Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Loblolly -- the pine for the twenty-first century

  • Published:
New Forests Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) was a minor component of the vast natural forests of the southern United States before the region was settled by immigrants. Extensive planting and natural regeneration of cutover forest land and abandoned farmland between 1930 and 1990 made loblolly the leading timber species in the United States. It now predominates on 13.4 million ha (45 percent) of the commercial forest land in the southern United States (between latitudes 28° N and 39° N and longitudes 75° W and 97° W) and directly or indirectly provides 110,000 jobs and $30 billion to the economy of the region. The extreme versatility of loblolly has also provided important environmental contributions to most southern states. These include landscape beautification, erosion control, soil amelioration, excellent wildlife habitat, and outstanding recreational opportunities. Incorporating existing pest management strategies into silvicultural systems can produce substantial and long-lasting insect and disease control with little cost or physical effort. Introductions of loblolly into numerous countries around the world (especially China, Brazil, and Argentina) have proven to be very successful, environmentally sound, and commercially profitable. In some locations, loblolly grows much faster than on sites of similar quality in the southern United States.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbott, H.G. and Fitch, S.D. 1977. Forest nursery practices in the United States. J. For. 75: 141–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alig, R.J., Knight, H.A. and Birdsey, R.A. 1986. Recent Area Changes in Southern Forest Ownerships and Cover Types. Research Paper SE-260. Southeastern Forest Experiment Station, USDA Forest Service, Asheville, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balmer, W.E., Utz, K.A. and Langdon, O.G. 1978. Financial returns from cultural work in natural loblolly pine stands. South. J. Appl. For. 2(4): 111–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, C.R. and Marx, D.H. 1976. Sewage sludge and Pisolithus tinctorius ectomycorrhizae: Their effect on growth of pine seedlings. For. Sci. 22(3): 351–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birdsey, R.A. and Pitcher, J.A. 1986. Management options for poorly stocked stands in the south central United States. South. J. Appl. For. 10(2): 73–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton, J.D. and Tiarks, A.E. 1986. Available nutrients and early growth of woody plants vary with overburden material in lignite minesoils of Louisiana, pp. 79–85. In: Proceedings of the National Meeting of the American Society of Surface Mining and Reclamation. American Society for Surface Mining and Reclamation, Princeton, WV.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busby, R.L. 1989. Economic returns using sulfometuron methyl (Oust) for herbaceous weed control in southern pine plantations, pp. 359–364. In: Proceedings, 5th Biennial Southern Silvicultural Research Conference, 1988. Memphis, TN. Gen. Tech Rep. SO-74. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Forest Experiment Station, New Orleans, LA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, B.B. 1982. Taxpayers gain from southern pine regeneration programs. South. J. Appl. For. 6(4): 188–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, E.C. 1985. How to manage your woodlands profitably. For. Farm. 44(5): 14–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilmore, A.R. and Funk, D.T. 1976. Shortleaf and loblolly pine seed origin trails in southern Illinois: 27–year results, pp. 115–124. In: Proceedings of the 10th Central States Forest Tree Improvement Conference. Department of Forestry and Natural Resources, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goebel, N.B. 1974. Growth and yield of planted loblolly pine. In: Proceedings, Symposium on Management of Young Pines 1974 October 22–24; Alexandria, LA/December 3–5, Charleston, SC, Asheville, NC; USDA Forest Service, Southeastern Forest Experiment Station 264–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Han, Y.C., Hong, S.H., Sohn, S.I., Ahn, J.K. and Byoun, K.O. 1987a. Studies on late growth performance of Pinus rigida χ Pinus taeda. Res. Rep. Inst. For. Genet., Korea Republic 23: 11–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Han, Y.C., Lee, K.Y., Choi, S.K., Ryu, K.O., Chang, S.O., Song, H.U., Noh, C.C., Chang, S.K., Kim, K.S. and Youn, K.S. 1987b. Growth performance of 24–year-old loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) in five locations. Rep. Inst. For. Genet., Korea Republic 23: 96–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull IV, B.R. and Buhyoff, G.J. 1986. The scenic beauty temporal distribution method: An attempt to make scenic beauty assessments compatible with forest planning efforts. For. Sci. 32(2): 271–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyun, S.K. 1972. The possibility of F utilization in pine hybridization, pp. 1–10. In: Proceedings of the IUFRO genetics-SABRAO Joint Symposia. Government Forest Experiment Station, Tokyo, Japan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyun, S.K. 1974. Pine hybridization and performance of hybrids in Korea. Indian J. Genet. 34A: 375–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyun, S.K. and Ahn, K.Y. 1959. Principal characteristics of χ Pinus rigitaeda. Res. Rep. Inst. For. Genet., Korea Republic 1: 35–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kline, W.N. and Kidd, F.A. 1986. Economics of brush control in loblolly pine plantations, pp. 324–334. In: Weed Science and Risk Assessment: Proceedings, Southern Weed Science Society 39th Annual Meeting. Southern Weed Science Society, Champaign, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lantz, C.W. 1988. Overview of southern regeneration, pp. 1–7. In: Proceedings of the 1988 Southern Forest Nursery Association. Southern Forest Nursery Association, Charleston, SC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maki, T.E. 1964. From poverty grass to pine timber. Res. Farm. 23(1): 4–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maki, T.E. and Allen II, L.H. 1978. Turbulence characteristics of a single line pine tree windbreak, pp. 81–92. In: Proceedings of the 37th AnnualMeeting of the Soil and Crop Science Society of Florida. Soil and Crop Science Society of Florida, Gainesville, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, W.R., Jr. 1969. Techniques and progress in regenerating southern pines. For. Prod. J. 19(8): 10–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeel, J.F. and Stuart, W.B. 1984. Feasibility of Agri-Silviculture for Pine Plantations in the South. Paper 84–1609. American Society of Agricultural Engineers, St. Joseph, MI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, R.D., Klemperer, W.D. and Siegel, W.C. 1986. Cutting contracts and timberland leasing. J. For. 84(12): 35–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosson, J.F., Jr. and Doolittle, L. 1987. Profiles of Mid-South Nonindustrial Private Forests and Owners. Resource Bulletin SO-125. Southern Forest Experiment Station, USDA Forest Service, New Orleans, LA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudis, V.A., Rosson, J.F. and Kelly, J.F. 1984. Forest Resources of Alabama. Resource Bulleton SO-98. Southern Forest Experiment Station, USDA Forest Service, New Orleans, LA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreiner, H.G. and Baggio, A.J. 1984. Intercropping of corn (Zea mays L.) with Pinus taeda L. planted stands located in Southern Parana, Brazil. Boletin de Pesquisa Florestal, Curitiba 8/9: 26–49.

  • Schultz, R.P. 1975. Intensive culture of southern pines: maximum yields on short rotations. Iowa State J. Res. 49(3): 325–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheffield, R.W., Cost, N.E., Bechtold, W.A. and McClure, J.P. 1985. Pine Growth Reductions in the Southwest. Resource Bulletin SE-83. Southeastern Forest Experiment Station, USDA Forest Service, Asheville, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D.W. 1989. Industry-sponsored landowner assistance programs. For. Farm. 48(5): 41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Telewski, F.W. 1986. Physiological responses of trees to mechanical perturbation: Implication for genetic evaluation for wind tolerance, pp. 251–252. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Windbreak Technology. Great Plains Agricultural Council Publication 117. Cooperative Extension Service, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wahlenberg, W.G. 1960. Loblolly Pine: Its use, Ecology, Regeneration, Protection, Growth and Management. School of Forestry, Duke University, Durham, NC. 603 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, T.M. and Gresham, C.A. 1986. Factors important to loblolly pine productivity on the southeastern Coastal Plain of the United States, pp. 177–186. In: Agren, G.I. (Ed) Predicting Consequences of Intensive Forest Harvesting on Long-Term Productivity. Report 26. Institutiionen for Ekologi ochMiljovard, Sveriges Lantbruksuniversitet, Uppsala, Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williston, H.L. 1988. The Yazoo-Little Tallahatchie Flood Prevention Project: A history of the Forest Service's role. Forestry Report R8–FR 8. Southern Region, USDA Forest Service, Atlanta, GA. 63 p.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Southern Forest Experiment Station, USDA Forest Service, USA

    Robert P. Schultz

Authors
  1. Robert P. Schultz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schultz, R.P. Loblolly -- the pine for the twenty-first century. New Forests 17, 71–88 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006533212151

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006533212151

Search

Navigation