Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of arsenate and phosphate on their accumulation by an arsenic-hyperaccumulator Pteris vittata L.

  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Arsenate and phosphate interactions are important for better understanding their uptake and accumulation by plant due to their similarities in chemical behaviors. The present study examined the effects of arsenate and phosphate on plant biomass and uptake of arsenate and phosphate by Chinese brake (Pteris vittata L.), a newly-discovered arsenic hyperaccumulator. The plants were grown for 20 weeks in a soil, which received the combinations of 670, 2670, or 5340 μmol kg−1 arsenate and 800, 1600, or 3200 μmol kg−1 phosphate, respectively. Interactions between arsenate and phosphate influenced their availability in the soil, and thus plant growth and uptake of arsenate and phosphate. At low and medium arsenate levels (670 and 2670 μmol kg−1), phosphate had slight effects on arsenate uptake by and growth of Chinese brake. However, phosphate substantially increased plant biomass and arsenate accumulation by alleviating arsenate phytotoxicity at high arsenate levels (5340 μmol kg−1). Moderate doses of arsenate increased plant phosphate uptake, but decreased phosphate concentrations at high doses because of its phytotoxicity. Based on our results, the minimum P/As molar ratios should be at least 1.2 in soil solution or 1.0 in fern fronds for the growth of Chinese brake. Our findings suggest that phosphate application may be an important strategy for efficient use of Chinese brake to phytoremediate arsenic contaminated soils. Further study is needed on the mechanisms of interactive effects of arsenate and phosphate on Chinese brake in hydroponic systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Asher C J and Reay P F 1979 Arsenic uptake by barley seedlings. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 6, 459–466.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beever R E and Burns D W J 1980 Phosphorus, uptake, storage and utilization by fungi. Adv. Bot. Res. 8, 127–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burlo F, Guijarro I, Barrachina A A C and Vlaero D 1999 Arsenic species: effects on and accumulation by tomato plants. J. Agric. Food Chem. 47, 1247–1253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carbonell A A, Aarabi M A, Delaune R D, Gambrell R P and Patrick W H Jr. 1998 Arsenic in wetland vegetation: Availability, phytotoxicity, uptake and effects on plant growth and nutrition. Sci. Total Environ. 217, 189–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creger T L and Peryea F J 1994 Phosphate fertilizer enhances arsenic uptake by apricot liners grown in lead-arsenic-enriched soil. Hortscience 29, 88–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day P R 1965 Pipette method of particle size analysis. In Methods of soil analysis. Part I., Ed C A Black. pp. 552–562. ASA, Madison, WI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon H B F 1997 The biochemical action of arsonic acids especially as phosphate analogues. In Advances in Inorganic Chemistry, Ed A G Sykes. pp. 191–228. Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao Y and Mucci A 2001 Acid base reactions, phosphate and arsenate complexation, and their competitive adsorption at the surface of goethite in 0.7 M NaCl solution. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 65, 2361–2378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurd-Karrer A M 1939 Antagonism of certain elements essential to plants toward chemically related toxic elements. Plant Physiol. 14, 9–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs L W and Keeney D R 1970 Arsenic-phosphorus interactions on corn. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 1, 85–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khattak R A, Page A L, Parker D R and Bakhtar D 1991 Accumulation and interactions of arsenic, selenium, molybdenum and phosphorus in alfalfa. J. Environ. Qual. 20, 165–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livesey N T and Huang P M 1981 Adsorption of arsenate by soils and its relation to selected chemical properties and anions. Soil Sci. 131, 88–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma L Q, Komar K M M, Tu C, Zhang W, Cai Y and Kennelley E D 2001 A fern that hyperaccumulates arsenic. Nature (London) 409, 579.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning B A and Goldberg S 1996 Modeling competitive adsorption of arsenate with phosphate and molybdate on oxide minerals. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 60, 121–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marschner H 1995 Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants. Academic Press Inc., London, UK. 889 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meharg A A and Macnair M R 1990 An altered phosphate uptake system in arsenate-tolerant Holcus lanatus L. New Phytol. 116, 29–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meharg A A and Macnair M R 1991 Uptake, accumulation and translocation of arsenate in arsenate-tolerant and non-tolerant Holcus lanatus L. New Phytol. 117, 225–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meharg A A, Naylor J and Macnair M R 1994 Phosphorus nutrition of arsenate-tolerant and nontolerant phenotypes of velvetgrass. J. Environ. Qual. 23, 234–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson D W and Sommers L E 1982 Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. In Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2, Eds A L Page, R H Miller and D R Keeney. pp. 539–579. Agron. Monogr. 9. ASA, Madison, WI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nieboer E, Padovan D and Lavoie P 1984 Anion accumulation by lichens. II. Competition and toxicity studies involving arsenate, phosphate, sulphate and sulphite. New Phytol. 96, 83–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickering I J, Prince R C, George M J, Smith R D, George G N and Salt D E 2000 Reduction and coordination of arsenic in Indian mustard. Plant Physiol. 122, 1171–1177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumberg C B, Engel R E and Meggitt W F 1960 Effect of phosphorus concentration on the absorption of arsenate by oats from nutrient solution. Agron. J. 52, 452–453.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute Inc., 1996. SAS/STAT User's Guide, V. 6.12. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silver S and Misra T K 1988 Plasmid-mediated heavy metal resistances. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 42, 717–743.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith E, Naidu R and Alston A M 2002 Chemistry of inorganic arsenic in soils: II. Effect of phosphorus, sodium, and calcium on arsenic sorption. J. Environ. Qual. 31, 557–563.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sneller F E C, L. M. Van Heerwaarden, Kraaijeveld-Smit F J, W. M. Ten Bookum, Koevoets P L M, Schat H and Verkleij J A C 1999 Toxicity of arsenate in Silene vulgaris, accumulation and degradation of arsenate-induced phytochelatins. New Phytol. 144, 223–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas G W 1982 Exchangeable cations. In Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2, Eds A L Page, R H Miller and D R Keeney. pp. 159–165. ASA, Madison, WI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tu C and Ma L Q 2002 Effects of arsenic concentrations and forms on arsenic uptake by the hyperaccumulator ladder brake. J. Environ. Qual. 31, 641–647.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh L M and Keeney D R 1975 Behavior and phytotoxicity of inorganic arsenicals in soils. In Arsenical Pesticides, Ed E A Woolson. pp. 35–52. ACS, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells J M and Richardson D H S 1985 Anion accumulation by the moss Hylocomium splendens: uptake and competition studies involving arsenate, selenate, selenite, phosphate, sulphate and sulphite. New Phytol. 101, 571–583.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolson E A, Axley J H and Kearney P C 1973 The chemistry and phytotoxicity of arsenic in soils: II. Effects of time and phosphorus. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 37, 254–259.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cong Tu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tu, C., Ma, L.Q. Effects of arsenate and phosphate on their accumulation by an arsenic-hyperaccumulator Pteris vittata L.. Plant and Soil 249, 373–382 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022837217092

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022837217092

Navigation