Abstract
The Linnaean system of classification is a threefold system of theoretical assumptions, sorting rules, and rules of nomenclature. Over time, that system has lost its theoretical assumptions as well as its sorting rules. Cladistic revisions have left it less and less Linnaean. And what remains of the system is flawed on pragmatic grounds. Taking all of this into account, it is time to consider alternative systems of classification.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Atran, S.: 1990, Cognitive Foundations of Natural History: Towards an Anthropology of Science, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Brothers, D.: 1986, ‘Nomenclature at the Ordinal and Higher Levels’, Systematic Zoology 32, 34–42.
Cain, A.: 1958, ‘Logic and Memory in Linnaeus's System of Taxonomy’, Proceedings of the Linnaean Society of London 169, 144–163.
Darwin, C.: 1859 [1964], On the Origin of Species: A Facsimile of the First Edition, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
de Queiroz, K. and Gauthier, J.: 1992, ‘Phylogenetic Taxonomy’, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 23, 499–480.
de Queiroz, K. and Gauthier, J.: 1994, ‘Toward a Phylogenetic System of Biological Nomenclature’, Trends in Ecology and Evolution 9, 27–31.
Donoghue, M.: 1985, ‘A Critique of the Biological Species Concept and Recommendations for a Phylogenetic Alternative’, Bryologist 88, 172–181.
Eldredge, N. and Cracraft, J.: 1980, Phylogenetic Patterns and the Evolutionary Process, Columbia University Press, New York.
Ereshefsky, M.: 1991, ‘Species, Higher Taxa, and the Units of Evolution’, Philosophy of Science 58, 84–101.
Ereshefsky, M.: 1994, ‘Some Problems with the Linnaean Hierarchy’, Philosophy of Science 61, 186–205.
Gauthier, J. et al.: 1988, ‘A Phylogenetic Analysis of Lepidosauromorpha’, in R. Estes and G. Pregill (eds.), Phylogentic Relationships of Lizard Families, Stanford University Press, Palo Alto, California, pp. 15–98.
Graybeal, A.: 1995, ‘Naming Species’, Systematic Zoology 44, 237–250.
Griffiths, G.: 1973, ‘Some Fundamental Problems in Biological Classification’, Systematic Zoology 22, 338–343.
Griffiths, G.: 1974, ‘On the Foundations of Biological Systematics’, Acta Biotheoretica 3–4, 85–131.
Griffiths, G.: 1976, ‘The Future of Linnaean Nomenclature’, Systematic Zoology 25, 168–173.
Hennig, W.: 1965 [1994], ‘Phylogenetic Systematics’, Annual Review of Entomology 10, 97–116. Reprinted in E. Sober (ed.), Conceptual Issues in Evolutionary Biology, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 257–276.
Hennig, W.: 1966, Phylogenetic Systematics, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Hennig, W.: 1969 [1981], Insect Phylogeny. Translated by A. C. Pont, John Wiley Press, New York. Originally published as Die Stammesgeschichte der Insekten, Waldemar Kramer, Frankfurt.
Heywood, V.: 1985, ‘Linnaeus — the Conflict Between Science and Scholasticism’, in J. Weinstock (ed.), Contemporary Perspectives on Linnaeus. University Press of America, Lanham, Maryland, pp. 1–16.
Hull, D.: 1964 [1989], ‘Consistency and Monophyly’, Systematic Zoology 13, 1–11. Reprinted in D. Hull, The Metaphysics of Evolution, SUNY Press, New York, pp. 129–143.
Hull, D.: 1966, ‘Phylogenetic Numericlature’, Systematic Zoology 15, 14–17.
Hull, D.: 1978, ‘A Matter of Individuality’, Philosophy of Science 45, 335–360.
Hull, D.: 1985, ‘Linné as an Aristotelian’, in J. Weinstock (ed.), Contemporary Perspectives on Linnaeus. University Press of America, Lanham, Maryland, pp. 37–54.
Larson, J.: 1971, Reason and Experience: The Representation of Natural Order in the Work of Carl von Linné, University of California Press, Berkeley.
Linnaeus, C.: 1737 [1938], The Critica Botanica. Translated by A. Hort, The Ray Society, London.
Mayr, E.: 1969, Principles of Systematic Zoology, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Mayr, E.: 1970, Populations, Species, and Evolution, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Mayr, E.: 1982, The Growth of Biological Thought, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Michener, C.: 1963, ‘Some Future Developments in Taxonomy’, Systematic Zoology 12, 151–172.
Michener, C.: 1964, ‘The Possible Use of Uninominal Nomenclature to Increase the Stability of Names in Biology’, Systematic Zoology 13, 182–190.
Mishler, B. and Donoghue, M.: 1982, ‘Species Concepts: A Case for Pluralism’, Systematic Zoology 31, 491–503.
Nelson, G.: 1972, ‘Phylogenetic Relationship and Classification’, Systematic Zoology 21, 227–231.
Patterson, C. and Rosen, D.: 1977, ‘Review of Ichthyodectiform and other Mesozoic Teleost Fishes and the Theory and Practice of Classifying Fossils’, Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 158, 81–172.
Pennisi, E.: 1996, ‘Meeting Briefs: Evolutionary and Systematic Biologists Converge’, Science 273, 181–182.
Rosen, D.: 1979, ‘Vicariant Patterns Historical Explanation in Biogeography’, Systematic Zoology 27, 159–188.
Simpson, G.: 1961, The Principles of Animal Taxonomy, Columbia University Press, New York.
Simpson, G.: 1963, ‘The Meaning of Taxonomic Statements’, in S. Washburn (ed.), Classification and Human Evolution, Aldine Press, New York, pp. 1–31.
Wiley, E.: 1979, ‘The Annotated Linnaean hierarchy, with comments on Natural Taxa and Competing Systems’, Systematic Zoology 28, 308–337.
Wiley, E.: 1981, Phylogenetics: The Theory and Practice of Phylogenetic Systematics, Wiley and Sons, New York.
Winsor, M.: 1985, ‘The Impact of Darwinism upon the Linnaean Enterprise, with special Reference to the Work of T. H. Huxley’, in J. Weinstock (ed.), Contemporary Perspectives on Linnaeus. University Press of America, Lanham, Maryland, pp. 55–84.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ereshefsky, M. The Evolution of the Linnaean Hierarchy. Biology & Philosophy 12, 493–519 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006556627052
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006556627052