Skip to main content
Log in

A comparison of sensitization kinetics in 304 and 316 stainless steels

  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effects of tensile and cold rolling strain (up to 40%) over a range of grain sizes ranging from 300 μm to 10 μm on sensitization (and desensitization) were observed and compared for 304 and 316 stainless steel having a constant carbon content of 0.05%; at 670°C. Rapid sensitization-desensitization was observed for both materials at the smallest grain size, and plots of degree of sensitization (DOS) data with time, temperature, and tensile strain coupled with chromium diffusivity data for 304 stainless steel allowed activation energies to be calculated from corresponding Arrhenius plots utilizing supplemental data from Beltran, et al. [1] at 625°C and 775°C. Values of 1.9 and 2 kcal/mol were found for unstrained and 20% strained samples for 11 μm grain size while corresponding values at 175 μm grain size were 55 and 32 kcal/mol respectively. Activation energies for unstrained and 10% strained 316 stainless steel for 135 μm grain size were found to be 76 and 64 kcal/mol, respectively. Sensitization was more rapid for cold-rolling versus tensile straining in both stainless steels, and there was no detectable sensitization for the largest grain size regime of the 316 stainless steel up to 10 h aging time at 670°C.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R. Beltran, J. G. Maldonado, L. E. Murr and W. W. W. Fisher, Acta Mater. 45(10) (1997) 4351.

    Google Scholar 

  2. C. L. Briant and A. M. Ritter, Scripta Metall. 13 (1979) 177.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Idem., Metall. Trans. 11A (1981) 910.

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. Bose and P. K. De, Corrosion 43 (1987) 624.

    Google Scholar 

  5. L. E. Murr, A. H. Advani, S. Shankar and D. G. Atteridge, Mater. Characterization 24 (1990) 135.

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. H. Advani, L. E. Murr, D. G. Atteridge, R. Chelakara and S. M. Bruemmer, Corrosion 47 (1991) 939.

    Google Scholar 

  7. A. H. Advani, L. E. Murr, D. G. Atteridge and R. Chelakara, Metall. Trans. 22A (1991) 2917.

    Google Scholar 

  8. E. A. Trillo, R. Beltran, J. G. Maldonado, R. J. Romero, L. E. Murr, W. W. Fisher and A. H. Advani, Mater. Characterization 35 (1995) 99.

    Google Scholar 

  9. E. A. Trillo and L. E. Murr, Acta Mater. 47(1) (1998) 235.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. G. Maldonado, A. H. Advani, L. E. Murr and W. W. Fisher, in “Microstructural Science, Vol. 21,” edited by C. R. Brooks and M. R. Louthan, Jr. (ASM International, Materials Park, OH, 1994) p. 23.

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. G. Maldonado, L. E. Murr and W. W. Fisher, in Iron and Steel Society Proceedings, 37th MWSP Conf. Proc., ISS XXXIII, 1996, p. 849.

  12. L. E. Murr, K. P. Staudhammer and S. S. Hecker, Metall. Trans. 13A (1982) 627.

    Google Scholar 

  13. K. P. Staudhammer, L. E. Murr and S. S. Hecker, Acta Metall. et Materialia 33 (1983) 267.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Standard test method for determining average grain size, Annual Book of Standards, 3.01 (E112-88) (American Society for Testing Materials, Philadelphia, PA, 1988).

  15. A. H. Advani, Ph.D. dissertation, Oregon Graduate Institute, Portland, OR, 1989.

  16. S. M. Bruemmer, Ph.D. dissertation, Oregon Graduate Insti-tute, Portland, OR, 1988.

  17. T. Thorvaldasson and A. Salwen, Scripta Metall. 18 (1984) 739.

    Google Scholar 

  18. R. Beltran, M.S. thesis, The University of Texas at EI Paso, EI Paso, TX, 1996.

  19. P. L. Andresen, D. D. Solomon and D. F. Taylor, EPRI NP-1823, Project 1072-1 (Final Report), Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA, May, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Almanza, E., Murr, L.E. A comparison of sensitization kinetics in 304 and 316 stainless steels. Journal of Materials Science 35, 3181–3188 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004886213848

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004886213848

Keywords

Navigation