Skip to main content
Log in

Inferring Student Learning Behaviour from Website Interactions: A Usage Analysis

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Web-based learning environments are now used extensively as integral components of course delivery in tertiary education. To provide an effective learning environment, it is important that educators understand how these environments are used by their students. In conventional teaching environments educators are able to obtain feedback on student learning experiences in face-to-face interactions with their students, enabling continual evaluation of their teaching programs. However, when students work in electronic environments, this informal monitoring is not possible; educators must look for other ways to attain this information. Capturing and recording student interactions with a website provides a rich source of information from data that is gathered unobtrusively. The aim of this study was firstly to explore what information can be gained from analysing student interactions with Web-based learning environments and secondly to determine the value of this process in providing information about student learning behaviours and learning outcomes. This study has provided critical information to educators about the learning behaviour of their students, informing future enhancements and developments to a courseware website and the teaching program it supports.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arif, A. A. (2001) Learning from the Web: Are students ready or not? Educational Technology and Society, 4(4), 32–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates, A.W. (1997) Restructuring the university for technological change. Available at: http://bates.cstudies.ubc.ca/carnegie/carnegie.html(15 December 2000).

  • Cann, A. J. (1999) Approaches to the evaluation of online learning materials. Innovations in Education and Training International, 36(1), 44–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceddia, J., Tucker, S., Clemence, C., and Cambrell, A. (2001) WIER - Implementing artifact reuse in an educational environment with real products. Paper presented at the 31st Annual Frontiers in Education Conference, Reno, Nevada.

  • Chen, G.-D., Liu, C.-C., Ou, K.-L. and Liu, B.-J. (2000) Discovering decision knowledge from Web log portfolio for managing classroom processes by applying decision tree and data cube technology. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 23(3), 305–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comunale, C. L., Sexton, T. R., and Voss, D. J. P. (2001- 2002) The effectiveness of course Web sites in higher education. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 30(2), 171–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornell, R. (1999) Paradigms for the new millennium: How professors will certainly change! Educational Media International, 36(2), 89–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federico, P.-A. (1999) Hypermedia environments and adaptive instruction. Computers in Human Behaviour, 15(6), 653–692.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillham, M., Buckner, K., and Butt, R. (1999) The cautious student - a user-centred evaluation of Web-supported learning. Innovations in Education and Training International, 36(4), 327–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagan, D., Tucker, S., and Ceddia, J. (1999) Industrial experience products: A balance of process and product. Computer Science Education, 9(3), 106–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J. W. (1996) The educational paradigm shift: Implications for ICDE and the distance learning community. Open Praxis, 2, 27–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, S., Deshpande, Y., and Murugesan, S. (1999)Adoption of Web delivery by staff in education institutions. Issues, strategems and a pilot study. Paper presented at the AusWeb99, Lismore, NSW.

  • Harmon, S. W. and Jones, M. G. (1999) The five levels of Web use in education: Factors to consider in planning online courses. Educational Technology, 39(6), 28–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heines, J. M. (1998) Evaluating the effect of a course Web site on student performance. Available at: www.cs.uml.edu/~heines/academic/papers/course web site/ (3 April 2000). Ingram, A. L. (1999) Using Web server logs in evaluating instructional Web sites. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 28(2), 137–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kandies, J. and Stern, M. B. (1999) Weaving the Web into the classroom: An evolution of Web enhanced instruction. Paper presented at the SITE’ 99, San Antonio, Texas.

  • Lambert, S. and Williams, R. (1999) A model for selecting educational technologies to improve student learning. Paper presented at the HERDSA’ 99, Melbourne.

  • Lefoe, G. (1998) Creating constructivist learning environments on the Web: The challenge in higher education. Paper presented at the ASCJJLITE'98,Wollongong, NSW.

  • Lie, K. G. and Cano, V. (2001) Supporting diverse learners through a website for teaching methods. Educational Technology and Society, 4(3), 50–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, J. and Postle, G. (1999) Teaching online: Challenge to a reinterpretation of traditional instructional models. Paper presented at the AusWeb99, Lismore, NSW.

  • Mitchell, C., Dipetta, T., and Kerr, J. (2001) The frontier of Web-based Instruction. Education and Information Technologies, 6(2), 105–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muirhead, B. (2001) Interactivity research studies. Educational Technology and Society, 4(3), 108–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peled, A. and Rashty, D. (1999) Logging for success: Advancing the use of WWW logs to improve computer mediated distance learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 21(4), 413–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Persichitte, K. A. (1999) Tips for course conversion to the Web. Paper presented at the SITE’ 99, San Antonio, Texas.

  • Piguet, A. and Peraya, D. (2000) Creating Web-integrated learning environments: An analysis of WebCT authoring tools in respect to usability. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 16(3), 302–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, D. L. (2000) A paradigm shift: Technology integration in the new millenium. Educational Technology Review, 1(13), 19–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarantakos, S. (1998) Social Research (2nd edition). MacMillan Publishers, Australia Pty Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selim, H. M. (2003) An empirical investigation of student acceptance of course websites. Computers and Education.

  • Sheard, J., Ceddia, J., Tuovinen, J., and Hurst, J. (Submitted) Determining website usage time from interactions: Data preparation and analysis. Journal of Educational Technology Systems.

  • Sheard, J., Postema, M., and Markham, S. (2001) Time versus utility: What IT staff say about the educational use of the Web. Paper presented at the EdMedia 2001, Tampere, Finland.

  • Sims, R. (2000) Interactive encounters: Maximising useability and learning in on-line environments. Paper presented at the AusWeb2K, Cairns, Queensland.

  • Wang, L.-C. C. and Beasley, W. (2002) Effects of learner control and hypermedia preference on cyber-students performance in aWeb-based learning environment. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 11(1), 71–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Windschitl, M. (1998) The WWW and classroom research: What path should we take? Educational Researcher, 27(1), 28–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yates, P. (2000) Use of World Wide Web access statistics to monitor study patterns in physical chemistry. British Journal of Educational Technology, 31(3), 254–256.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sheard, J., Ceddia, J., Hurst, J. et al. Inferring Student Learning Behaviour from Website Interactions: A Usage Analysis. Education and Information Technologies 8, 245–266 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026360026073

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026360026073

Navigation