Abstract
Natural peatlands represent a long-termsink of atmospheric carbon dioxide(CO2), however, drained and extractedpeatlands can represent a source ofatmospheric CO2. The restoration ofSphagnum mosses on abandoned milledpeatlands has the potential to sequesteratmospheric CO2 thereby returning thepeatland to a peat accumulating system.Micrometeorological and chambermeasurements of net ecosystem CO2exchange are proven methods forinvestigating production and decompositionprocesses in both natural, extracted, andrestored peatlands. However, this approachis relatively expensive because ofinfrastructure and human resources that notonly limits potential use for ecologicalmanagers but it limits the number of sitesthat can be monitored due to high spatialvariability. Here we present crank wire anddestructive sampling productionmeasurements, litter bag decompositionmeasurements and measurements of netecosystem CO2 exchange made in arestored peatland and natural peatlandsites nearby. The objectives were to assessproduction and decomposition rates in thetwo systems as well as to compare thedifferent measurements techniques.Estimates of Sphagnum fuscumproduction at a restored peatland, usingthe different methods, followed the trend:crank wire < destructive sampling < gasexchange, with the two last methodsproviding comparable estimates. Productionestimates using crank wires in cutover peatsurfaces with a thin newly formed Sphagnum mat were shown unreliable due topeat subsidence. Results using thedestructive sampling method suggest thatSphagnum production varies betweenspecies (S. fuscum > S.capillifolium) according to their abilityto withstand harsh conditions on restoredpeat surfaces. Decomposition rate was alsosignificantly greater (p<0.05) for S. capillifolium than S. fuscum,resulting in an overall plant accumulationgreater for S. fuscum. Although therestored surfaces were fairly young,production rates estimated on cutoversurfaces that were fully covered with athin Sphagnum mat compared withproduction rates observed in natural sitesnearby.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Campeau, S. and Rochefort, L. 1996. Sphagnum regeneration on bare peat surfaces: field and greenhouse experiments. J. Appl. Ecol. 33: 599–608.
Campeau, S. and Rochefort, L. 2000. Production rate and water content of Sphagnum on restored cutover peatlands: comparison with natural areas. In: Rochefort, L. and Daigle, J.-Y. (eds.), Sustaining our Peatlands. Proc. 11th International Peat Congress. Québec City, Canada. August 6–12, 2000. Vol. II. pp. 727–730. Canadian Society of Peat and Peatlands and International Peat Society, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Clymo, R.S. 1965. Experiments on breakdown of Sphagnum in two bogs. J. Ecology 53: 747–757.
Clymo, R.S. 1970. The growth of Sphagnum: methods of measurement. J. Ecology 58: 13–49.
Crum, H.A. 1988. A Focus on Peatlands and Peat Mosses. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Environment Canada. 1993. Canadian Climate Normals, 1961– 1990: Québec. Atmospheric Environment Service, Canadian Climate Program, Environment Canada, Ottawa, Canada.
Gerdol, R. 1995. The growth dynamics of Sphagnum based on field measurements in a temperate bog and on laboratory cultures. J. Ecology 83: 431–437.
Gorham, E. 1991. Northern peatlands: role in the carbon cycle and probable responses to climatic warming. Ecol. Appl. 1: 182–195.
Gorham, E. (this issue). Peatland restoration: a brief review with special reference to Sphagnum bogs. Wetl. Ecol. & Manag.
Grigal, D.F. 1985. Sphagnum production in forested bogs of northern Minnesota. Can. J. Botany 63: 1204–1207.
Hobbs, R.J. and Norton, D.A. 1996. Toward a conceptual framework for restoration ecology. Rest. Ecology 4: 93–110.
Ilomets, M.A. 1981. Prirosti produktivnost' sfagnovogo pokrova v jugo-zapadnoj Estonii. Botanicheskii Zhurnal 66: 279–290.
Johnson, L.C. and Damman, A.W.H. 1991. Species controlled Sphagnum decay on a south Swedish raised bog. Oikos 61: 234–242.
Johnson, L.C. and Damman, A.W. 1993. Decay and its regulation in Sphagnum peatlands. Adv. in Bryol. 5: 249–296.
Johnson, K.W., Maly, C.C. and Malterer, T.J. 2000. Effects of mulch, companion species, and planting time on restoration of post-harvested Minnesota peatlands, U.S.A. In: Rochefort, L. and Daigle, J.-Y. (eds.), Sustaining our Peatlands. Proc. 11th Int. Peat Congress. Québec City, Canada. August 6–12, 2000. Vol. II. pp. 699–704. Canadian Society of Peat and Peatlands and International Peat Society, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Kuhry, P., Nicholson, B.J., Gignac, L.D., Vitt, D.H. and Bayley, S.E. 1993. Development of Sphagnum-dominated peatlands in boreal continental Canada. Can. J. Botany 71: 10–22.
Lindholm, T. and Vasander, H. 1990. Production of eight species of Sphagnum at Suurisuo mire, southern Finland. Annales Botanici Fennici 27: 145–157.
Matthews, E. and Fung, I.Y. 1987. Methane emissions from natural wetlands: Global distribution, area, and environmental characteristics of sources. Gl. Biogeochem. Cycl. 1: 61–86.
McNeil, P. 2001. Limits to Sphagnum Growth on a Cutover Peatland. M.Sc. thesis, School of Geography and Geology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario.
Milliken, G.A. and Johnson, D.E. 1989. Analysis of Messy Data. Volume 1 – Designed experiments. Van Nostrand Reinhold Company Inc., New York, USA. 473 pp.
Moore, T.R. 1989. Plant production, decomposition and carbon efflux in a subarctic patterned fen. Arct. Alp. Res. 21: 156–162.
Petrone, R.M., Price, J.S. and Waddington, J.M. 2001. Evapotranspiration and net ecosystem CO2 exchange in a restored vacuum extracted peatland, Québec. Hydrol. Proc. 15: 2839–2845.
Price, J.S. 1996. Hydrology and microclimate of a partly restored cutover bog, Quebec. Hydrol. Proc. 10: 1263–1272.
Price, J.S. 1997. Soil moisture, water tension, and water table relationships in a managed cutover bog. J. Hydrol. 202: 21–32.
Price, J.S. 1998. Methods for restoration of a cutover peatland, Québec, Canada. In: Malterer, T., Johnson, K. and Stewart, J. (eds.), Peatland Restoration and Reclamation. Proc. 1998 Int. Peat Symp. pp. 149–154. International Peat Society, Duluth, Minnesota, USA.
Price, J.S., Rochefort, L. and Quinty, F. 1998. Energy and moisture considerations on cutover peatlands: surface microtopography, mulch cover and Sphagnum regeneration. Ecol. Eng. 10: 293– 312.
Price, J.S., Heathwaite, A.L. and Baird, A.J. (this issue). Hydrology of peatland restoration. Wetl. Ecol. & Manag.
Price, J.S., Rochefort, L. and Campeau, S. (in press) On the use of shallow basins to restore cutover peatlands: Hydrology. Rest. Ecol.
Quinty, F. and Rochefort, L. 1997. Peatland Restoration Guide. Canadian Sphagnum Peat Moss Association. Université Laval, Faculté des sciences de l'agriculture et de l'alimentation, Sainte-Foy, Québec, Canada. 21 pp.
Rochefort, L., 2000. Sphagnum – A keystone genus in habitat restoration. The Bryologist 103: 503–508.
Rochefort, L. 2001. Restauration écologique. In: Payette, S. and Rochefort, L. (eds.), Écologie des tourbières du Québec-Labrador. pp. 449–504. Les Presses de l'Université Laval, Sainte-Foy, Québec, Canada.
Rochefort, L., Gauthier, R. and LeQuéré, D. 1995. Sphagnum regeneration – Toward an optimisation of bog restoration. In:Wheeler, B.D., Shaw, S.C., Fojt, W.J. and Robertson, R.A. (eds.), Restoration of Temperate Wetlands. pp. 423–434. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Sheffield, UK.
Rochefort, L., Vitt, D.H. and Bayley, S.E. 1990. Growth, production and decomposition dynamics ofSphagnum under natural and experimentally acidified conditions. Ecology 71: 1986–2000.
Rochefort, L., Quinty, F., Campeau, S., Vitt, D.H., Johnson, K.W. and Malterer, T.J. (this issue) North American approach to peatland restoration. Wetl. Ecol. & Manag.
Tuittila, E.-S., Komulainen, V.-M., Vasander, H. and Laine, J. 1999. Restored cut-away peatland as a sink for atmospheric CO2. Oecologia 120: 563–574.
Waddington, J.M. and Warner, K.D. 2001. Atmospheric CO2 sequestration in restored mined peatlands. Ecoscience 8: 359–368.
Waddington, J.M., Warner, K.D. and Kennedy, G. (in press) Cutover peatlands: A persistent source of atmospheric CO2. Gl. Biogeochem. Cycles.
Wieder, R.K. and Lang, G.E. 1983. Net primary production of the dominant bryophytes in a Sphagnum-dominated wetland in West Virginia. The Bryologist 86: 280–286.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Waddington, J., Rochefort, L. & Campeau, S. Sphagnum production and decomposition in a restored cutover peatland. Wetlands Ecology and Management 11, 85–95 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022009621693
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022009621693