measures of visual development. In G. Gottlieb, N. Krasnegor (Eds.), Measurement of audition and vision in the first year of postnatal life: A methodological overview (pp. 391–417). Ablex Publishing Corp: Norwood NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aslin, R. N., & Smith, L. B. (1988). Perceptual development. Annual Review of Psychology, 39, 435–473.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austen, E. & Enns, J. T. (in press). The role of “gaze detail ” in change blindness during full and divided attention.

  • Burack, J. A. (1997). The study of atypical and typical populations in developmental psychopathology: The quest for a common science. In S. S. Luthar, J. A. Burack, D. Cicchetti, & J. R. Weisz (Eds.), Developmental Psychopathology: Perspectives on adjustment, risk and disorder (pp.139–165). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burack, J. A., Enns, J. T., Iarocci, G., & Randolph, B. (in press). Age differences in visual search for compound patterns: Long versus short range grouping, Developmental Psychology.

  • Cicchetti, D. (1984). The emergence of developmental psychopathology. Child Development, 55, 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cicchetti, D., Rogosh, F. A., & Toth, S. L. (1997). Ontogenesis, depressotypic organization, and the depressive spectrum. In S. S., Luthar, J. A., Burack, D. Cicchetti, J. R Weisz (Eds.), Developmental psychopathology: Perspectives on adjustment, risk and disorder (pp. 273–316). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L. B., & Younger, B. A. (1984). Infant perception of angular relations. Infant Behavior & Development, 7, 37–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coren, S., Ward, L. M., & Enns, J. T. (1999). Sensation & perception (5th ed.). New York: Harcourt Brace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review, 96, 433–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enns, J. T. (1990). Relations between components of visual attention. In J. T. Enns (Ed.), The development of attention: Research and theory (pp. 139–158). New York: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enns, J. T., & Burack, J. A. (1997). Attention, development and psychopathology: Bridging disciplines. In J. A. Burack & J. T. Enns (Eds.), Attention, development and psychopathology (pp. 3–28). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enns, J. T., & Girgus, J. S. (1985). Developmental changes in selective and integrative visual attention. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 40, 319–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enns, J. T., & Kingstone, A. (1995). Access to global and local properties in visual search for compound stimuli. Psychological Science, 6, 283–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enns, J. T., & Kingstone, A. (1995). Access to global and local properties in visual search for compound stimuli. Psychological Science, 6, 283–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fantz, R. L. (1961). The origin of form perception. Scientific American, 204, 66–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghent, L. (1956). Perception of overlapping and embedded figures by children of different ages. American Journal of Psychology, 69, 575–587.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghim, H., & Eimas, P. D. (1988). Global and local processing by 3-and 4-month-old infants. Perception & Psychophysics, 43, 165–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, E. J. (1969). Principles of perceptual learning and development. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, E. J., Gibson, J. J., Pick, A. D., Osser, H. A. (1962). A developmental study of the discrimination of letter-like forms. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 55, 897–906.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. H., & Vecera, S. P. (1996). Cortical differentiation and neurocognitive development: The parcellation conjecture. Behavioural Processes, 36, 195–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemler, D. G. (1989). The nature and occurence of holistic processing. In B. E. Shepp & S. Ballestros (Eds.), Object perception: Structure & process (pp. 357–386). Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimchi, R. (1992). Primacy of wholistic processing and global/ local paradigm: A critical review. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 24–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinchla, R. A., & Wolfe, J. M. (1979). The order of visual processing: “Top down ”, “bottom up” or “middle out.” Perception and Psychophysics, 25, 225–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamb, M. R., & Robertson, L. C. (1990). The effect of visual angle on global and local reaction times depends on the set of visual angles presented. Perception and Psychophysics, 47, 489–496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, M. (1979). Local and global processing: The role of sparsity. Memory & Cognition, 7, 476–484.

    Google Scholar 

  • Navon, D. (1977). Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 353–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Navon, D. (1981a). Do attention and decision follow perception? Comment on Miller. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 1175–1182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Navon, D. (1981b). The forest revisited: More on global precedence. Psychological Research, 43, 132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Navon, D. (1983). How many trees does it take to make a forest? Perception, 12, 239–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plude, D., Enns, J. T., & Brodeur, D. A. (1994). The development of selective attention:Alife span overview. Acta Psychologica, 86, 227–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, P. C., & Eimas, P. D. (1986). Pattern-line effects and units of visual processing in infants. Infant Behavior & Development, 9, 57–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepp, B. E. (1978). From perceived similarity to dimensional structure: A new hypothesis about perceptual development. In E. Rosch & B. Lloyd (Eds.), On the nature and principle of formation of categories. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. D., (1989). Analytic and holistic processing in categorization. In B. E. Shepp & S. Ballestros (Eds.), Object perception: Structure & process (pp. 297–323). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L. B. (1991). A model of perceptual classification in children and adults. Psychological Review, 96, 125–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. D., & Kemler, D. G. (1977). Developmental trends in free classification: Evidence for a new conceptualization of perceptual development. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 22, 279–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spelke, E. S. & Breinlinger, K. (1993). Gestalt relations and object perception: A developmental study. Perception, 22, 1483–1501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, S. (1969). The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donder's method. Acta Psychologica, 30, 276–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiles, J., Delis, D. C., & Tada, W. (1991). Global and local processing in preschool children. Child Development, 61, 1258–1275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Titchener, E. (1909). Experimental psychology of the thought process. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treisman, A., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trick, L. M., & Enns, J. T. (1997). Clusters precede shapes in perceptual organization. Psychological Science, 8, 124–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uttal, W. R. (1994). Pattern recognition. In V. S. Ramachandran (Ed.), The encyclopedia of human behaviour (Vol. 3, pp. 421–429). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, L. M. (1982). Determinants of attention to local and global features of visual forms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 562–581.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, L. M. (1983). On processing dominance: Comment on Pomerantz. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 112, 541–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, T. B. (1988). When is category learning holistic? A reply to Kemler-Nelson. Memory and Cognition, 16, 85–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, T. B., & Scott, J. (1987). Analytic and holistic modes of learning family-resemblance concepts. Memory and Cognition, 15, 42–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, T. B., & Vela, E. (1986). Classifying color materials: Children are less holistic than adults. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 42, 273–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werker, J. (1991) The ontogeny of speech perception. In I. G. Mattingly, M. Studdert-Kennedy (Eds.), Modularity and the motor theory of speech perception (pp. 99–109). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, H. (1948). Comparative psychology of mental development. New York: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, H. (1957). The concept of development from a comparative and organismic point of view. In D. B. Harris (Ed.), The concept of development (pp. 125–148). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertheimer, M. (1955). Gestalt theory. In W. D. Ellis (Ed.), A source book of Gestalt psychology (pp. 1–11). New York: Humanities Press (Originally published in 1925).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickens, C. D. (1974). Temporal limits of human information processing: A developmental study. Psychological Bulletin, 81, 739–755.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, J. M., Cave, K. R., & Franzel, S. L. (1989). Guided search: An alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 419–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaporozhets, A. V. (1965). Psychology (3rd ed). Moscow: Prosveshchenie.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Enns, J.T., Burack, J.A., Iarocci, G. et al. The Orthogenetic Principle in the Perception of “Forests” and “Trees”?. Journal of Adult Development 7, 41–48 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009503118377

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009503118377

Navigation