Skip to main content
Log in

Mathematical Formalism for the Properties of Four Basic Models of Indirect Pharmacodynamic Responses

  • Published:
Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Four basic models for characterizing indirect pharmacodynamic responses were proposed previously and applied using differential equations. These models consider inhibition or stimulation by drug of the production or loss of mediators or response variables. This report develops partially integrated solutions for these models which allow more detailed examination of the roles of model parameters and pharmacokinetic functions in affecting the time course of drug effects. Because of the nonlinear Hill function, the solutions are represented by means of definite integrals containing kinetic and dynamic functions. These solutions allow a qualitative examination, using calculus, of how response is controlled by Dose. IC50 or SC50, Imax or Smax, and kout for drugs exhibiting monotonic or biphasic disposition. Characteristics of the response curves that were identified include shape, maximum or minimum, and changes with the above parameters and time. These relationships, together with simulation studies, provide a fundamental basis for understanding the temporal aspects of the basic indirect response models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. N. L. Dayneka, V. Garg, and W. J. Jusko. Comparison of four basic models of indirect pharmacodynamic responses. J. Pharmacokin. Biopharm. 21:457–478 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. W. J. Jusko and H. C. Ko. Physiologic indirect response models characterize diverse types of pharmacodynamic effects. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 56:406–419 (1994).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. C. H. Edwards and D. E. Penney. Elementary Differential Equations with Applications, 3rd ed., Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1994, chap. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. Sharma and W. J. Jusko. Characterization of four basic models of indirect pharmacodynamic responses. J. Pharmacokin. Biopharm. 24:611–634 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. W. J. Jusko, H. C. Ko, and W. F. Ebling. Convergence of direct and indirect pharmacodynamic response models, J. Pharmacokin. Biopharm. 23:5–8 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Krzyzanski, W., Jusko, W.J. Mathematical Formalism for the Properties of Four Basic Models of Indirect Pharmacodynamic Responses. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn 25, 107–123 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025723927981

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025723927981

Navigation