Skip to main content
Log in

Agronomic evaluation of Leucaena. Part 2. Productivity of the genus for forage production in subtropical Australia and humid-tropical Philippines

  • Published:
Agroforestry Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Leucaena leucocephala is an important agroforestry species pan-tropically, but relatively little is known of the forage production potential of other species in the genus. The agronomic potential of 116 accessions, represent ing the 28 species and subspecies of the Leucaena genus and several artificial hybrid accessions, was evaluated at Los Baños, Philippines and Brisbane, Australia over a 2.5–year period. Accessions were planted into replicated line plots, with 10 trees/plot spaced 50 cm apart, and with rows spaced 3 m apart. The L. pallida × L. leuco cephala KX2 F 1 hybrid accessions were highest yielding at both sites, producing dry matter (DM) yields of over 900 g/m row/month at Los Baños and approximately 320 g/m row/month at Brisbane. In the near-optimal growth conditions at Los Baños, L. leucocephala accessions were highly productive, with the best accessions producing total yields of over 500 g/m row/month. The superiority of KX2 hybrids was most pronounced at Brisbane, where high psyllid pressure during summer, and low temperatures during winter severely constrained growth of L. leu cocephala accessions. In the Brisbane environment, psyllid resistant accessions of L. pallida , L. trichandra and L. diversifolia were more productive than L. leucocephala accessions. Leucaena greggii , L. retusa , L. cuspidata , L. confertiflora , L. pulverulenta , L. pueblana and L. involucrata were of inherently low productivity in both the Brisbane and Los Baños environments. Mortality over the experimental period was very low for most species, particularly for L. leucocephala and KX2 accessions. The KX2 F1 hybrid accessions have considerable agro nomic potential as alternatives to L. leucocephala for use in tropical agroforestry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Argel P.J. and Perez G.1998. Adaptation of new species of Leucaena in Costa Rica, Central America-Preliminary results. In: Shelton H.M., Gutteridge R.C., Mullen B.F. and Bray R.A. (Eds.), Leucaena-Adaptation, Quality and Farming Systems. Proceedings of a workshop held in Hanoi, Vietnam 9–14 February 1998. ACIAR, Canberra, Australia. pp. 146–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin M.T., Williams M.J., Hammond A.C., Frank J.H. and Chambliss C.G.1995. Establishment, forage production, and nutritive value of Leucaena in Central Florida. Agronomy Journal87: 915–920.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austin M.T., Early R.J., Brewbaker J.L. and Sun W.1997. Yield, psyllid resistance, and phenolic concentration of Leucaena in two environments in Hawaii. Agronomy Journal89: 507–515.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Austin M.T., Sun W., Brewbaker J.L. and Schifino-Wittman M.T.1998. Developing Leucaena hybrids for commercial use. In: Shelton H.M., Gutteridge R.C., Mullen B.F. and Bray R.A. (Eds.), Leucaena-Adaptation, Quality and Farming Systems. Proceedings of a workshop held in Hanoi, Vietnam 9–14 February 1998. ACIAR, Canberra, Australia. pp. 82–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bray R.A. and Woodroffe T.D.1988. Resistance of some Leucaena species to the leucaena psyllid. Tropical Grasslands22: 11–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bray R.A., Cooksley D.G., Hall T.J. and Ratcliff D.1988. Performance of fourteen Leucaena lines at five sites in Queen sland. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture28: 69–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castillo A.C., Acasio R.N., Victorio E.E., Moog F.A. and Palis R.1998. Agronomic performance of new Leucaena species and hy brids in the Philippines. In: Shelton H.M., Gutteridge R.C., Mullen B.F. and Bray R.A. (Eds.), Leucaena-Adaptation, Quality and Farming Systems.Proceedings of a workshop held in Hanoi, Vietnam 9–14 February 1998. ACIAR, Canberra, Australia. pp. 116–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castillo A.C., Cuyagan O.C., Fogarty S. and Shelton H.M.1997. Growth, psyllid resistance and forage quality of Leucaena leu cocephala, L. pallida, L. diversifolia and the F1 hybrid of L. leucocephala×L. pallida. TropicalGrasslands31: 188–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Ella A., Jacobsen C., Stur W.W. and Blair G.1989. Effect of plant density an cutting frequency on the productivity of four tree le gumes. Tropical Grasslands23: 28–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galgal K.K., Shelton H.M., Mullen B.F., and Komolong M.K.2000. Animal production potential of some new Leucaena geno types in the Markham Valley of Papua New Guinea. Australasian Journal of Science. 13: 242–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glumac E.L., Felker P. and Reyes I.1987. A comparison of cold tolerance and biomass production in Leucaena leucocephala, L. pulverulenta and L. retusa. Forest Ecology and Management18: 251–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes C.E.1998. Leucaena-A genetic resources handbook.Oxford Forestry Institute, Tropical Forestry Paper No. 37. Oxford, UK274 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes C.E. and Harris S.A.1995. Systematics of Leucaena: Recent findings and implications for breeding and conservation. In: Shelton H.M., Piggin C.M. and Brewbaker J.L., (Eds.), Leucaena-Opportunities and Limitations.Proceedings of an International Workshop held in Bogor Indonesia, 24–29 January 1994. ACIAR, Canberra, Australia. pp. 47–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones R.J.1998. Evaluation of Leucaena species in the dry tropics of N.E. Australia for yield and psyllid tolerance. In: Shelton H.M., Gutteridge R.C., Mullen B.F. and Bray R.A. (Eds.), Leucaena-Adaptation, Quality and Farming Systems. Proceedings of a workshop held in Hanoi, Vietnam 9–14 February 1998. ACIAR, Canberra, Australia. pp. 157–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Komolong M., Mullen B.F., Bino B., Tarabu J. and Galgal K.K.1998. Germplasm evaluation of new leucaenas in Papua New Guinea. In: Shelton H.M., Gutteridge R.C., Mullen B.F. and Bray R.A. (Eds.), Leucaena-Adaptation, Quality and Farming Systems. Proceedings of a workshop held in Hanoi, Vietnam 9–14 February 1998. ACIAR, Canberra, Australia. pp. 123–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Middleton C.H. and Clem R.1998. Evaluation of Leucaena germ plasm on clay soils in southern and central inland Queensland. In: Shelton H.M., Gutteridge R.C., Mullen B.F. and Bray R.A. (Eds.), Leucaena-Adaptation, Quality and Farming Systems. Proceedings of a workshop held in Hanoi, Vietnam 9–14 February 1998. ACIAR, Canberra, Australia. pp. 154–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullen B.F.2001. Agronomic adaptation to environmental challenges in the genus Leucaena. PhD Thesis. The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullen B.F., Gabunada F., Shelton H.M. and Stür W.W. (a) (in press). Psyllid resistance in Leucaena. Part 1. Genetic resistance of the genus in subtropical Australia and humid-tropical Philip pines. Agroforestry Systems.

  • Mullen B.F., Shelton H.M., Gutteridge R.C. and Basford K.E. (b) submitted. Agronomic evaluation of Leucaena. Part 1. Adaptation to environmental challenges in multi-environment trials. Agroforestry Systems

  • Shelton H.M., Piggin C.M. and Brewbaker J.L.1995. Leucaena:-Opportunities and Limitations. Proceedings of a workshop held on Bogor, Indonesia 24–29 January 1994. ACIAR, Canberra, Australia.

  • Shelton H.M. and Brewbaker J.L.1994. L. leucocephala-the most widely used forage tree legume. In: Gutteridge R.C. and Shelton H.M. (Eds.), Forage Tree Legumes in Tropical Agriculture. CAB International, Wallingford, UK. pp. 15–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shelton H.M., Norton B.W., Mullen B.F., Gutteridge R.C. and Dart P.J.1996. Utilization and nutritive value of Calliandra calothyrsus for forage: a review of research at the University of Queensland. In: Evans D.O. (Ed.), International Workshop on the Genus Calliandra, January 23–27, 1996. Bogor, Indonesia, Winrock International, Arkanas, USA. pp. 210–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorensson C.T.1995. Potential for improvement of Leucaena through interspecific hybridisation. In: Shelton H.M., Piggin C.M. and Brewbaker J.L. (Eds.), Leucaena:-Opportunities and Limitations. Proceedings of a workshop held on Bogor, Indonesia 24–29 January 1994. ACIAR, Canberra, Australia. pp. 47–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler R.A.1988. Leucaena psyllid trial at Waimanalo, Hawaii. Leucaena Research Reports8: 25–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler R.A. and Brewbaker J.L.1990. An evaluation of results from the Leucaena psyllid trial network. Leucaena Research Reports11: 23–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickremasinghe I.P. and Gunasena H.P.M.1998. Evaluation of sixteen Leucaena provenances for biomass production, drought tolerance and psyllid resistance in Sri Lanka. In: Shelton H.M., Gutteridge R.C., Mullen B.F. and Bray R.A. (Eds.), Leucaena-Adaptation, Quality and Farming Systems.Proceedings of a workshop held in Hanoi, Vietnam 9–14 February 1998. ACIAR, Canberra, Australia. pp. 120–122.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B.F. Mullen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mullen, B., Gabunada, F., Shelton, H. et al. Agronomic evaluation of Leucaena. Part 2. Productivity of the genus for forage production in subtropical Australia and humid-tropical Philippines. Agroforestry Systems 58, 93–107 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026040631267

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026040631267

Navigation