Skip to main content
Log in

Lectin like properties and differential sugar binding characteristics of C-reactive proteins purified from sera of normal and pollutant induced Labeo rohita

  • Published:
Glycoconjugate Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Different forms of C-reactive proteins (CRPs) have been purified to electrophoretic homogeneity from the sera of Labeo rohita confined in freshwater (CRPN) and water polluted with nonlethal doses of cadmium (CRPCd) or mercury (CRPHg). CRPN[emsp4 ], CRPCd[emsp4 ], and CRPHg show remarkable differences in their electrophoretic mobility but exhibit strong immunological cross reactivity. All these CRPs exhibit variable agglutination properties with erythrocytes from diverse sources in presence of Ca+2, which could be inhibited by a variety of sugars showing specificity for galactose. Inhibition results show that the potency of galactose as an inhibitor increases about 4 fold in the process of transformation of CRPN to CRPCd and CRPHg[emsp4 ]. In case of CRPN[emsp4 ], Gal β(1→1) Gal and oNO2 phenyl β-Gal show highest inhibitory potency while oNO2-phenyl β-Gal is the most potent inhibitor for CRPCd and CRPHg but the potency of Gal β(1→1) Gal reduced drastically. 6-phosphate D-Gal and stachyose are 20 times weaker inhibitors than D-Gal for induced CRP mediated agglutination, in contrast, these sugars are only 6 times weaker for CRPN[emsp4 ]. Dissociation constants of the binding of CRPN with phosphoryl choline (PC) and galactose are about 9[emsp4 ]mM and PC binding causes a change in the α and β conformations of these CRPs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shrive AK, Cheetham GMT, Holden D, Myles DAA, Turnell WG, Volanakis JE, Pepys MB, Bloomer AC, Greenhough TJ (1996) Nature Structural Biol. 3: 346–54 and references therein.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Armstrong PB, Swarnakar S, Srimal S, Misquith S, Hahn EA, Aimes RT, Quigley JP (1996) J Biol Chem 271: 14717–21

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mandal C, Biswas M, Nagpurkar A, Mookerjea S (1991) Dev. Comp. Immunol. 15: 227–39 and references therein.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sinha S, Mandal C (1996) Biochem Biophys Res Commun 226: 681–7

    Google Scholar 

  5. Paul I, Mandal C, Mandal C (1998) Dev Comp Immunol 22: 519–32.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Pepys M B (1981) Lancet i: 653–7

    Google Scholar 

  7. Volanakis JE, Narketes AJ (1982) J Immunol 126: 1820–7

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gotschlich EC, Liu TY, Olivera E (1982) Ann NY Acad Sci 389: 163–71

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mold C, Rodgers CP, Kaplan RL, Gewurz H (1982) Infect Immun 38: 392–5

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kottgen E, Hell B, Kage A, Tauber R (1992) J Immunol 149: 445–53

    Google Scholar 

  11. Nunomura W (1991) Biochim Biophys Acta 1076: 191–6

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ (1951) J Biol Chem 193: 265–75

    Google Scholar 

  13. Davis BJ (1964) Ann NY Acad Sci 121: 404–27

    Google Scholar 

  14. Laemmli UK, Favre M (1973) J. Mol. Bio. 80: 575–579

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ouchterlony O (1948) Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand 25: 186–91

    Google Scholar 

  16. Maruyama K, Mikawa T, Ebashi S (1984) J Biochem 95: 511–9

    Google Scholar 

  17. Basu S, Sarkar M, Mandal C (1986) Mol Cell Biochem 71: 149–57

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sen, G., Mandal, C. (1995) Carbohydrate Res 268, 115–25.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mandal C, Basu S, Mandal C (1989) Biochem J 257: 65–71

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hunter WM (1978) in: Handbook of Experimental Medicine (Weir, D.M. ed.) 14.1–14.3, Blackwell Pub., Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mazumdar A, Chatterjee R, Adak S, Ghosh A, Mandal C, Banerjee R (1996) Biochem J 314: 413–9

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lasson A, Goransson J (1999) Scand J Clin Lab investigation 59: 293–304

    Google Scholar 

  23. Feize T (1984) Biochem Soc Transactions 12: 545–9

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kottgen E, Hell B, Kaga A, Tauber R (1992) J Immunol 149, 445–53.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Soelter J, Uhlenbruck G (1986) Immunology 58: 139–44.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Agarwal A, Xu Y, Ansardi D, Macon KJ, Volanakis JE (1992) J Biol Chem 267: 25352–8.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mandal, C., Sinha, S. & Mandal, C. Lectin like properties and differential sugar binding characteristics of C-reactive proteins purified from sera of normal and pollutant induced Labeo rohita. Glycoconj J 16, 741–750 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007167611778

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007167611778

Navigation