Abstract
This study aims to analyse larval habitat preferences and landscape level population structure of the threatened Marsh Fritillary butterfly, Euphydryas aurinia, and discusses implications for the conservation and management of this strongly declining species in central Europe. Whereas current management strategies are mainly based on studies of habitat requirements of adult individuals, we intend to emphasise larval habitat quality and population processes at the landscape level as additional key factors. Microhabitat preference analysis of egg-laying females showed that eggs were predominantly laid on prominent large-sized host plant individuals. Additionally, when Succisa pratensis was used as a host plant (as opposed to Gentiana asclepiadea), host individuals in open vegetation structure were preferred. Optimal oviposition conditions were present in recently abandoned calcareous fen meadows and at the edges of such meadows currently in use. A two-year patch-occupancy study in the northern pre-alpine region of south-west Germany indicated that E. aurinia lives in a metapopulation. In a logistic-regression model, patch size, isolation, and habitat quality explained 82% of the observed patch-occupancy pattern in 2001. Our data suggest that a suitable conservation strategy must incorporate both the conservation of a network of suitable habitat patches, and efforts to maximise local habitat quality by ensuring that host plants can grow to a large size and are surrounded by sparse and low vegetation cover.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anthes N., Hermann G. and Fartmann T.2003. Wie lässt sich der Rückgang des Goldenen Scheckenfalters (Euphydryas aurinia) in Mitteleuropa stoppen? Erkenntnisse aus populationsökologischen Studien in voralpinen Niedermoorgebieten und der Arealentwicklung in Deutschland. Naturschutz und Landschaftsplanung35: 279–287.
Asher J., Warren M., Fox R., Harding P., Jeffcoate G. and Jeffcoate S.2001. The millenium atlas of butterflies in Britain and Ireland. Oxford University Press.
Boughton D.A.1999. Empirical evidence for complex source-sink dynamics with alternative states in a butterfly metapopulation. Ecology80: 2727–2739.
Bühler C. and Schmid B.2001. The influence of management regime and altitude on the population of Succisa pratensis: implications for vegetation monitoring. J. Appl. Ecol.38: 689–698.
Dennis R.L.H. and Eales H.T.1997. Patch occupancy in Coenonympha tullia (Muller, 1764) (Lepidoptera: Satyrinae): habitat quality matters as much as patch size and isolation. J. Insect Conserv.1: 167–176.
Dierschke H.1994. Pflanzensoziologie, Ulmer Verlag, Stuttgart.
Dolek M.2000. Der Einsatz der Beweidung in der Landschaftspflege: Untersuchungen an Tagfaltern als Zeigergruppe. Laufener Seminarbeiträge4/2000: 63–77.
Dolek M. and Geyer A.1997. Influence of management on butterflies of rare grassland ecosystems in Germany. J. Insect Conserv.1: 125–130.
Dolek M., Radlmair S. and Geyer A.1999. Der Einfluss der Nutzung (Weide, Mahd, Brache) voralpiner Moorgebiete auf die Insektenfauna (Tagfalter, Heuschrecken). Schriftenreihe des Bayerischen Landesamts für Umweltschutz150: 133–140.
Ebert G. and Rennwald E.1991. Die Schmetterlinge Baden-Württembergs. Band 1, Tagfalter I. Verlag Eugen Ulmer, Stuttgart.
Fartmann T.1997. Biozönologische Untersuchungen zur Heuschreckenfauna auf Magerrasen im Naturpark Märkische Schweiz (Ostbrandenburg). Arbeiten aus dem Institut für Landschaftsökologie, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster3: 1–62.
Fartmann T., Hafner S. and Hermann G.2001. Skabiosen-Scheckenfalter (Euphydryas aurinia). In: Fartmann T., Gunnemann H., Salm P. and Schröder E. (eds), Berichtspflichten in Natura-2000-Gebieten. Empfehlungen zur Erfassung der Arten des Anhangs II und Charakterisierung der Lebensraumtypen des Anhangs I der FFH-Richtlinie (= Angewandte Landschaftsökologie, Heft 42), Bundesamt für Naturschutz, Bonn, pp. 363–368.
Fischer K.1997. Zur ökologie des Skabiosen-Scheckenfalters Euphydryas aurinia (Rottemburg, 1775) (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Nachr. Entomol. Ver. Apollo18: 287–300.
Fischer K., Beinlich B. and Plachter H.1999. Population structure, mobility and habitat preferences of the violet copper Lycaena helle (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) in Western Germany: implications for conservation. J. Insect Conserv.3: 43–52.
Ford H.D. and Ford E.B.1930. Fluctuation in numbers, and its influence on variation in Melitaea aurinia, Rott. (Lepidoptera). Trans. Entomol. Soc. Lond.78: 345–351.
Hanski I.1994. A practical model of metapopulation dynamics. J. Anim. Ecol.63: 151–162.
Hanski I.1999. Metapopulation Ecology, 1st edn, Oxford University Press.
Hermann G.1998. Erfassung von Präimaginalstadien bei Tagfaltern–Ein notwendiger Standard für Bestandsaufnahmen zu Planungsvorhaben. Naturschutz und Landschaftsplanung30: 133–142.
Hermann G. and Steiner R.1997. Eiablage-und Larvalhabitat des Komma-Dickkopffalters (Hesperia comma Linné 1758). Carolinea55: 35–42.
Kuussaari M., Nieminen M. and Hanski I.1996. An experimental study of migration in the glanville fritillary butterfly Melitaea cinxia. J. Anim. Ecol.65: 791–801.
Lavery T.A.1993. A review of the distribution, ecology and status of the marsh fritillary Euphydryas aurinia Rottemburg, 1775 (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) in Ireland. Ir. Nat. J.24: 192–199.
Lewis O.T. and Hurford C.1997. Assessing the status of the marsh fritillary butterfly (Eurodryas aurinia): an example from Glamorgan, UK. J. Insect Conserv.1: 159–166.
Lewis O.T., Thomas C.D., Hill J.K., Brookes M.I., Crane T.P.R., Graneau Y.A., Mallet J.L.B. and Rose O.C.1997. Three ways of assessing metapopulation structure in the butterfly Plebejus argus.Ecol. Entomol.22: 283–293.
Mazel R.1984. Trophisme, hybridation et Speciation chez Eurodryas aurinia Rottemburg (Lepidoptera–Nymphalidae). PhD thesis, University of Perpignan, France.
Moilanen A. and Hanski I.2001. On the use of connectivity measures in spatial ecology. Oikos95: 147–151.
Munguira M.L., Martin J., Garcia-Barros E. and Viejo J.L.1997. Use of space and resources in a Mediterranean population of the butterfly Euphydryas aurinia. Acta Oecologica18: 597–612.
Oates M.R. and Warren M.S.1990. A Review of Butterfly Introductions in Britain and Ireland. World Wide Fund for Nature, Godalming.
Oppermann R.1987. Tierökologische Untersuchungen zum Biotopmanagement in Feuchtwiesen. Ergebnisse einer Feldstudie an Schmetterlingen und Heuschrecken im württembergischen Alpenvorland. Natur und Landschaft62: 235–241.
Porter K.1982. Basking behaviour in larvae of the butterfly Euphydryas aurinia. Oikos38: 308–312.
Porter K.1983. Multivoltinism in Apanteles bignelli and the influence of weather on synchronisation with its host Euphydryas aurinia. Ent. exp. & appl.34: 155–162.
Porter K.1992. Eggs and egg-laying. In: Dennis R.L.H. (Ed.)The ecology of butterflies in Britain, Oxford University Press, pp. 46–72.
Reich M. and Grimm V.1995. Das Metapopulationskonzept in ökologie und Naturschutz: Eine kritische Bestandsaufnahme. Z. ökologie u. Naturschutz5: 123–139.
SBN (Schweizer Bund für Naturschutz), 1991. Tagfalter und ihre Lebensräume. Arten, Gefährdung, Schutz. Band 1. Fotorotar, Basel.
Scholle D., Hofmann C., Kaule G., Lederbogen D., Rosenthal G., Thumm U. and Trautner J.2002. Co-operative grazing systems ('Allmende'): An alternative concept for the management of endangered open and semi-open landscapes. In: Redecker B., Fink P., Härdtle W., Riecken U. and Schröder E. (eds), Pasture Landscapes and Nature Conservation, Springer, Berlin, pp. 387–398.
Settele J.1998. Metapopulationsanalyse auf Rasterdatenbasis. Teubner Verlagsgesellschaft, Stuttgart.
Sternberg K.1995. Populationsökologische Untersuchungen an einer Metapopulation der Hochmoor-Mosaikjungfer (Aeshna subarctica elisabethaea Djakonov, 1922) (Odonata, Aeshnidae) im Schwarzwald. Z. ökologie u. Naturschutz4: 53–60.
Sundermeier A.1999. Zur Vegetationsdichte der Xerothermrasen nordwestlich von Halle/Saale–Erfassungsmethoden, strukturelle Vegetationstypen und der Einfluß der Vegetationsdichte auf das reproduktive Potential von Xerothermrasenarten. Dissertationes Botanicae316: 1–192.
Thomas C.D., Wilson R.J. and Lewis O.T.2002. Short-term studies underestimate 30-generation changes in a butterfly metapopulation. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B269: 563–569.
Thomas J.A., Bourn N.A.D., Clarke R.T., Stewart K.E., Simcox D.J., Pearman G.S., Curtis R. and Goodger B.2001. The quality and isolation of habitat patches both determine where butterflies persist in fragmented landscapes. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B268: 1791–1796.
Thomas J.A. and Morris M.G.1994. Patterns, mechanisms and rates of decline among UK invertebrates. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B344: 47–54.
van Swaay C. and Warren M.1999. Red data book of European butterflies (Rhopalocera). In: Council of Europe, Nature and Environment, No. 99, Strasbourg, France.
Wahlberg N.2001. The phylogenetics and biochemistry of host-plant specialization in Melitaeine butterflies (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Evolution55: 522–537.
Wahlberg N., Klemetti T. and Hanski I.2002a. Dynamic populations in a dynamic landscape: the metapopulation structure of the marsh fritillary butterfly. Ecography25: 224–232.
Wahlberg N., Klemetti T., Selonen V. and Hanski I.2002b. Metapopulation structure and movements in five species of checkerspott butterflies. Oecologia130: 33–43.
Warren M.S.1994. The UK status and suspected metapopulation structure of a threatened European butterfly, the marsh fritillary (Eurodryas aurinia). Biol. Conserv.67: 239–249.
Warren M.S., Munguira M.L. and Ferrin J.1994. Notes on the distribution, habitats and conservation of Eurodryas aurinia (Rottemburg) (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) in Spain. Entomologists' Gazette45: 5–12.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Anthes, N., Fartmann, T., Hermann, G. et al. Combining larval habitat quality and metapopulation structure – the key for successful management of pre-alpine Euphydryas aurinia colonies. Journal of Insect Conservation 7, 175–185 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1027330422958
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1027330422958