Skip to main content
Log in

A GIS-based planning approach to locating urban rail terminals

  • Published:
Transportation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper develops a flexible GIS-based methodology for evaluating the potential locations of terminal park-and-ride facilities along urban rail lines. The methodology differs from political-based approaches and traditional travel demand modeling in its use of an objective measure of accessibility to gage the suitability of a site. The methodology begins by constructing an index of derived demand for rail usage based on the local demographics. Principal component analysis (PCA) is used as a means of constructing an index of derived demand consistent with other passenger surveys. Next, trade areas or commutersheds are calculated for each candidate park-and-ride location based on realistic measures of accessibility and network based drive times, taking into account competition among candidates for riders. Following the analysis, the candidate locations and their commutersheds are delineated and visualized in the GIS environment. In summary, application of this method produces a site-specific suitability index that may be used to rank and compare potential park-and-ride locations. We illustrate how our approach fits within the context of the larger-scale corridor study as a complimentary means of refining the location of urban rail stations. The analysis uses the proposed rail system for Columbus Ohio as a case study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Public Transit Association (1996) 1996 Transit Fixed Guideway Inventory. Washington, DC: APTA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrington G (1995) Beyond the field of dreams: Light rail and growth management in Portland. In: The Seventh National Conference on Light Rail Transit. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolger D, Colquhoun D, & Morrall J (1992). Planning and design of park-and-ride facilities for the Calgary light rail transit system. In: Transportation Research Record1361, TRB, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox M (1982) Bus park and ride: Design guidelines. In: Design Construction and Rehabilitation of Public Transport Facilities. Conference Proceedings, American Society of Civil Engineers.

  • Dickens I (1991) Park and ride facilities on light rail transit systems. Transportation18, 23-36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunphy R (1995) Review of recent American light rail experiences. The Seventh National Conference on Light Rail Transit. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Transit Administration (2000) Annual Report on New Starts: Proposed Allocation of Funds for Fiscal Year 2001. Washington, DC: US Department of Transportation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray BH (1989) Urban Public Transportation Glossary. Washington, DC: TRB, National Research Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kantor (1996) The new world class, how local goes global. World Link Magazine(Sept/Oct 1995).

  • Keck C & Lou P (1976) Forecasting demand for peripheral park and ride service. In: Transportation Research Record 563, TRB, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kok E, Morrall J, & Toth Z (1994) Trip generation rates for light rail transit park-and-ride lots. ITE Journal-Institute of Transportation Engineers, 34-41.

  • LaBelle S & Stuart D (1995) Diverting automobile users from transit: Early lessons from Chicago Transit Authority's Orange Line. In: Transportation Research Record 1503, TRB, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lutin J & Benz G (1992). Key issues in light rail transit and station design. In: Transportation Research Record 1361, TRB, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macpherson R (1996) Park and ride - progress and problems. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Municipal Engineer, 1-8.

  • Morrall J (1987) Transportation Planning Guidelines for Light Rail Transit Park-and-Ride Facilities. Transportation Department, City of Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrall J & Bolger D (1996) Park and Ride: Canada's Most Cost Effective TDM Strategy. Paper presented at the 1996 Annual Conference of the Transportation Association of Canada, Charlottetown, PEI.

  • Porter P (1999, January 10) COTA: Rail system is key to future. Columbus Dispatch, 1A, 2A.

  • Roberts A, Parker A, Surl R, & Gallop K (1996) Park and Ride: New Case Studies. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Transport.

  • Sacramento Regional Transit (1987) Design Guidelines for Bus and Light Rail Facilities. Sacramento TDA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumann J & Tidrick S (1995) Status of North American Light Rail Transit Systems: 1995 Update. In: The Seventh National Conference on Light Rail Transit. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • City of Stuttgart (1987) P&R Development Programme. Stuttgart, FRG: VVS, Stuttgart, Parker and Gallop.

  • Taaffe E, Gauthier H, & O'Kelly M (1996) Geography of Transportation. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • TriMet (1997) TriMet Attitude and Awareness Study, November 1997, URL: http://www.tri-met.org.

  • Williams Brian (2000, June 22) COTA to launch a new rail study. Columbus Dispatch, C6.

  • Winston C & Shirley C (1998) Alternate route: toward efficient urban transportation. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wulkan A & Henry L (1985) Evaluation of Light Rail Transit for Austin, Texas. In: Light Rail Transit: System Design for Cost-Effectiveness. Washington, DC: TRB, National Research Council.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark W. Horner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Horner, M.W., Grubesic, T.H. A GIS-based planning approach to locating urban rail terminals. Transportation 28, 55–77 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005204010958

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005204010958

Navigation