Skip to main content
Log in

The Role of Gesture in Children's Comprehension of Spoken Language:Now They Need It, Now They Don't

  • Published:
Journal of Nonverbal Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two experiments investigated gesture as a form of external support for spoken language comprehension. In both experiments, children selected blocks according to a set of videotaped instructions. Across trials, the instructions were given using no gesture, gestures that reinforced speech, and gestures that conflicted with speech. Experiment 1 used spoken messages that were complex for preschool children but not for kindergarten children. Reinforcing gestures facilitated speech comprehension for preschool children but not for kindergarten children, and conflicting gestures hindered comprehension for kindergarten children but not for preschool children. Experiment 2 tested preschool children with simpler spoken messages. Unlike Experiment 1, preschool children's comprehension was not facilitated by reinforcing gestures. However, children's comprehension also was not hindered by conflicting gestures. Thus, the effects of gesture on speech comprehension depend both on the relation of gesture to speech, and on the complexity of the spoken message.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alibali, M. W., Sylvan, E. A., Fujimori, Y., & Kawanaka, T. (1997, May). The functions of teachers' gestures: What's the point? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago, Illinois.

  • Allen, R., & Shatz, M. (1983). “What says meow?”: The role of context and linguistic experience in very young children's responses to what-questions. Journal of Child Language, 10, 321–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, K. W., & Popelka, G. R. (1971). Extra-facial gestures in relation to speechreading. Journal of Communication Disorders, 3, 302–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bisanz, J., Danner, F., & Resnick, L. (1979). Changes with age in measures of processing efficiency. Child Development, 50, 132–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyatzis, C. J., & Satyaprasad, C. (1994). Children's facial and gestural decoding and encoding: Relations between skills and with popularity. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 18, 37–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Case, R., Kurland, D. M., & Goldberg, J. (1982). Operational efficiency and the growth of short-term memory span. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 33, 386–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, R. S. (1978). Comprehension strategies in children. In J. F. Kavanagh & W. Strange (Eds.), Speech and language in laboratory, school, and clinic (pp. 308–327). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Church, R. B., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (1986). The mismatch between gesture and speech as an index of transitional knowledge. Cognition, 23, 43–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R., Hutcheson, S., & Van Buren, P. (1974). Comprehension and production in language acquisition. Journal of Linguistics, 10, 39–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, K. W., & Bidell, T. R. (1998). Dynamic development of psychological structures in action and thought. In W. Damon (Series Ed.) & R. Lerner (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology, Vol. 1: Theoretical models of human development (pp. 467–561). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furuyama, N. (in press). Gestural interaction between the instructor and the learner in origami instruction. In D. McNeill (Ed.), Language and gesture: Window into thought and action. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

  • Glenberg, A. M., & Robertson, D. A. (1999). Indexical understanding of instructions. Discourse Processes, 28, 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldin-Meadow, S., Singer, M., & Kim, S. (1999). What the teachers' hands tell the students' minds about math. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 720–730.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, J. A., & Heywood, S. (1976). The effects of elimination of hand gesture and of verbal codability on speech performance. European Journal of Social Psychology, 5, 189–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halford, G. (1993). Children's understanding: The development of mental models. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodapp, R. M., Goldfield, E. C., & Boyatzis, C. J. (1984). The use and effectiveness of maternal scaffolding in mother-infant games. Child Development, 55, 772–781.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoots, M. A., McAndrew, F. T., & Francois, G. R. (1989). Decoding of gestures by kindergarten, first-and third-grade children. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 150, 117–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99, 122–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, S. D., & Church, R. B. (1998). A comparison between children's and adults' ability to detect conceptual information conveyed through representational gestures. Child Development, 69, 85–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krauss, R. M., Dushay, R., Chen, Y., & Rauscher, F. (1995). The communicative value of conversational hand gestures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 533–552.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krauss, R. M., & Glucksberg, S. (1969). The development of communication competence as a function of age. Child Development, 40, 255–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krauss, R. M., Morrel-Samuels, P., & Colasante, C. (1991). Do conversational hand gestures communicate? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 743–754.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lickiss, K. P., & Wellens, R. (1978). Effects of visual accessibility and hand restraint on fluency of gesticulator and effectiveness of message. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 46, 925–926.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macnamara, J. (1977). From sign to language. In J. Macnamara (Ed.), Language learning and thought (pp. 11–35). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morford, M., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (1992). Comprehension and production of gesture in combination with speech in one-word speakers. Journal of Child Language, 19, 559–580.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muschisky, M., Gershkoff-Stowe, L., Cole, E., & Thelen, E. (1996). The epigenetic landscape revisited: A dynamic interpretation. In C. Rovee-Collier & L. P. Lipsitt (Eds.), Advances in infancy research (pp. 121–159). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Reilly, A. W. (1995). Using representations: Comprehension and production of actions with imagined objects. Child Development, 66, 999–1010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, M., Berch, D., & Singleton, J. (1995). Constructing shared understanding: The role of nonverbal input in learning contexts. Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues, 6, 213–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regier, T. (1997). Constraints on the learning of spatial terms: A computational investigation. In D. Medin, P. Schyns, & R. Goldstone (Eds.), Psychology of learning and motivation, Vol. 36: Mechanisms of perceptual learning (pp. 171–217). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riseborough, M. G. (1981). Physiographic gestures as decoding facilitators: Three experiments exploring a neglected facet of communication. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 5, 172–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, W. T. (1978). The contribution of kinesic illustrators toward the comprehension of verbal behavior within utterances. Human Communication Research, 5, 54–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tfouni, L. V., & Klatzky, R. L. (1983). A discourse analysis of deixis: Pragmatic, semantic, and cognitive factors in the comprehension of “this,” “that,” “here” and “there”. Journal of Child Language, 10, 123–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thelen, E. (1989). Self-organization in developmental processes: Can systems approaches work? In M. Gunnar & E. Thelen (Eds.), Minnesota symposium on child psychology: Vol. 22, Systems and development (pp. 77–117). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thelen, E., & Smith, L. B. (1994). A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, L. A., & Massaro, D. W. (1986). Evaluation and integration of speech and pointing gestures during referential understanding. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 42, 144–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, L. A., & Massaro, D. W. (1994). Children's integration of speech and pointing gestures in comprehension. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 57, 327–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Lely, H., & Dewart, H. (1986). Sentence comprehension strategies in specifically language impaired children. British Journal of Disorders of Communication, 21, 291–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volkmar, F. R., & Siegel, A. E. (1982). Responses to consistent and discrepant social communications. In R. S. Feldman (Ed.), Development of nonverbal behavior in children (pp. 231–255). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D. J., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17, 89–100.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McNeil, N.M., Alibali, M.W. & Evans, J.L. The Role of Gesture in Children's Comprehension of Spoken Language:Now They Need It, Now They Don't. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 24, 131–150 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006657929803

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006657929803

Keywords

Navigation