Skip to main content
Log in

Plant diversity in managed sal (Shorea robusta Gaertn.) forests of Gorakhpur, India: species composition, regeneration and conservation

  • Published:
Biodiversity & Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The sal (Shorea robusta) forest vegetation of Sohagibarawa Wildlife Sanctuary, Gorakhpur, India was analysed to assess plant diversity, regeneration pattern and the status of species conservation. A total of 208 plant species representing 165 genera and 72 families were recorded. Species richness, mean density and basal area of individuals in the observed forest were compared with those of other sal-dominated forests of India. The sal forest was rich in Papilionaceae (23 species), which contributed maximally to the total number of individuals of <30 cm girth. After sal, density was maximal for a leguminous shrub, Moghania chappar. In addition to the usual recruitment by seed, a number of species also showed non-seed regeneration through storage roots, sprouts or ramet proliferation. The individuals regenerating as sprouts from underground stem or storage organs contributed significantly to the sum total of individuals/ha. As much as 45.5% of the total individuals were of ramet origin and shared 10.6% of the total species richness of the forest. In stands facing moderate to low disturbance, thickets of dense entangled mass of vegetation, predominantly composed of thorny lianas, were identified that usually contained less common and rare species like Rauwolfia serpentina, Desmodium latifolium, Crotalaria alata and Gloriosa superba in addition to the frequent ones. These thickets help to conserve the special habitat conditions and provide protection for natural regeneration of several infrequent and rare plant species and thus contribute towards the maintenance and in situ conservation of overall diversity of recurrently disturbed forest vegetation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ayyappan A. and Parthasarathy N. 1999. Biodiversity inventory of trees in a large scale permanent plot of tropical evergreen forest at Varagalaiar, Anamalais, Western Ghats, India. Biodiversity and Conservation 8: 1533–1554.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess R.L. 1978. Physiognomy and phytosociology of the international woodlands research sites. In: Reichle D.E. (ed.), Dynamic Properties of Forest Ecosystems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 1–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Champion H.G. and Seth S.K. 1968. General Silviculture for India. Publication Branch, Department of Printing and Stationary Government of India, Delhi, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandrashekara U.M. and Ramakrishnan P.S. 1994. Vegetation and gap dynamics of a tropical wet evergreen forest in the Western Ghats of Kerala, India. Journal of Tropical Ecology 10: 337–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniels R.J.R., Gadgil M. and Joshi N.V. 1995. Impact of human extraction on tropical humid forests in the Western Ghats in Uttara Kannada, South India. Journal of Applied Ecology 32: 866–874.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Angelis D.L., Gardner R.H. and O'Neill R.V. 1978. Productivity in Temperate Woodlands, CRC Handbook on Nutrition and Food. Chemical Rubber Co. Press, Cleveland, Ohio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engler A. and Prantl K. 1964. Syllabus der Pflanzenfamilien. 12th edn. Wilhelm Engelmann, Leipzig, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster R.B. 1980. Heterogeneity and disturbance in tropical vegetation. In: Soule' M.E. and Wilcox B.A. (eds), Conservation Biology: An Evolutionary¶Ecological Perspective. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts, pp. 75–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganesh T., Ganesan R., Devy M.S., Davidar P. and Bawa K.S. 1996. Assessment of plant biodiversity at a mid elevation evergreen forest of Kalakad-Mundanthurai Tiger Reserve, Western Ghats, India. Current Science 71: 379–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentry A.H. 1995. Diversity and floristic composition of neotropical dry forests. In: Bullock S.H., Mooney H.A. and Medina E. (eds), Seasonally Dry Tropical Forests. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 146–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grime J.P. 1998. Benefits of plant diversity to ecosystems: immediate, filter and founder effects. Journal of Ecology 86: 902–910.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta O.P. and Shukla R.P. 1991. The composition and dynamics of associated plant communities of sal plantations. Tropical Ecology 32: 296–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halpern C.B. and Spies T.A. 1995. Plant species diversity in natural and managed forests of the Pacific Northwest. Ecological Applications 5: 913–934.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jha C.S. and Singh J.S. 1990. Composition and dynamics of dry tropical forest in relation to soil texture. Journal of Vegetation Science 1: 609–614.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight D.H. 1975. A phytosociological analysis of species rich tropical forest on Barro Colorado Island, Panama. Ecological Monograph 45: 259–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magurran A.E. 1988. Ecological Diversity and Its Measurement. Croom Helm, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mori S.A., Boom B.M., Carbalho A.M. and Dos Santos T.S. 1983. Southern Bahain moist forest. Botanical Review 49: 155–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller-Dombois D. and Ellenberg H. 1974. Aims and Methods of Vegetation Ecology. John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murali K.S., Uma Shankar, Uma Shaanker R., Ganeshaiah K.N. and Bawa K.S. 1996. Extraction of non-timber forest products in the forests of Biligiri Rangan Hills, India. 2. Impact of NTFP extraction on regeneration, population structure, and species composition. Economic Botany 50: 252–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pande P.K. 1999. Comparative vegetation analysis and sal (Shorea robusta) regeneration in relation to their disturbance magnitude in some sal forests. Tropical Ecology 40: 51–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandey S.K. 2000. Population status and regeneration strategy of some perennial legumes in plantation forests of North-Eastern Uttar Pradesh, Ph.D. Thesis, DDU Gorakhpur University, Gorakhpur, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandey S.K. and Shukla R.P. 1999. Plant diversity and community patterns along the disturbance gradient in plantation forests of sal (Shorea robusta Gaertn). Current Science 77: 814–818.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandey S.K. and Shukla R.P. 2001. Regeneration strategy and plant diversity status in degraded sal forests. Current Science 81: 95–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimm S.L., Russell G.J., Gittleman J.L. and Brooks T.M. 1995. The future of biodiversity. Science 269: 347–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puyravaud J.P., Sridhar D., Gaulier A., Aravajy S. and Ramalingam R. 1995. Impact of fire on a dry deciduous forest in Bandipur National Park, Southern India: preliminary assessment and implications for management. Current Science 68: 745–751.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao P., Barik S.K., Pandey H.N. and Tripathi R.S. 1990. Community composition and tree population structure in a sub-tropical broadleaved forest along a disturbance gradient. Vegetatio 88: 151–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards P.W. 1952. The Tropical Rain Forest: An Ecological Study. Cambridge University Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rundel P.W. 1989. Ecological success in relation to plant form and function in the woody legumes. In: Stirton C.H. and Zarucchi J.L. (eds), Advances in Legume Biology. Monograph of Systemic Botany. Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis, Missouri, pp. 377–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shukla R.P. and Ramakrishnan P.S. 1986. Architecture and growth strategies of tropical trees in relation to successional status. Journal of Ecology 74: 33–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silvertown J.W. 1987. Introduction to Plant Population Ecology. 2nd edn. ELBS/Longman, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh A., Reddy V.S. and Singh J.S. 1995. Analysis of woody vegetation of Corbett National Park, India. Vegetatio 120: 69–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh J.S. and Singh S.P. 1987. Forest vegetation of the Himalaya. Botanical Review 53: 80–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava T.N. 1976. Flora Gorakhpurensis. Today and Tomorrow's Printers and Publishers, New Delhi, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sukumar R., Dattaraja H.S., Suresh H.S., Radhakrishnan J.V., Vasudeva R., Nirmala S. et al. 1992. Long term monitoring of vegetation in a tropical deciduous forest in Mudumalai, Southern India. Current Science 62: 608–616.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sukumar R., Suresh H.S., Dattaraja H.S. and Joshi N.V. 1998. Dynamics of a tropical deciduous forest: Population changes (1988 through 1993) in a 50-ha plot at Mudumalai, southern India. In: Dallmeier F. and Comiskey J.A. (eds), Forest Biodiversity Research, Monitoring and Modeling: Conceptual Background and Old World Case Studies. The Parthenon Publishing Group, Camforth, UK, pp. 529–540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uma Shankar 2001. A case of high tree diversity in a sal (Shorea robusta)-dominated lowland forest of Eastern Himalaya: floristic composition, regeneration and conservation. Current Science 81: 776–786.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uma Shankar, Lama S.D. and Bawa K.S. 1998. Ecosystem reconstruction through ‘taungya’ plantations following commercial logging of dry mixed deciduous forests in Darjeeling Himalaya. Forest Ecology and Management 102: 131–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Working Plan 1991¶1992. Working Plan of Gorakhpur Forest Division. Working Plan Circle, Nainital, India.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pandey, S., Shukla, R. Plant diversity in managed sal (Shorea robusta Gaertn.) forests of Gorakhpur, India: species composition, regeneration and conservation. Biodiversity and Conservation 12, 2295–2319 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024589230554

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024589230554

Navigation