Abstract
This article views the therapeutic use of self broadly as if through a wide-angle lens focusing on the therapist within his or her surroundings. These contextual features can be seen as projections of the therapist's self and therefore useable in treatment. Through an interest in alternative brain functions due to her own struggles with a neurological illness, the author arrived at the idea of utilizing her personal interests which naturally come into the milieu as therapeutic vehicles. Personal interests that are compatible with the patient's character offer alternative modes for experiencing, expressing and regulating affect states. These interests in the expressive arts together with the person of the therapist constitute a medium for rotating attention around unfamiliar parts of the mental landscape. Disavowed or dissociated affects can be unearthed, made conscious, put into language, and treated. This idea in practice nests neatly within recent thinking in psychoanalysis, neuroscience, and the philosophy of science. When language alone is not enough to move the therapeutic process forward, other working knowledge in the therapist's life can be brought to bear as a powerful evocative force for therapeutic change.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Barrow, J.D. (1995). The artful universe. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
Bollas, C. (1992). Being a Character. New York: Hill and Wang.
Capra, F. (1996). The Web of Life. New York: Anchor.
Damasio, A. (1994). Descartes Error. New York: Putnam.
Darwin, C. (1872). The expression of emotions inman and animals.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Edwards, B. (1989). Drawing on the right side of the brain. New York: Putnam.
Erikson, Erik E. (1972). Play and acturality. In M.W. Piers (Ed.). Play and development (pp. 127-169). New York: Norton.
Freud, S. (1905). Jokes and relation to the unconscious. New York: Norton.
Freud, S. (1914). The Moses of Michelangelo. In Collected papers vol. 4 (pp. 257-287). New York: Basic Books.
Freud, S. (1928). Dostoevsky and parricide. In Collected papers vol. 5 (pp. 222-243). New York: Basic Books.
Gallway, T. (1976). Inner tennis. New York: Random House.
Gardner, H. (1985). Frames of mind. New York: Basic Books.
Gardner, H. (1994). The arts and human development. New York: Basic Books.
Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Gopnik, Adam. (1998). Man goes to see doctor. In The New Yorker, Aug. 24, 1998, pp. 84-121.
Hamer, D. & Copeland P. (1998). Living with our genes. New York: Doubleday.
Jacobsen, K.D. (1995). Drawing households and other living spaces in the process of assessment and psychotherapy. Clinical Social Work Journal. 25(3), 305-327.
Klugman, D. (1997). Existentialism and Constructivism: A Bi-Polar Model of Subjectivity. Clinical Social Work Journal. 25 (3) 297-315.
Kohut, H. (1984). How does analysis cure? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Rothenberg, A. (1990). Creativity and Madness. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Solas, J. (1995). Deconstruction and Clinical Social Work. Clinical Socil Work Journal. 23(2), 151-159.
Stern, D. (1985). The interpersonal world of the human infant. New York: Basic Books.
Tomkins, Silvan S. (1962). Affect Imagery Consciousnes, vol. 1. New York: Springer Publishing.
Winnicott, D.W. (1953). Transitional objects and transitional phenomena. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, vol. 34, part 2.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Elliott, C.M. Tuning and Practicing the Therapeutic Instrument: The Therapist's Life Experience. Clinical Social Work Journal 28, 321–330 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005187818997
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005187818997