Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Optimization of soil physical and chemical conditions for the bioremediation of creosote-contaminated soil

  • Published:
Biodegradation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mispah type soil (FAO : Lithosol) contaminated with >250 000 mg kg-1 creosote was collected from the yard of a creosote treatment plant. The soils carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus contents were determined. Due to creosote contamination, thecarbon content of the soil was found to be 130,000 mg C kg-1. This concentration was found to greatly affect the nitrogen content (0.08%). The phosphorus content was less affected (4.5%). It was estimated that a nutrient amendment to bring the soil to a C : N 10 : 1 would be adequate to stimulate microbial growth and creosote degradation. The soil was amended with a range of C : N ratios below and above the estimated ratio. In one of the treatments, the phosphorus content was amended. Sterile and natural controls were also set up. The soil was incubated at 30 °C on a rotaryshaker at 150 rpm in the dark for six weeks. Water content was maintained at 70% field capacity. The lowest nitrogen supplementation (C : N = 25 : 1) was more effective in enhancing microbial growth (3.12E + 05) and creosote removal (68.7%) from the soil. Additional phosphorus was not very effective in enhancing the growth of microorganisms and removal of creosote. The highest nitrogen supplementation(C : N = 5 : 1) did not enhance microbial growth and creosote removal.A relationship between mass loss and creosote removal was also observed. Phenolics and lower molecular mass polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) were observed to be more susceptible to microbial degradation than higher molecular mass compounds. Nutrient concentration, moisture content and pH were thus observed to play very significant roles in the utilization of creosote in soil. These results are being used for the development of a bioremediation technology for the remediation of creosote contaminated soils in a treatment plant in South Africa.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander M (1999) Biodegradation and Bioremediation (p. 302). Academic Press, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander M (1981) Biodegradation of chemicals of environmental concern. Science 211: 132–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander M (1977) Introduction to Soil Microbiology. John Wiley and Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Annweiler E, Richnow HH, Antranikian G, Hebenbrock S, Garms C, Franke S, Francke W & Michealis W (2000) Naphthalene degradation and incorporation of naphthalene-derived carbon into biomass by the thermopile Bacillus thermoleovorans. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66: 518–523

    Google Scholar 

  • Atlas RM & Bartha R (1972) Degradation and mineralization of petroleum in seawater: Limitation by nitrogen and phosphorus. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 14: 308–318

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker KH & Herson DS (1994) Bioremediation. McGraw-Hill, Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartha R & Atlas RM (1977) The microbiology of aquatic oil spills. Adv. Appl. Micrbiol. 22: 225–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Bossert I & Bartha R (1984) The fate of petroleum hydrocarbons in soil ecosystems. In: Atlas RM(Ed). Petroleum Microbiology (pp 399–434). MacMillan Publishing Company, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown RA, Dey JC & McFarland WE (1991) Integrated site remediation combining groundwater treatment, soil vapor extraction and bioremediation. In: Hinchee RE & Olfenbuttel RF (Eds) In Situ Biormediation and Investigation for Hydrocarbons and Contaminated Site Remediation. Butterworth-Heineman, Stoneham, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Dibble J & Bartha R (1979) Effect of environmental parameters on the biodegradation of oil sludge. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 37: 729–739

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyreborg S, Arvin E, Broholm K & Löfvall M (1995) Biodegradation of creosote compounds coupled with toxicity studies. In: Hinchee RE, Brockman FJ & Vogel CM (Eds), Microbial Processes for Remediation (pp 213–221). Battelle Press, Columbus, Ohio

    Google Scholar 

  • Edgehill RU (1994) Pentachlorophenol removal from slightly acidic mineral salts, commercial sand, and clay soil by recovered Arthrobacter strain ATCC 33790. Appl Microbiol. Biotechnol. 41: 142–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Edgehill RU & Finn RK (1983) Microbial treatment of soils to remove pentachlorophenol. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 45: 1122–1125

    Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson M, Dalhammar G & Borg-Karlson A-K (2000) Biological degradation of selected hydrocarbons in an old PAH/creosote contaminated soil from a gas work site. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 53: 619–626

    Google Scholar 

  • Forster JC (1995) Determination of the gravimetric water content and soil dry mass. In: Alef K & Nannipieri P (Eds), Methods in Applied Soil Microbiology and Biochemistry. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson DT & Subramanian V (1984) Microbial degradation of aromatic hydrocarbons. In: Gibson DT (Ed), Microbial Degradation of Organic Compounds (pp 182–252). Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghoshal S & Luthy RG (1998) Biodegradation kinetics of naphthalene in nonaqueous phase liquid-water mixed batch system: Comparison of model predictions and experimental results. Biotech. Bioengin. 57: 356–366

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghoshal S, Ramaswami A & Luthy RG (1996) Biodegradation of naphthalene from coal tar and heptamethylnonane in mixed batch systems. Environ. Sc. Technol. 30: 1282–1291

    Google Scholar 

  • Haggblom MM & Valo RJ (1995) Bioremediation of chlorophenol wastes. In: Young, LY & Cerniglia CE (Eds), Microbial Transformation and Degradation of Toxic Organic Chemicals (pp 389–434). Wiley-Liss, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen LD, Nestler C, Ringelberg D, Pritchard H & Jones-Meehan J. (2000) Bioremediation of PAH/PCP contaminated soils from Popile wood Treatment facility. In: Wickramanayake GB, Gavakar AR, Gibbs JT & Means JL (Eds), Case Studies in the Remediation of Chlorinated and Recalcitrant Compounds (pp 145–152). Battelle Press, Columbus, Ohio, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Jobson AL, McLaughling M, Cook FD & Westlake DWS (1974) Effects of amendments on the microbial utilization of oil applied to soil. Appl. Microbiol. 27: 166–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Knackmuss H-J (1992) Potentials and limitations of microbes to degrade xenobiotics. In Soil decontamination using biological processes. Organized by Deutsche Gesellschaft für Chemisches Apparatewesen, Chemisce Technik und Biotechnologie e.V, Vereinigung für Allgemeine und Angewandte Mikrobiologie e.V and EFB Task Group on Soil Decontamination using Biological processes. pp 3–9

  • Lajoie CA & Strom PF (1994) Biodegradation of polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons in coal tar oil contaminated soil. In: Wise DL & Trantolo DJ (Eds), Remediation of Hazardous Waste Contaminated Soils. Marcel Dekker Inc. New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lees ZM (1996) Bioremediation of oil-contaminated soil: A South African case study. A PhD thesis submitted to the University of Natal, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa

    Google Scholar 

  • Manohar S & Karegoudar TB (1998) Degradation of naphthalene by cells of Pseudomonas sp. strain NGK1 immobilized in alginate, agar and polyacrylamide. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 49: 785–792

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller JG, Lantz SE, Blattmann BO & Chapman PJ (1991) Bench-scale evaluation of alternative biological treatment processes for the remediation of pentachlorophenol-and creosotecontaminated materials: solid-phase bioremediation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 25: 1045–1055

    Google Scholar 

  • Parr JF, Sikora LJ & Burge WD (1983) Factors affecting the degradation and inactivation of waste constituents in soil. In: Parr JF, Marsh PB & Kla JM (Eds), Land Treatment of Hazardous Wastes (pp 20–49). Noyes Publishing, Park Ridge New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Raymond RL, Hudson JO & Jamieson VW (1976) Oil degradation in soil. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 31: 522–535

    Google Scholar 

  • Riser-Roberts E (1992) Bioremediation of petroleum contaminated sites. C.K. Smoley, Boca Raton, Florida, pp. 82–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg E, Gottlieb A & Rosenber M (1983) Inhibition of bacterial adherence to hydrocarbon and epithelial cells by emulsan. Infect. Immun. 39: 1024–1028

    Google Scholar 

  • Tate RL (1995) Soil Microbiology. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 398 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Thibault GT & Elliot NW (1980) Biological detoxification of hazardous organic chemical spills. In: Proceedings of USEPA Conference on Control of Hazardous Material Spills, (pp 398–402). Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN

    Google Scholar 

  • USEPA (1983) Methods for chemical analysis of water and wastes. Washington DC

  • Verstraete WR, Vanlooke R, deBorger R & Verlinde A (1975) Modeling of the breakdown and mobilization of hydrocarbons in unsaturated soil layers. In: Sharpley JM & Kaplan AM (Eds) Proceedings of the Third International Biodegradation Symposium (pp 98–112). Applied Science Publishers Ltd., London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vipulanandan C, Wang S & Krishnan S (1994) Bioremediation of phenol. In: Wise DL & Trantolo DJ (Eds). Remediation of hazardous waste contaminated soils. Marcel Dekker Inc. New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Zitrides TG (1978) Mutant bacteria overcome growth inhibition in industrial waste facility, Industrial Wastes 24: 42–44

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Earth Sciences, Mangosuthu Technikon, P.O. Box 12363, Jacobs, Durban, 4026, South Africa

    H. I. Atagana

  2. School of Applied Environmental Sciences, University of Natal, Private Bag X01, Scottsville, Pietermaritzburg, 3209, South Africa

    H. I. Atagana, R. J. Haynes & F. M. Wallis

Authors
  1. H. I. Atagana
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. R. J. Haynes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. F. M. Wallis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Atagana, H.I., Haynes, R.J. & Wallis, F.M. Optimization of soil physical and chemical conditions for the bioremediation of creosote-contaminated soil. Biodegradation 14, 297–307 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024730722751

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024730722751

Search

Navigation