Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

IFG, a gypsy-like retrotransposon in Pinus (Pinaceae), has an extensive history in pines

  • Published:
Plant Molecular Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A 1 kb EcoRI restriction fragment cloned from a band visible in an agarose gel of Pinus lambertiana (sugar pine) genomic DNA is present in both subgenera of Pinus with at least 104 copies/genome. A full-length copy of this repeated element recovered from a P. radiata (Monterey pine) genomic DNA library was found to possess all of the sequence features associated with gypsy-like retrotransposons. This report describes the biology and history of the IFG (Institute of Forest Genetics) family of retrotransposons. The characterized IFG7 is 5937 bp long. Immediately interior to its 5′ and 3′ long terminal repeats are sequences consistent with primer binding sites for reverse transcription of the RNA genome. Presumptive gene products associated with retrotransposition appear to be coded in a single reading frame and are in the same order as the gypsy-like retrotransposons and retroviruses. The 1.0 kb EcoRI fragment of IFG elements codes for the 3′ half of IFG's reverse transcriptase and the entire RNase H domain. Southern blot analysis suggests IFG was present in Pinaceae before its division into its modern genera. Sequence analysis of IFG 1.0 kb RI fragments and southern analysis also suggest that IFG continued to evolve in Pinus with restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) subfamilies appearing early in the history of each subgenus often correlating with subdivisions of Pinus. Features shared with other plant retrotransposons are also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Axelrod DI: Cenozoic history of some western American pines. Ann Miss Bot Gard 73: 565–641(1986).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Berg JM: Potential metal-binding domains in nucleic acid binding proteins. Science232: 485–487(1986).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bingham PM, Zachar Z: Retrotransposons and the FB Trans-poson from Drosophila melanogaster. In: Berg DE, Howe MM (eds) Mobile DNA, pp. 450–503, American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C. (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Boeke JD: Transposable elements in Saccharomyces cere-visiae In: Berg DE, Howe MM (eds) Mobile DNA, pp. 335–374, American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C. (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Camirand A and Brisson N: The complete nucleotide sequence of the Tst1 retrotransposon of potato. Nucl Acids Res 18: 4929 (1990).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chiu LM, Callahan R, Tronick SR, Schlom J, Aaronson S.A: Major pol gene progenitors in the evolution of oncoviruses. Science 223: 364–370(1984).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Donehower L, Gillespie D: Restriction site periodicities in highly repetitive DNA of primates. J Mol Biol 134: 805–834 (1979).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Doolittle RF, Feng DF, Johnson MJ, McClure MA: Origins and evolutionary relationships of retroviruses. Q Rev Biol 64: 1–30(1989).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Feinberg AO, Vogelstein B: A technique for radiolabeling DNA restriction endonuclease fragments to high specific ac-tivity. Anal Biochem 132: 6–13(1983).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Friesen PD, Nissen MS: Gene organization and transcription of TED, a Lepidopteran retrotransposon integrated within the baculovirus genome. Mol Cell Biol 10: 3067–3077(1990).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Grandbastien M, Spielmann A, Caboche M: Tnt1, a mobile retroviral-like transposable element of tobacco isolated by plant cell genetics. Nature 337: 376–380(1989).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hansen LJ, Chalker DL, Sandmeyer SB: Ty3, a yeast retro-transposon associated with tRNA genes, has homology to animal retroviruses. Mol Cell Biol 8: 5245–5256(1988).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Henikoff S: Unidirectional digestion with exonuclease III creates targeted breakpoints for DNA sequencing. Gene 28: 351–359(1984).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Jin YK, Bennetzen JL: Structure and coding properties of Bs1, a maize retrovirus-like transposon. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86: 6235–6239(1989).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Johnson MS, McClure MA, Feng DF, Gray J, Doolittle RF: Computer analysis of retrovirus pol genes: assignment of en-zymatic function to specific sequences and homologies with nonviral enzymes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83: 7648–7652 (1986).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kamm A, Doudrick RL, Heslop-Harrison JS, Schmidt T: The genomic and physical organization of Ty1-copia-like se-quences as a component of large genomes in Pinus elliottii var. elliottii and other gymnosperms. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93: 2708–2713(1996).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kriebel HB DNA sequence components of the Pinus strobus nuclear genome. Can J For Res 15: 1–4(1985).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Langley CH., Montgomery E, Hudson R, Kaplan N, Charlesworth B: On the role of unequal exchange in the con-tainment of transposable element copy number. Genet Res 52: 223–235(1988).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Li WH., Wu CI, Luo CC: A new method for estimating syn-onymous and nonsynonymous rates of nucleotide substitution considering the relative likelihood of nucleotide and codon changes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2: 150–174(1985).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lindauer A, Fraser D, Brüderlein M, Schmitt R: Reverse tran-scriptase families and a copia-like retrotransposon, Osser, in the green alga Volvox carteri. FEBS J 319: 261–266(1993).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Little EL, Critchfield WB: Subdivisions of the Genus Pi-nus (pines). U.S. Department of Agriculture Miscellaneous Publications 1144 (1969).

  22. Maniatis T, Fritsch EF, Sambrook J: Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Marlor RL, Parkhurst SM, Corces VG: The Drosophila melanogaster gypsy transposable element encodes putative gene products homologous to retroviral proteins. Mol Cell Biol 6: 1129–1134(1986).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. McAllister BF, Werren JH: Phylogenetic analysis of a retro-transposon with implications for strong evolutionary con-straints on reverse transcriptase. Mol Biol Evol 14: 69–80 (1997).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Mirov NT: The Genus Pinus. Ronald, New York (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Mount S, Rubin G: Complete nucleotide sequence of the Drosophila transposable element copia: homology between copia and retroviral proteins. Mol Cell Biol5: 1630–1638 (1985).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Patarca R, Haseltine WA: Sequence similarity among retro-viruses. Nature 309: 728 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Pearl LH, Taylor WR: A structural model for the retroviral proteases. Nature 329: 351- 354 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Prats AC, Sarih L, Gabus C, Litvak S, Keith G, Darlix JL: Small finger protein of avian and murine retroviruses has nucleic acid annealing activity and positions the replication primer tRNA onto genomic RNA. EMBO J 7: 1777–1783 (1988).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Price RA, Olsen-Stojkovich J, Lowenstein JM: Relationships among the genera of Pinaceae: an immunological comparison. Syst Bot 12: 91–97(1987).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Roeder GS, Fink GR: Transposable elements in yeast. In: Shapiro J (ed) Mobile Genetic Elements, pp. 299–326. Aca-demic Press, New York (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Rogers SO, Bendich AJ: Extraction of DNA from milligram amounts of fresh, herbarium and mummified plant tissues. Plant Mol Biol 5: 69–76(1985).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Sederoff, R., Stomp A-M, Gwynn G, Ford E, Loopstra C, Hodgskiss P, Chilton WS: Application of recombinant DNA techniques to pines: A molecular approach to genetic engi-neering in forestry. In: Bonga JM, Durzan DJ (eds) Cell and Tissue Culture in Forestry, pp. 314–329. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Shinnick T, Lerner R, Sutcliffe J. Nucleotide sequence of Moloney murine leukemia virus. Nature 293: 543–548(1981).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Smyth DR, Kalitsis P, Joseph JL, Sentry JW: Plant retrotrans-poson from Lilium henryi is related to Ty3 of yeast and the gypsy group of Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 86: 5015–5019(1989).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Sprinzl M, Hartman T, Weber J, Blank J, Zeidler R: Compila-tion of tRNA sequences and sequences of tRNA genes. Nucl Acids Res 17 (Suppl) 1–72(1989).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Strauss SH, Doerksen AH: Restriction fragment analysis of pine phylogeny. Evolution 44: 1081–1096(1990).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Su PY, Brown TA: Ty3/gypsy-like retrotransposon sequences in tomato. Plasmid 38: 148–157(1997).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Swofford DL: PAUP: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony, Version 3.0L (Mac). Illinois Natural History Survey, Cham-paign, IL (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Van der Burgh J: Woods of the Rhenish brown-coal formation, 2. Woods, from the brown-coal pits 'Maria Theresia' at Herzo-genrath, 'Zukunft West' at Eschweiler and 'Victor' ( Zülpich Mitte) at Zülpich. With a systematic-anatomical study of the genus Pinus L. Rev Paleobot Palynol 15: 73–275(1973).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Varmus H, Brown P: Retroviruses. In: Berg DE, Howe MM (eds) Mobile DNA, pp. 53–108. American Society for Micro-biology, Washington, D.C. (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Voytas DF, Ausubel FM: A copia-like transposable element family in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature 336: 242–244(1988).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Voytas DF, Cummings MP, Konieczny A, Ausubel FM, Ro-dermel SR: Copia-like retrotransposons are ubiquitous among plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89: 7124–7128(1992).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Voytas DF, Konieczny A, Commings MP, Ausubel FM: The structure, distribution and evolution of the Ta1 retrotranspos-able element family of Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetics 126: 713–721(1990).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Wakainiya I, Newton RJ, Johnston JS, Price, HJ: Genome size and environmental factors in the genus Pinus. Am J Bot 80:1235–1241(1993).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Wolfe KH, Sharp PM, Li W-H: Rates of synonymous sub-stitution in plant nuclear genes. J Mol Evol 29: 208- 211 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Xiong Y, Eickbush T: Origin and evolution of retroelements based upon their reverse transcriptase sequence. EMBO 9: 3353–3362(1990).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Yuki S, Ishimaru S, Inouye S, Saigo K: Identification of genes for reverse transcriptase-like enzymes in two Drosophila retrotransposons 412 and gypsy; a rapid detection method of reverse transcriptase genes using YXDD box probes. Nucl Acids Res. 14: 3017–3030(1986b).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Zararin E: Taxonomy of pinyons based on terpenoids from wood oleoresin and on morphological and other biological characters. In: Proceedings Second International Pinyon Pine Symposium (August 6- 8, 1987), Lomas de Chapultepec, Mexico, D.F. (1989).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Genetics, University of California, Davis, CA , 95616, USA

    David S. Kossack

  2. Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station U.S. Forest Service, Institute of Forest Genetics, 1960 Addison Street, Berkeley, CA , 94704, USA

    Claire S. Kinlaw

Authors
  1. David S. Kossack
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Claire S. Kinlaw
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kossack, D.S., Kinlaw, C.S. IFG, a gypsy-like retrotransposon in Pinus (Pinaceae), has an extensive history in pines. Plant Mol Biol 39, 417–426 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006115732620

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006115732620

Search

Navigation