Skip to main content
Log in

Assessing Hostile Automatic Thoughts: Development and Validation of the HAT Scale

  • Published:
Cognitive Therapy and Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Similar to the measurement of automatic thoughts in depressed persons (Hollon & Kendall, 1980), the Hostile Automatic Thoughts (HAT) Scale was developed and validated as a 30-item self-report index. Comprised of three components, the HAT Scale reflects recurring hostile thoughts that involve physical aggression (11 items), derogation (10 items), and revenge (9 items) toward other people. In a first study, the procurement of an item pool reflecting a full array of hostile thoughts is described, along with exploratory factor analysis, item selection, internal reliability, and convergent and discriminant validation information. In a second cross-validational study, the factor structure is substantiated via confirmatory factor analyses, as is the internal reliability, and the convergent and discriminant validity. The findings related to the HAT Scale are reviewed, including its use as a state, trait, or situation-specific index.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Allred, K. D., & Smith, T. W. (1991). Social cognition in cynical hostility. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 15, 399–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barefoot, J. C. (1992). Developments in the measurement of hostility. In H. S. Friedman (Ed.), Hostility, coping, and health (pp. 13–31). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barefoot, J. C., Dodge, K. A., Peterson, B. L., Dahlstrom, W. G., & Williams, Jr., R. B. (1989). Cook-Medley Hostility Scale: Item content and ability to predict survival. Psychosomatic Medicine, 51, 46–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barefoot, J. C., & Lipkus, I. M. (1994). The assessment of anger and hostility. In A. W. Siegman & T. W. Smith (Eds.), Anger, hostility and heart (pp. 43–66). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barefoot, J. C., & Schroll, M. (1996). Symptoms of depression, acute myocardial infarction, and total mortality in a community sample. Circulation, 93, 1976–1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Garbin, M. G. (1988). Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory: Twenty-five years of evaluation. Clinical Psychology Review, 8, 77–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T., Ward, C. H., Mendelsohn, M., Mock, J., & Erbaugh, J. (1961). An inventory for measuring depression. Archives of General Psychiatry, 4, 53–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bushman, B. J., Cooper, H. M., & Lemke, K. M. (1991). Meta-analysis of factor analyses: An illustration of the Buss-Durkee Hostility Inventory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 344–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, A. H. (1961). The psychology of aggression. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, A. H., & Durkee, A. (1957). An inventory for assessing different kinds of hostility. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 21, 343–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Contrada, R. J., & Jussim, L. (1992). What does the Cook-Medley Hostility Scale measure? In search of an adequate measurement model. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22, 614–627.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, W. W., & Medley, D. M. (1954). Proposed Hostility and Pharisaic-Virtue scales for the MMPI. Journal of Applied Psychology, 38, 414–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa, Jr., P. T., McCrae, R. R., & Dembrowski, T. M. (1989). Agreeableness vs. antagonism: Explication of a potential risk for CHD. In A. W. Siegman & T. M. Dembroski (Eds.), In search of coronary-prone behavior (pp. 41–64). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dembrowski, T. M., & MacDougall, J. M. (1985). Beyond global Type A: Relationships of paralinguistic attributes, hostility, and anger-in to coronary heart disease. In T. Field, P. McCabe, & N. Schneiderman (Eds.), Stress and coping (pp. 223–241). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dembrowski, T. M., MacDougall, J. M., Williams, R. B., Haney, T. L., & Blumenthal, J. A. (1985). Components of Type A, hostility, and anger-in: Relationship to angiographic findings. Psychosomatic Medicine, 47, 219–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eaker, E. D., Pinsky, J., & Castelli, W. P. (1992). Myocardial infarction and coronary death among women: Psychosocial predictors for a 20-year follow-up of women in the Framingham study. American Journal of Epidemiology, 185, 854–864.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser-Smith, N., Lespérance, F., & Talajic, M. (1995). The impact of negative emotions on prognosis following myocardial infarction: Is it more than depression? Health Psychology, 14, 388–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M., & Rosenman, R. H. (1959). Association of specific overt behavior pattern with blood and cardiovascular findings. Journal of the American Medical Association, 169, 1286–1296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M., & Rosenman, R. H. (1974). Type A behavior and your heart. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). Factor analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hathaway, S. R., & McKinley, J. C. (1967). Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory: Manual for administration and scoring. New York: Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollon, S. D., & Kendall, P. C. (1980). Cognitive self-statements in depression: Development of an automatic thoughts questionnaire. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 4, 383–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houston, B. K., & Snyder, C. R. (Eds.) (1988). Type A behavior pattern: Research, theory, and intervention. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houston, B. K., & Vavak, C. (1991). Hostility: Developmental factors, psychosocial correlates, and health behaviors. Health Psychology, 10, 9–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingram, R. E., & Wisnicki, K. S. (1988). Assessment of positive automatic cognition. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 898–902.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendall, P. C., Williams, L., Pechacek, T. F., Graham, L. E., Shesslak, C., & Herzoff, N. (1979). Cognitive-behavioral and patient education interventions in cardiac catheterization procedures: The Palo Alto medical psychology project. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 47, 49–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, K. A. (1988). Coronary heart disease and Type A behaviors: Update on and alternative to the Booth-Kewley and Friedman (1987) quantitative review. Psychological Bulletin, 104, 373–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayou, R. (1989). Invited review: Atypical chest pain. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 33, 393–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R. R., & Costa, Jr., P. T. (1983). Social desirability scales: More substance than style. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, 882–888.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, T. Q., Smith, T. W., Turner, C. W., Guijarro, M. L., & Hallet, A. J. (1996). A meta-analytic review of research on hostility and physical health. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 322–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, J. G., Licht, B. G., & Pearl, R. A. (1982). Some dangers of using personality questionnaires to study personality. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 572–580.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pope, M. K., Smith, T. W., & Rhodewalt, F. (1990). Cognitive, behavioral, and affective correlates of the Cook and Medley Hostility scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 54, 501–514.

    Google Scholar 

  • Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (1994). Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis. In A. von Eye & C. C. Clogg (Eds.), Latent variable analysis: Applications for developmental research (pp. 399–419). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, R. M., & Gottman, J. M. (1976). Toward a task analysis of assertive behavior. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 44, 910–920.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shekelle, R. B., Vernon, S. W., & Ostfeld, A. M. (1991). Personality and coronary heart disease. Psychosomatic Medicine, 53, 176–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegman, A. W., Dembrowski, T. M., & Ringel, N. (1987). Components of hostility and severity of coronary artery disease. Psychosomatic Medicine, 48, 127–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegman, A. W., & Smith, T. W. (Eds.). (1994). Anger, hostility and the heart. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, T. W. (1992). Hostility and health: Current status of a psychosomatic hypothesis. Health Psychology, 11, 139–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, T. W. (1994). Concepts and methods in the study of anger, hostility and health. In A. W. Siegman & T. W. Smith (Eds.), Anger, hostility and heart (pp. 23–42). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, T. W. (1995). Assessment and modification of coronary-prone behavior: A transactional view of the person in social context. In A. J. Goreczny (Ed.), Handbook of health and rehabilitation psychology (pp. 197–217). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, T. W., & Frohm, K. D. (1985). What's so unhealthy about hostility? Construct validity and psychosocial correlates of the Cook and Medley Ho scale. Health Psychology, 4, 503–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, T. W., & Pope, M. K. (1990). Cynical hostility as a health risk: Current status and future directions. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 5, 77–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, T. W., Sanders, J. D., & Alexander, J. F. (1990). What does the Cook and Medley Hostility Scale measure? Affect, behavior, and attributions in the marital context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 699–708.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., & Luchene, R. E. (1970). Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnik, B. G., & Videll, L. S. (1989). Using multivariate statistics. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (1988). Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 193–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (1994). Positive illusions and well-being: Separating fact from fiction. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 21–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegin, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R., & Williams, V. (1993). Anger kills. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Snyder, C.R., Crowson, J.J., Houston, B.K. et al. Assessing Hostile Automatic Thoughts: Development and Validation of the HAT Scale. Cognitive Therapy and Research 21, 477–492 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021988511695

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021988511695

Navigation