Abstract
A distinctive crystalline morphology which develops in certain fiber-reinforced thermoplastics, termed "transcrystallinity", occurs as the result of dense nucleation of polymer crystals at the surface of reinforcing fibers. As these fiber-sponsored nuclei grow, they impinge upon one another, such that crystal growth occurs essentially perpendicular to the fiber axis. Previous studies concerning transcrystallized composites have generally focused on single-fiber composites or model systems. Our interest is in elucidating the crystal orientation in conventional fiber-reinforced composites, and in quantifying the fraction of transcrystallized matrix, where present. In the present work, we develop a wide-angle X-ray scattering (WAXS) technique to investigate composites formed from an isotactic polypropylene (PP) matrix with practical loading levels of unidirectional pitch-based carbon, polyacrylonitrile (PAN)-based carbon, or aramid fibers. The transcrystalline fraction of the crystalline matrix approaches 0.95 in pitch-based carbon composites and 0.50 in the aramid composites near fiber loadings of 30 vol %. In addition, a previously-unreported mode of matrix orientation is observed in composites containing the non-transcrystallizing PAN-based carbon fibers, arising from restrictions on the isotropic growth of PP crystallites by the unidirectional fibers. This "constrained growth" orientation can coexist with the transcrystallized matrix at lower fiber loadings.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
M. J. Folkes in “Polypropylene Structure, Blends, and Composites,” edited by J. Karger-Kocsis (Chapman & Hall, London, 1995 Vol. 3) p. 340.
E. J. H. Chen and B. S. Hsiao, Polym. Eng. Sci. 32 (1992) 280.
M. J. Folkes and S. T. Hardwick, J. Mat. Sci. 25 (1990) 2598.
E. G. Lovering, J. Polym. Sci. Part A2. 8 (1970) 1697.
T. Hata, K. Ohsaka, T. Yamada, K. Nakamae, N. Shibata and T. Matsumoto, J. Adhesion 45 (1994) 125.
V. E. Reinsch and L. Rebenfeld, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 52 (1994) 649.
L. C. Lopez and G. L. Wilkes, Polymer 29 (1988) 106.
G. P. Desio and L. Rebenfeld, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 44 (1992) 1991.
N. A. Mehl and L. Rebenfeld, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 57 (1995) 187.
J. Varga, J. Mat. Sci. 27 (1992) 2557.
A. J. Lovinger, J. Polym. Sci.: Polym. Phys. 21 (1983) 97.
M. Hikosaka and T. Seto, Polym. Journal 5 (1973) 111.
F. L. Binsbergen and B. G. M. Delange, Polymer 9 (1968) 23.
B. Lotz and J. C. Wittmann, J. Polym. Sci.: Part B: Polym. Phys. 24 (1986) 1541.
R. J. Samuels and R. Y. Yee, J. Polym. Sci.: Part A2 10 (1972) 385.
D. R. Norton and A. Keller, Polymer 26 (1985) 204.
S. BrÜckner and S. V. Meille, Nature 340 (1989) 455.
S. V. Meille, S. BrÜckner and W. Porzio, Macromolecules 23 (1990) 4114.
R. L. Miller, Polymer 1 (1960) 135.
M. Gezorich and P. H. Geil, Polym. Eng. Sci. 8 (1968) 202.
R. N. Lee, in “International Encyclopedia of Composites, Vol. 1,” edited by S. M. Lee (VCH Publishers Inc., 1990) 241.
S. Y. Hobbs, Nature 234 (1971) 12.
D. P. Anderson and S. Kumar, SPE Annual Tech. Conf. (1990) 1248.
A. J. Greso and P. J. Phillips, Polymer 37 (1996) 3165.
E. S. Clark and J. E. Spruiell, Polym. Eng. Sci. 16 (1976) 176.
D. M. Dean, PhD Thesis, Princeton University (1998).
M. Kakudo and N. Kasai, in “X-ray Diffraction by Polymers” (Elsevier Publishing Co., 1972) 231.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dean, D.M., Rebenfeld, L., Register, R.A. et al. Matrix molecular orientation in fiber-reinforced polypropylene composites. Journal of Materials Science 33, 4797–4812 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004474128452
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004474128452