Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Policy mechanisms for supply chain coordination

  • Published:
IIE Transactions

Abstract

The problem is to determine a review period and stocking policy that are mutually beneficial to a producer and a retailer. In our model, the retailer uses a periodic review, base stock policy for ordering the item from the producer's Distribution Center (DC). Excess customer demand is assumed to be lost. A make-to-order production system supplies to the DC. We show that given a review period, unless the manufacturer agrees to share the cost of carrying a fraction of the safety stocks at the retailer, the two will not agree upon the level of stocks to be carried in the store. We prove that there is an equilibrium value for this fraction, such that the retailer and the manufacturer are always in agreement with regard to the stocking level. We then show that complete coordination on the stocking level as well as the review period can be achieved solely through carrying out negotiations on credit terms. These theoretical results are used to construct an algorithm for calculating the optimal policy parameters for a supply chain. As part of the analysis we suggest a modification of the base stock policy for the positive lag lost sales case of periodic review inventory models that consistently outperforms the base stock policy in our numerical studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gupta, Y.P. and Neel, G.A. (1992) The origin of EDI and changes associated with its implementation. IIE Solutions, 24(8), 25–29.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wang, E.T.G. and Seidmann, A. (1995) Electronic data interchange: competitive externalities and strategic implementation policies. Management Science, 41, 401–418.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Goyal, S.K. and Gupta, Y.P. (1989) Integrated inventory models: the buyer-vendor coordination, European Journal of Operational Research, 41, 261–169.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dolan, R.J. (1987) Quantity discounts: managerial issues and research opportunities, Marketing Science, 30, 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Monahan, J.P. (1984) A quantity discount pricing model to increase vendor profits. Management Science, 30, 720–726.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Joglekar, P.N. (1988) Comments on ``A quantity discount pricing model to increase vendor profits. Management Science, 34, 1393–1398.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dada, M. and Srikanth, K.N. (1987) Pricing policies for quantity discounts, Management Science, 33, 1247–1252.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lee, H.L. and Rosenblatt, M.J. (1986) A generalized quantity discount pricing model to increase supplier's profits. Management Science, 32, 1177–1185.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Weng, Z.K. (1995) Channel coordination and quantity discounts. Management Science, 41, 1509–1522.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kohli, R. and Park, H. (1994) Coordinating buyer-seller transactions across multiple products. Management Science, 40, 1145–1150.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Spengler, J. (1950) Vertical integration and anti-trust policy. Journal of Political Economy, 58, 347–352.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Anupindi, R. and Bassok, Y. (1994) Centralization of stocks: retailer vs. manufacturer. Technical Report, J. L. Kellog School of Management, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Parlar, M. (1988) Game theoretic analysis of the substitutable product inventory problem with random demands. Naval Research Logistics, 35, 397–409.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wang, Q. and Parlar, M. (1994) A three-person game theory model arising in stochastic inventory control theory. European Journal of Operational Research, 76(1), 83–97.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ernst, R. and Cohen, M.A. (1992) Coordination alternatives in a manufacturer/dealer/inventory system under stochastic demand. Production and Operations Management, 1, 254–268.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ernst, R. and Powell, S.G. (1992) Manufacturer's incentives to improve retail service levels. Working Paper number 282, (1987) The Amos Tuck School of Business Administration, Dartmouth College, NH 03755.

  17. Pasternak, B.A. (1985) Optimal pricing and return policies for perishable commodities. Marketing Science, 4, 166–176.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kandel, E. (1996) The right to return, Journal of Law and Economics, 39, 329–56.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Padmanabhan, V. and Png, I.P.L. (1997) Manufacturer's return policies and retail competition. Marketing Science, 16, 81–94.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Allen, S.G. (1958) Redistribution of total stock over several user locations, Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 5, 51–59.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Clark, A.J. and Scarf, H.E. (1960) Optimal policies for a multiehelon inventory problem. Management Science, 6, 475–490.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Clark, A.J. and Scarf, H.E. (1962) Approximate solutions to a simple multi-echelon inventory problem in Studies in Applied Probability and Management Science, Arrow, K.J., Karlin S. and Scarf, H. (eds.), Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA, pp. 88–100.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Federgruen, A. and Zipkin, P. (1984) Approximations of dynamic multilocation production and inventory problems. Management Science, 30(1), 69–84.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Nahmias, S. (1993) Mathematical models of retailer inventory systems: an overview, in Perspectives in Operations Management: Essays in Honor of Elwood S. Buffa, Sarin, R.K. (ed.), Kluwer Academic Press, Boston, MA. pp. 249–278.

    Google Scholar 

  25. McGavin, E.J., Schwarz, L.B. and Ward, J.E. (1993) Two-interval inventory allocation policies in a one-warehouse N-identical retailer distribution system. Management Science, 39, 1092–1107.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Nahmias, S. and Smith, S.A. (1994) Optimizing inventory levels in a two-echelon retailer system with partial lost sales. Management Science, 40, 582–596.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hadley, G. and Whitin, T.M. (1963) Analysis of Inventory Systems, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, pp. 237–242.

  28. Buzacott, J.A. and Shanthikumar, J.G. (1993) Stochastic Models of Manufacturing Systems, John Wiley, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Silver, E.A. and Peterson, R. (1985) Decision Systems for Inventory Management and Production Planning, 2nd. ed., John Wiley, NY, p. 290.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Karlin, S. and Scarf, H.E. (1958) Optimal inventory policy for the Arrow-Harris-Marschak dynamic model with a time lag in Studies in the Mathematical Theory of Inventory and Production, Arrow, K.J., Karlin, S. and Scarf, H. (eds.), Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA, Ch. 10, pp. 155–178.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kaplan, R. (1970) A dynamic inventory model with stochastic lead times, Management Science, 16, 491–507.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Morton, T.E. (1971) The near-myopic nature of the lagged-proportional-cost inventory problem with lost sales. Operations Research, 19, 1708–1716.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Nahmias, S. (1979) Simple approximations for a variety of dynamic lead-time lost-sales inventory models. Operations Research, 27, 904–924.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Ehrhardt, R. (1984) (s; S) policies for a dynamic inventory model with stochastic lead-times. Operations Research, 32, 121–132.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Zipkin, P. (1986) Stochastic lead-times in continuous-time inventory models. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 33, 763–774.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Hax, A.C. and Candea, D. (1984) Production and Inventory Management, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Wilson, R. (1968) The theory of syndicates. Econometrica, 36, 119–132.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Kohli, R. and Park, H. (1989) A cooperative game theory model of quantity discounts. Management Science, 35, 693–707.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Morton, T.E. and Pentico, D. (1995) The finite horizon nonstationary stochastic inventory problem: near myopic bounds, heuristics and testing. Management Science, 41, 334–343.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Hart, O. and Holmstrom, B. (1987) The theory of contracts, in Advances in Economic Theory, Bewley T. (ed), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, Ch. 3, pp. 71–159.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Farrell, J. (1987) Information and the Coase theorem, Economic Perspectives, 1, 113–129.

    Google Scholar 

  42. van Damme, E. (1996) Stability and Perfection of Nash Equilibrium, 2nd edn., Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Elsgolts, L. (1970) Differential Equations and the Calculus of Variations, Mir Publishers, Moscow.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Operations Management Department, Leonard N. Stern School of Business, New York University, NY, 10012, USA

    Michael Moses & Sridhar Seshadri

Authors
  1. Michael Moses
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sridhar Seshadri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moses, M., Seshadri, S. Policy mechanisms for supply chain coordination. IIE Transactions 32, 245–262 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007646531546

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007646531546

Keywords

Search

Navigation