Skip to main content
Log in

Differences between Dianthus caryophyllus L. cultivar in in vitro growth and morphogenesis are related to their ethylene production

  • Published:
Plant Growth Regulation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The involvement of ethylene in the vitro development of shoots from nodal segments of two cultivars of carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus L.) was studied. Shoots of cv. Barbaret Antares showed low hyperhydricity in contrast with the high levels showed by cv. Barbaret Tanga when both were cultured in airtight culture vessels. Longer shoots were produced, in both cases, when the rate of gas exchange in the culture vessel was increased by using vented closures, which also prevented hyperhydricity and increased the multiplication coefficient in cultures of Barbaret Tanga.

The two cultivars produced ethylene throughout the culture period but, a higher amount was produced during the first, second and fourth weeks in culture by the cultivar more sensitive to ventilation (Barbaret Tanga). Trapping ethylene did not produce any effect on cv. Barbaret Antares but improved the quality of cv. Barbaret Tanga explants, decreasing hyperhydricity and increasing the number of shoots, the length of the main shoot and the multiplication coefficient. These effects were more marked when ethylene was trapped during the first two weeks in culture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abeles FB, Morgan PW and Saltveit ME Jr. (1992) Ethylene in Plant Biology (2nd edn). New York: Academic Press Inc

    Google Scholar 

  2. De Proft MP, Maene LJ and Debergh PC (1985) Carbon dioxide and ethylene evolution in the culture atmosphere of Magnolia cultured in vitro. Physiol Plant 65: 375–379

    Google Scholar 

  3. Debergh PC, Aitken-Christie J, Cohen D, Grout B, Von Arnold S, Zimmerman R and Ziv M (1992) Reconsideration of the term “vitrification” as used in micropropagation. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 30: 135–140

    Google Scholar 

  4. Demeester JJ, Matthijs DG, Pascat B and Debergh PC (1995) Toward a controllable headspace composition. Growth, development, and headspace of a micropropagated Prunus rootstock in different containers. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol 31P: 105–112

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dillen W and Buysens S (1989) A simple technique to overcome vitrification in Gypsophila paniculata L. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 19: 181–188

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dimasi-Theriou K, Economou AE and Sfakiotakis EM (1993) Promotion of petunia (Petunia hybrida L.) regeneration in vitro by ethylene. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 32: 219–225

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dolev E (1986) Hardening of tissue cultured fern and carnation plantlets. MSc Thesis. Israel: The Hebrew University of Jerusalem

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fujiwara K and Kozai T (1995) Physical microenvironment and its effects. In: Aitken-Christie J, Kozai T and Smith ML (eds) Automation and Environmental Control in Plant Tissue Culture, pp 319–336. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher

    Google Scholar 

  9. González A, Arigita L, Majada JP and Sánchez Tamés R (1997) In vitro organogenesis and plant growth of Populus tremula in relation to ethylene. Plant Growth Regul 22: 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kevers C and Gaspar T (1985) Vitrification of carnation in vitro: Changes in ethylene production, ACC level and capacity to convert ACC to ethylene. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 4: 215–223

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kumar PP, Reid DM and Thorpe TA (1987) The role of ethylene and carbon dioxide in differentiation on shoot buds in excised cotyledons of Pinus radiata in vitro. Physiol Plant 69: 244–252

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lambardi M, Benelli C and Fabbri A (1997) In vitro axillary shoot proliferation of apple rootstocks under different ethylene conditions. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol 33P: 70–74

    Google Scholar 

  13. Majada JP, Fal MA and Sánchez-Tamés R (1997) The effect of ventilation rate on proliferation and hyperhydricity of Dianthus caryophyllus L. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol 33P: 62–69

    Google Scholar 

  14. McClelland MT and Smith MAL (1990) Vessel type, closure, and explant orientation influence in vitro performance of five woody species. HortScience 25: 797–800

    Google Scholar 

  15. Melé E, Messeguer J and Camprubi P (1982) Effects of ethylene on carnation explants grown in sealed vessels. In: A Fujiwara (ed) Plant Tissue Culture 1982. Proc. IAPTC, pp 69–70. Tokyo

  16. Monette PL (1983) Influence of size of culture vessel on in vitro proliferation of grape in a liquid medium. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 2: 327–332

    Google Scholar 

  17. Murashige T and Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue culture. Physiol Plant 15: 473–497

    Google Scholar 

  18. Righetti B and Facini O (1992) Headspace gas composition in four Prunus avium cultivars with differing photosynthetic capabilities. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol 28P: 179–182

    Google Scholar 

  19. Righetti B, Magnanini E, Infante R and Predieri S (1990) Ethylene, ethanol, acetaldehyde and carbon dioxide released by Prunus avium shoot cultures. Physiol Plant 78: 507–510

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rossetto M, Dixon KW and Bunn E (1992) Aeration: A simple method to control vitrification and improve in vitro culture of rare australian plants. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol 28P: 192–196

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sisler EC and Wood C (1988) Interaction of ethylene and CO2. Physiol Plant 73: 440–444

    Google Scholar 

  22. Smith MAL and Spomer LA (1995) Vessels, gels, liquid media, and support systems. In: Aitken-Christie J, Kozai T and Smith ML (eds) Automation and Environmental Control in Plant Tissue Culture, pp 371–404. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ward TM, Wright M, Roberts JA, Self R and Osborne DJ (1978) Analytical procedures for the assay and identification of ethylene. In: Hillman JR (ed) Isolation of Plant Growth Substances, pp 135–151. London: Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ziv M (1991) Vitrification: morphological and physiological disorders of in vitro plants. In: Debergh PC and Zimmerman RH (eds) Micropropagation, pp 45–70. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fal, M., Majada, J., González, A. et al. Differences between Dianthus caryophyllus L. cultivar in in vitro growth and morphogenesis are related to their ethylene production. Plant Growth Regulation 27, 131–136 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006107230678

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006107230678

Navigation