Skip to main content
Log in

Applying a Family-Ecosystemic Model to Reunite a Family Separated Due to Child Abuse: A Case Study

  • Published:
Contemporary Family Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Family reunification following the removal of a child due to child abuse is a challenging process. In this case study the authors demonstrate the success of a family-ecosystemic intervention for achieving the reintegration of an adolescent into her family following a court-imposed separation. The SET (Structural Ecosytems Therapy) model was used to: (1) repair family bonds, (2) build collaborations among the agencies involved in overseeing the child's welfare, and (3) build an alliance between the mother and agency personnel. This case study suggests that facilitating such collaborations can be helpful in the evaluation and follow-through of high risk cases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Amaro, H. (1995). Love, sex, and power. American Psychologist, 50(6), 437-447.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aponte, H. (1976). The family-school interview: An ecostructural approach. Family Process, 15(3), 303-311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aponte, H., & Van Deusen, J. (1981). Structural family therapy. In A. S. Gurman & D. P. Kniskern (Eds.), Handbook of family therapy (pp. 310-360). NewYork: Brunner/Mazel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auerswald, E. (1968). Interdisciplinary versus ecological approach. Family Process, 1, 202-215

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1977). Toward an experimental ecology of human development. American Psychologist, 32, 513-531.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1986). The ecology of the family as a context for human development. Developmental Psychology, 22, 723-742.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelles, R. J. (1983). An exchange/social control theory. In D. Finkelhor, R. J. Gelles, G. T. Hotaling, & M. A. Strauss (Eds.), The dark side of families (pp. 151-165). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haley, J. (1976). Problem-solving therapy. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henggeler, S. W. & Borduin, C. M. (1990). Family therapy and beyond: A multisystemic approach to treating the behavior problems of children and adolescents. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henggeler, S. W., Melton, G. B., & Smith, L. A. (1992). Family preservation using multisystemic therapy: An effective alternative to incarcerating serious juvenile offenders. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 60, 953-961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, E. (1994). Child maltreatment: can it e defined? In R. Barth, J. D. Berrick, & N. Gilbert (Eds.), Child welfare research review (pp. 1-23). New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurtines, W. M., & Szapocznik, J. (1996). Family interaction patterns: Structural family therapy within contexts of cultural diversity. In E. D. Hibbs & P. S. Jensen (Eds.), Psychological treatments for child and adolescent disorders: Empirically based strategies for clinical practice (pp. 671-696). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landy, S., & Munro, S. (1997). Shared parenting: assessing the success of a foster parent program aimed at family reunification. Child Abuse and Neglect, 22(4), 305-318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madanes, C. (1981). Strategic family therapy. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. B. (1986). Toward a new psychology of women. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minuchin, S. (1974). Families and family therapy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minuchin, S., & Fishman, H. C. (1981). Family therapy techniques. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minuchin, S., Montalvo, B., Guerney, B. G., Rosman, B. L. & Schumer, F. (1967). Families of the slums. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minuchin, S., Rosman, B. L., & Baker, L. (1978). Psychosomatic families: Anorexia nervosa in context. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitrani, V. B., Szapocznik, J., & Robinson-Batista, C. (In press). Structural ecosystems therapy with seropositive African American mothers. In W. Pequegnat & J. Szapocznik (Eds.), Inside families: the role of families in preventing and adapting to HIV/ AIDS (pp. 671-696). Rockville, MD: National Institute of Mental Health.

  • Pinderhughes, E. B. (1997). The interaction of difference and power as a basic framework for understanding work with African Americans: Family theory, empowerment and educational approaches. Smith College Studies in Social Work, 67(3), 323-347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sameroff, A., & Fiese, B. H. (1990). Transactional regulation and early intervention. In S. J. Meisels & J. P. Shonkoff (Eds.), Handbook of Early Childhood Intervention (pp. 119-150). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santisteban, D. A., Szapocznik, J., Perez-Vidal, A., Kurtines, W. M., Murray E. J., & LaPerroere, A. (1996). Engaging behavior problem drug abusing youth and their families into treatment: An investigation of the efficacy of specialized engagement interventions and factors that contribute to differential effectiveness. Journal of Family Psychology, 10(1), 35-44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szapocznik, J., & COSSMHO (1994). Structural family therapy. In J. Szapocznik (Ed.), A Hispanic family approach to substance abuse prevention (pp. 41-74). Rockville, MD: Center for Substance Abuse Prevention.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szapocznik, J., & Kurtines, W. M. (1989). Breakthroughs in family therapy with drug abusing problem youth. New York: Springer Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szapocznik, J., & Kurtines, W. M. (1993). Family psychology and cultural diversity: Opportunities for theory, research, and application. [Invited Article] American Psychologist, 48(4), 400-407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szapocznik, J., & Mancilla, Y. (1995). Rainforests, families, and communities: Ecological perspectives on exile, return and reconstruction. In W. J. O'Neill (Ed.), Family: The first imperative. A symposium in search of root causes of family strength and family disintegration (pp. 279-294). Cleveland, OH: The William J. and Dorothy K. O'Neill Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szapocznik, J., Perez-Vidal, A., Hervis, O., Brickman, A. L., & Kurtines, W. (1990). Innovations in family therapy: Overcoming resistance to treatment. In R. A. Wells & V. A. Gianetti (Eds.), Handbook of brief psychotherapy (pp. 93-114). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sazpocznik, J., Rio, A. T., Hervis, O. E., Mitrani, V. B., Kurtines, W. M., & Faraci, A. M. (1991). Assessing change in family functioning as a result of treatment: The structural family systems rating scale (SFSR). Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 17(3), 295-310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szapocznik, J., Scopetta, M. A., Aranalde, M. A., & Kurtines, W. (1978). Cuban value structure: Clinical implications. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46(5), 961-970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szapocznik, J., Scopetta, M. A., Ceballos, A., & Santisteban, D. (1994). Understanding, supporting and empowering families: From microanalysis to macrointervention. The Family Psychologist, 43 (10, No. 2), 23-26.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nelson, R.H., Mitrani, V.B. & Szapocznik, J. Applying a Family-Ecosystemic Model to Reunite a Family Separated Due to Child Abuse: A Case Study. Contemporary Family Therapy 22, 125–146 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007722501848

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007722501848

Navigation