Skip to main content
Log in

The State and Fate of Nations: Implications of Subjective Measures of Personal and Social Quality of Life

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

The equation of `more’ with `better’ – ofstandard of living with quality of life – is at theheart of a growing international debate aboutindicators of progress. At one level, the debate isabout the adequacy of GDP (Gross Domestic Product) asthe dominant indicator of national performance. However, the debate also reaches far beyond thisquestion to challenge conventional thinking aboutprogress. Quality of life includes both objective andsubjective elements, so indicators of progress shouldinclude measures of how people feel about their lives.Drawing mainly on Australian data – but also on USand international studies – this analysis examines anddifferentiates between subjective measures of personal and social quality of life, anddiscusses their use in evaluating whether life isgetting better – or worse.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AVS (Australian Values Study): 1983, Data collected by Roy Morgan Research Centre. AVS Steering Committee, Melbourne, (producer), 1984 (Social Science Data Archives, the Australian National University, Canberra, (distributor)) 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basanez, M., R. Inglehart and A. Moreno: 1998, Human Values and Beliefs: A Cross-Cultural Sourcebook (University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z.: 1995, Life in Fragments: Essays in Postmodern Morality (Blackwell, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • BusinessWeek: 1995, ‘Portrait of an anxious public’, BusinessWeek/Harris Poll, 13 March, p. 44.

  • BusinessWeek: 1996, ‘America, land of the shaken’, BusinessWeek/Harris Poll, 11 March, pp. 42–43.

  • Center for a New American Dream: 1995, Yearning for Balance, Report prepared by the Harwood Group, commissioned by the Merck Family Fund (Center for a New American Dream, Takoma Park, MD), www.newdream.org

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, K.: 1993, Civilization. Four-volume video series, BBC Enterprises Ltd.

  • Clemenger/BBDO: 1997, The Silent Majority III – The Everyday Problems of the Average Australian, Clemenger Report, August.

  • Cobb, C., H. Halstead and J. Rowe: 1995, ‘If the GDP is up, why is America down?’, The Atlantic Monthly, October, pp. 59–78.

  • Cummins, R. A.: 1995, ‘On the trail of the gold standard for subjective well-being’, Social Indicators Research 35, pp. 179–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, R. A.: 1998, ‘The second approximation to an international standard for life satisfaction’, Social Indicators Research 43, pp. 307–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, R. A.: 1999, ‘Normative life satisfaction: Measurement issues and a homeostatic model’, in B. Zumbo (ed.), Methodological Developments and Issues in Quality of Life Research (Kluwar, Amsterdam) (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckersley, R.: 1998, ‘Perspectives on progress: Economic growth, quality of life and ecological sustainability’, in R. Eckersley (ed.), Measuring Progress: Is Life Getting Better? (CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, Victoria).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Eckersley, R.: 1999a, ‘Quality of Life in Australia’ (The Australia Institute, discussion paper, Canberra, Australia).

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckersley, R.: 1999b, ‘Dreams and expectations: Young people’s expected and preferred futures and their significance for education’, Futures 31, pp. 73–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallup: 1998, ‘Haves and Have-Nots: Perceptions of Fairness and Opportunity 1998’, Gallup Poll Social Audit, The Gallup Organization, Princeton. Some details of the audit and the results of the ‘satisfaction with the US’ question can be obtained from Gallup's website, www.gallup.com

    Google Scholar 

  • Halstead, T.: 1998, ‘The science and politics of new measures of progress: A United States perspective’, in R. Eckersley (ed.), Measuring Progress: Is Life Getting Better? (CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, Victoria).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamer, D.: 1996, ‘The heritability of happiness’, Nature Genetics 14, pp. 125–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, C.: 1998, ‘Measuring changes in economic welfare: The Genuine Progress Indicator for Australia’, in R. Eckersley (ed.), Measuring Progress: Is Life Getting Better? (CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, Victoria).

    Google Scholar 

  • Headey, B. and A. Wearing: 1988, ‘The sense of relative superiority – central to well-being’, Social Indicators Research 20, pp. 497–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, J.: 1998, Address to the World Economic Forum Dinner, Melbourne, 16 March, Press Office of the Prime Minister, Parliament House, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, J., C. S. Bean, M. D. R. Evans and K. Zagorski: 1995, ‘Australia 1995: International Social Science Survey’, Codebook and machine readable data file (preliminary)’. Canberra: Institute of Advanced Studies, Australian National University. (Date collection was supported by grants from the Research School of Social Sciences, the Australian National University.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackay, H.: 1995, Society Now, The Mackay Report, June.

  • Mackay, H.: 1997, ‘Prophet-less PM sees stocks crash’, TheWeekend Australian, 1–2 November, p. 2.

  • Mackay, H.: 1998, Mind & Mood, The Mackay Report, June.

  • Max-Neef, M.: 1995, ‘Economic growth and quality of life: A threshold hypothesis’, Ecological Economics 15, pp. 115–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, D. and E. Diener: 1996, ‘The pursuit of happiness’, Scientific American 274(5), May, pp. 54–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NCAVAC: 1998, Fear of Crime, Summary volume and report findings, National Campaign Against Violence and Crime, Attorney-General’s Department, Commonwealth of Australia.

  • Nistico, H. and R. A. Cummins: 2000, ‘Maintaining life satisfaction: The role of cognitive illusions’, Clinical Psychology Review (in press).

  • Pusey, M.: 1998a, ‘Incomes, standards of living and quality of life: Preliminary findings of the Middle Australia Project’, in R. Eckersley (ed.), Measuring Progress: Is Life Getting Better? (CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, Victoria).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pusey, M.: 1998b, ‘The impact of economic restructuring on women and families: preliminary findings from the Middle Australia Project’, Australian Quarterly, July–August, pp. 18–27; personal communication.

  • Tuchman, B.: 1989, A Distant Mirror – the Calamitous 14th Century, Papermac, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uslaner, E. M.: 1993, The Decline of Comity in Congress (The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor).

    Google Scholar 

  • Uslaner, E. M.: 1998, ‘Social capital, television, and the “mean world”: Trust, optimism, and civic participation’, Political Psychology 19, pp. 441–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uslaner, E. M.: (in press), ‘Democracy and social capital’, in M. Warren (ed.), Democracy and Trust (provisional title) (Cambridge University Press).

  • Washington Post/Kaiser/Harvard Survey Project: 1998, ‘American values: 1998 survey of Americans on values’, Kaiser Family Foundation, www.kff.org

  • Wearing, A. and B. Headey: 1998, ‘Who enjoys life and why: measuring subjective well-being’, in R. Eckersley (ed.), Measuring Progress: Is Life Getting Better? (CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, Victoria).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eckersley, R. The State and Fate of Nations: Implications of Subjective Measures of Personal and Social Quality of Life. Social Indicators Research 52, 3–27 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007071621613

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007071621613

Keywords

Navigation