Abstract
Fourteen phenotypic characters were chosen for the purpose of obtaining taxonomic evidence on the resemblances of 177 accessions of sorghum from North Shewa and South Welo regions of Ethiopia. Canonical Discriminant Analysis (CDA) and Modeclus cluster analysis were conducted to see if the 177 accessions could form clusters based on their morphological characters, and to test the consistency of farmers’ naming of the five most common Sorghum landraces represented by 44 accessions. Multivariate analyses grouped the 177 accessions into three clusters linked by a few phenotypic intermediate landraces. A botanical key was established for easy classification of the Sorghum crop plants grown in the study area. The number of accessions of the five most common landraces named by the farmers formed dissimilar groups, suggesting that farmers’ naming of these Sorghum landraces are consistent. Midrib color, grain color, grain size, glume color, glume hairiness, and grain shape were the leading morphological characters used by the farmers in naming these Sorghum landraces.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Appa Rao, S., Prasada Rao, K.E., Mengesha, M.H., & V. Gopal Reddy, 1996. Morphological diversity in sorghum germplasm from India. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 43: 559–567.
Berlin, B., D.E. Breedlove & P.H. Raven, 1973. General principles of classification and nomenclature in folk biology. American Anthropologist 75: 214–242.
Berlin, B., D.E. Breedlove & P.H. Raven, 1974. Principles of Tazetal plant classification. An introduction to the botanical ethnography of a Mayan-speaking people of highland Chiapas. Academic Press. New York and London.
Brush, S.B., H.J. Carney, & Z. Huaman, 1981. Dynamics of Andean potato agriculture. Economic Botany, 35: 70–88.
Chantereau, J., Arnaud, M., Ollitrault, P., Nabayaogo, P. & J.L. Noyer, 1989. Etude de la diversité morphophysiologique et classification des sorghos cultivés. Agronomie Tropicale, 44: 223–232.
Clayton, W.D., 1961. Proposal to conserve the generic name Sorghum Moench (Gramineae) versus Sorghum Adans (Gramineae). Taxon 10: 242–243.
de Wet, J.M.J., 1978. Systematics and evolution of Sorghum sect. bicolor (Gramineae). American Journal of Botany 65: 477–484.
de Wet, J.M.J. & J.P. Huckabay, 1967. Origin of Sorghum bicolor. II. Distribution and Domestication. Evolution 21: 787–802.
Doggett, H., 1957. Tetraploid varieties of Sorghum vulgare, Nature. 179: 786.
Doggett, H., 1988. Sorghum. 2nd edition Longman, Burnt Mill, Harlow, Essex, England.
Exell, A.W., 1960. Systematic Association Committee For Descriptive Terminology. Taxon 9: 240–257.
Exell, A.W., 1962. Systematic Association Committee for Descriptive Terminology. Taxon 11: 145–156.
Frankel, O.H., 1974. Genetic Conservation: Our evolutionary responsibility. Genetics. 78: 53–65.
Harlan, J.R., 1969. Ethiopia: A center of diversity. Economic Botany 23: 309–314.
Harlan, J.R., 1975. Crops and Man. The American Society of Agronomy, Inc. and the Crop Science Society of America, Inc. Madison, Wisconsin.
Harlan, J.R. & J.M.J. de Wet, 1972. A simplified classification of cultivated sorghum. Crop Science 12: 172–176.
Harlan, J.R., J.M.J. de Wet & A.B.L. Stemler. 1976. Origin of African plant domestication. Mouton, The Hague.
Hawkes, J.G., 1983. The diversity of crop plants. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, England.
House, L.R., 1978. A guide to Sorghum breeding. International Crop Research Institute for Semi Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru, A.P., India.
House, L.R., 1995. Sorghum and Millets: History, Taxonomy, And Distribution. In: D.A.V. Dendy (Ed.), Sorghum and Millets: Chemistry and Technology. American Association of Cereal Chemists. St. Paul, Minn.
Hunn, E., 1982. The Utilitarian Factor in Folk Biological Classification. American Anthropologist 84: 830–847.
IBAS, 1990. (Interaktives Bild — Analysen System/Interactive Image Analysis System) User's Manual, Rel 2.0. 1990. Kontron Elektronik Gambh.
International Plant Genetic Resources Institute (IPGRI), 1993. Descriptors for Sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench]. IBPGR/ICRISAT. Rome, Italy.
Martin, G.J., 1995. Ethnobotany. Chapman and Hall, London, UK.
Morrison, D.F., 1967. Multivariate Statistical Methods. McGraw-Hill. NY.
Munsell Color Company, 1957. Nickerson Color Fan. Maximum Chromas-40 Hues. Munsell color Co., INC. Baltimore, Maryland.
Pimentel, R.A., 1979. Morphometrics. The Multivariate Analyses of Biological Data. Hunt, Dubuque. Iowa.
Rohlf, F.J., 1992. NTSYS-pc, Numerical Taxonomy and Multivariate Analysis System, Version 1.70. Users' Manual. Exeter Publishing, Setauket, NY.
SAS Institute, 1992. SAS/STAT Users' Guide. Volume 1, SAS Institute Inc. Cary, NC.
Sass, J.E., 1958. Botanical microtechnique. 3rd ed. Iowa State College Press. Ames, Iowa.
Sneath, P.H.A. & R.R. Sokal, 1973. Numerical Taxonomy: The Principles and Practice of Numerical Classification. W.H. Freeman. San Francisco.
Snowden, J.D., 1936. The cultivated races of sorghum. Adlard and Son, London.
Stace, C.A., 1989. Plant Taxonomy and Biosystematics. 2nd edition, Routledge, Chapman and Hall Inc, NY.
Stemler, A.B.L., J.R. Harlan & J.M.J. de Wet., 1977. The Sorghums of Ethiopia. Economic Botany 31: 446–460.
Vavilov, N.I., 1926. Studies on the origin of cultivated plants. State Press, Leningrad.
Vavilov, N.I., 1951. The origin, variation, immunity, and breeding of cultivated plants. In: Selected Writings of N.I. Vavilov. Chronica Botanica.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Teshome, A., Baum, B., Fahrig, L. et al. Sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] landrace variation and classification in North Shewa and South Welo, Ethiopia. Euphytica 97, 255–263 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003074008785
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003074008785