Abstract
Eucalyptus camaldulensis Dehnh. is a moderately salt-tolerant Australian tree species widely used in farm forestry, often in salt-affected landscapes. In a glasshouse experiment, E. camaldulensis seedlings from 15 wide-ranging Australian seed sources (provenances), were cultured in sand-filled pots and treated for 57 days with control (no added NaCl in tap water, neutral pH), saline (150 mol m−3 NaCl, stepped high pH (pH 7.6 to 9.5) and combined NaCl and high pH solutions. Significant differences were found among provenances in height and shoot dry weight. Differences in provenance response to treatment were found for dry weight but not for height. Reductions in shoot dry weight due to NaCl and high pH ranged from 42.9% to 82.0% and 4.3% to 51.7% respectively. Provenances from Lake Hindmarsh-SE (Victoria) and Lake Albacutya-N (Victoria) had relatively high tolerance to both stresses whereas those from Lake Albacutya-S (Victoria), Lowan Valley (Victoria), Silverton (New South Wales) and Katherine (Northern Territory) had low tolerance to both stresses. Provenances from De Grey River and Fitzroy River (Western Australia) were most tolerant of high pH. The performance of these provenances in this experiment generally accorded well with that in saline field environments.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arnold R., Harwood C., Matheson C. and Spencer D. 2000. Choice of species and opportunities for genetic improvement. In: Nambiar S., Cromer R. and Brown A. (eds), Restoring Tree Cover to the Murray-Darling Basin. CSIRO Forestry and Forest Products, Canberra, pp. 13–20.
Aswathappa N., Marcar N.E. and Thomson L.A.J. 1987. Salt tolerance of Australian tropical and subtropical acacias. In: Turnbull J.W. (ed.), Australian Acacias in Developing Countries. ACIAR Proceedings No. 16. ACIAR, Canberra, pp. 70–73.
Bell D.T., Wilkins C.F., van der Moezel P.G. and Ward S.C. 1993. Alkalinity tolerance of woody species used in bauxite waste rehabilitation, Western Australia. Restor. Ecol. 51–58.
Bennett D.L. and George R.J. 1996. River red gums (E. camaldulensis) for farm forestry on saline and waterlogged land in south-western catchments of Western Australia? Proceedings of 4th National Conference and Workshop on the 'Productive Use and Rehabilitation of Saline Lands', Albany, Western Australia, 25–30 March 1996. Promaco Conventions Pty Ltd., Canning Bridge, WA, Australia, pp. 345–358.
Dudal R. and Purnell M.F. 1986. Land resources: salt affected soils. Reclam. Reveg. Res. 5: 1–10.
Eldridge K.G., Davidson J., Harwood C.E. and Van Wyk G. 1993. Eucalypt Domestication and Breeding. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 288 p.
Emery B.M. and Ledig F.T. 1987. Provenance variation in Eucalyptus camaldulensis Dehnh. in California. Silvae Genetica 36: 172–180.
Mahmood K., Marcar N.E., Naqvi M.H., Arnold R.J., Crawford D.F., Iqbal S. et al. 2002. Genetic 206 variation in Eucalyptus camaldulensis Dehnh. for growth and stem straightness in a provenancefamily trial on saltland in Pakistan. Forest Ecology and Management (in press).
Marcar N.E. 1993. Waterlogging modifies growth, water use and ion concentrations in seedlings of salt-treated Eucalyptus camaldulensis, E. tereticornis, E. robusta and E. globulus. Aust. J. Plant Physiol 20: 1–13.
Marcar N.E. and Termaat A. 1990. Effects of root-zone solutes in Eucalyptus camaldulensis and Eucalyptus bicostata seedlings: responses to Na+, Mg2+ and Cl-. Plant Soil 125: 245–254.
Marcar N.E. and Khanna P.K. 1997. Reforestation of salt-affected and acid soils. In: Nambiar E.K.S. and Brown A.G. (eds), Management of Soil, Nutrients and Water in Tropical Plantation Forests. ACIAR Monograph No. 43. Canberra, Australia, pp. 481–524.
Marcar N.E., Crawford D.F., Leppert P.M., Jovanovic T., Floyd R. and Farrow R. 1995. Trees for Saltland: A Guide to Selecting Native Species for Australia. CSIRO Publications, Melbourne, 72 p.
Marcar N.E. and Arnold R.J. 1999. Selection and improvement of eucalypts and acacias for salt and waterlogging tolerance. In: Arain M.A., Ahmad M., Naqvi S.S.M. and Ashraf M. (eds), New Genetical Approaches to Crop Improvement. Third International Symposium. Tando Jam, Pakistan, pp. 217–230.
Marcar N.E., Guo J. and Crawford D.F. 1999. Response of Eucalyptus camaldulensis Dehnh, E. globulus Labill. ssp. globulus and E. grandis W. Hill to excess boron and sodium chloride. Plant Soil 208: 251–257.
Marschner H. 1995. Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants. 2nd edn. Academic Press, London, 889 p.
Midgley S.J., Eldridge K.G. and Doran J.C. 1989. Genetic resources of Eucalyptus camaldulensis. Common. For. Rev. 68: 295–308.
Payne R.W., Lane P.W., Ainsley A.E., Bicknell K.E., Digby P.G.N., Harding S.A. et al. 1987. Genstat 5 Reference Manual. Oxford University Press, New York, 749 p.
Qureshi R.H. and Barrett-Lennard E.G. 1998. Saline Agriculture for Irrigated Land in Pakistan: a Handbook. ACIAR, Canberra, 142 p.
Sands R. 1981. Salt resistance in Eucalyptus camaldulensis Dehn. from three different seed sources. Aust. For. Res. 11: 93–100.
Thomson L.A.J., Morris J.D. and Halloran G.M. 1987. Salt tolerance in eucalypts. In: Rana R.S. (ed.), Afforestation of Salt-Affected Soils. Proceedings International Symposium,Volume 3. Central Soil Salinity Research Institute, Karnal, India 3:, pp. 1–12.
van der Moezel P.G., Watson L.E. and Bell D.T. 1989. Gas exchange responses of two Eucalyptus species to salinity and waterlogging. Tree Physiol 5: 251–257.
White P.F. and Robson A.D. 1990. Response of lupins (Lupinus angustifolius L.) and peas (Pisum 2 sativum L.) to Fe deficiency induced by low concentrations of Fe in solution or by addition of HCO -3 . Plant Soil 125: 39–47.
Zohar Y. and Schiller G. 1998. Growth and water use by selected seed sources of Eucalyptus under high water table and saline conditions. Agric. Ecosys. Environ 69: 265–277.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Marcar, N.E., Zohar, Y., Guo, J. et al. Effect of NaCl and high pH on seedling growth of 15 Eucalyptus camaldulensis Dehnh. provenances. New Forests 23, 193–206 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020334418883
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020334418883