Skip to main content
Log in

White and nonwhite trends in first birth timing: Comparisons using vital registration and current population surveys

Population Research and Policy Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The magnitude of racial differences in first birth timing vary greatly depending upon the data sources from which they are estimated. Vital registration data (Heuser 1976; with updates from the National Center for Health Statistics 1974–1990) show that in recent years nonwhites have higher risks of a first birth at virtually all ages compared to whites. As a result very large and historically novel differentials in childlessness are forecast using these data (see Rindfuss et al. 1988; Chen & Morgan 1991; Morgan & Chen 1992). However, retrospective fertility history data collected from the 1980, 1985 and 1990 Current Population Surveys (CPS) suggest much smaller racial differences in completed childlessness and isolate racial differences in probabilities of first births at young ages. Differences also exist between theses two series for whites prior to the mid-1960s but not afterwards. Reasons for these differing estimates are suggested and examined. We conclude that a substantial portion of the differences result from an accumulation of biases in the vital registration estimates that affect primarily estimates of first birth timing. Thus, the CPS data provide a more firm basis for racial comparisons of first birth timing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahlburg, D. A. (1993). The Census Bureau's new projections of the US population, Population and Development Review 19: 159–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, D. E. (1982). What's happening to the age at first birth in the United States? A study of recent cohorts, Demography 19: 351–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, R. & Morgan, S. Ph. (1991). Recent trends in the timing of first births in the United States, Demography 28: 513–533.

    Google Scholar 

  • El-Badry, M. A. (1961). Failure of enumerators to make entries of zero in recording childless cases in population censuses, Journal of the American Statistical Association 56: 909–924.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, M. D. R. (1986). American fertility patterns: A comparison of white and nonwhite cohorts born 1903–1956, Population and Development Review 12: 267–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heuser, R. (1976). Fertility Tables for Birth Cohorts by Color: United States, 1917–1973. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Himes, Ch. L. & Clogg, C. C. (1992). An overview of demographic analysis as a method for evaluating census coverage in the United States, Population Index 58(4): 587–607.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, S. Ph. & Chen, R. (1992). Predicting childlessness for recent cohorts of American women, International Journal of Forecasting 8: 477–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • NCHS, National Center for Health Statistics (1974–1993). Vital Statistics of the United States (selected years). Volume 1: Natality. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • NCHS, National Center for Health Statistics (1995). Vital Statistics of the United States: 1992. Volume 1: Natality. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Connell, M. & Miller, L. (1993). Whose vital events are they? The effect of immigration on the estimation of fertility and marital history data from retrospective surveys. Working Paper.

  • Rindfuss, R. R., Morgan, S. Ph. & Swicegood, G. (1988). First Births in America: Changes in the Timing of Parenthood. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J. G. & Gist, Y. J. (1992). Effect of alternative race classification rules on the annual number of births by race: 1968–1989. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Population Association of America in Denver, Colorado, 30 April–2 May.

  • Schoendorf, K. C. et al. (1993). Comparability of the birth certificate and 1988 Maternal and Infant Health Survey. National Center for Health Statistics, Vital Health Stat. 2(116).

  • Swicegood, C. G., Morgan, S. Ph. & Rindfuss, R. R. (1984). Measurement and replication: Evaluating consistency of eight U.S. fertility surveys, Demography 21: 19–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Bureau of the Census (1992). Population Projections of the United States, by Age, Sex, Race and Hispanic Origin: 1992 to 2050. Current Population Reports, P25-1092. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Morgan, S.P., Botev, N., Chen, R. et al. White and nonwhite trends in first birth timing: Comparisons using vital registration and current population surveys. Population Research and Policy Review 18, 339–356 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006245612218

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006245612218

Navigation