Skip to main content
Log in

Phylloplane fungi: an extrinsic factor of tetranychid population growth?

  • Published:
Experimental & Applied Acarology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In a study on leaf-inhabiting tetranychid mites (Tetranychus urticae Koch–TSSM and Panonychus ulmi (Koch)–ERM) we investigated the effects of an extrinsic factor on the mites environment, namely phylloplane fungi. In a research orchard four trees were selected and treated with an aerosol application of a phylloplane fungus (Alternaria alternata) in a tap-water emulsion. Applications were made immediately after each sampling, with the exception of the last sample date. Two tap water controls for each treated tree were also sampled: a nearest neighbour (< 3 m from the treated trees) and a distant neighbour (> 30 m from the treated trees with other apple trees in between). Due to possible migration from the treated trees to near neighbours, the distant control best reflected normal orchard conditions. Eight samples were taken throughout the 1994 growing season; however, appreciable mite populations were only observed on the last four sample dates. On the treated trees, the ERM maintained a steady low population (less than ten per leaf) whereas the TSSM showed a population outbreak (up to 44 mites per leaf). Conversely, on the distant trees, the TSSM maintained a low population (less than ten per leaf) while the ERM showed an outbreak (up to 33 per leaf). Observing on a leaf by leaf basis, when tetranychids were present on a leaf, either one species dominated or the other, suggesting mutual competitive exclusion, the outcome of which was reversed to favour TSSM on trees that received an application of fungus. We concluded that the application of additional or supplemental amounts of A. alternata to apple leaves enhanced the population growth of TSSM compared to that of ERM. Possible mechanisms are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Andrews, J.H. and Kenerley, C.M. 1978. The effects of a pesticide program on non-target epiphytic microbial populations of apple leaves. Can. J. Microbiol. 24: 1058–1072.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bernays, E. and Chapman, R. 1987. The evolution of deterrent responses in plant-feeding insects. In Perspectives in chemoreception and behaviour, R.F. Chapman, E.A. Bernays and J.G. Stoffolano, Jr. (eds), pp. 143–157. Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bower, K.N., Berkett, L.P. and Constante, J.F. 1995. Nontarget effect of a fungicide spray program on phytophagous and predacious mite populations in a scab-resistant apple orchard. Environ. Entomol. 24: 423–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, G. 1988. Fungal endophytes in stems and leaves: from latent pathogen to mutualistic symbiont. Ecology 69: 2–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colquhoun, D. 1971. Lectures on Biostatistics, pp. 125–127. Clarendon Press, Oxford, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagley, E.A.C. and Biggs, A.R. 1989. Effects of three fungicides on populations of a phytophagous and several predacious mites (Acarina) on apple. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 6: 253–256.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jermy, T. 1987. The role of experience in the host selection of phytophagous insects. In Perspectives in chemoreception and behaviour, R.F. Chapman, E.A. Bernays and J.G. Stoffolano, Jr. (Eds), pp. 143–157. Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jermy, T., Bernays, E.A. and Szentesi, A. 1982. The effect of repeated exposure to feeding deterrents on their acceptability to phytophagous insects. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium on Insect-Plant Relationships, J.H. Visser and A.K. Minks (eds), pp. 25–32. Pudoc, Wageningen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karban, R., Adamchak, R. and Schnathorst, W.C. 1987. Induced resistance and interspecific competition between spider mites and a vascular wilt fungus. Science 235: 678–680.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kolmes, S.A., Dennehy, T.J. and Sam Y. 1992. Induced feeding preferences in dicifol-resistant two-spotted spider mite (Acari: Tetranychidae). Exp. Appl. Acarol. 14: 107–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langseth, W., Hoie, R. and Gullord, M. 1995. The influence of cultivars, location and climate on deoxynivalenol contamination in Norwegian oats 1985–1990. Acta Agricult. Scand. Sect. B Soil Plant Sci. 45: 63–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J.D., Strongman, D. and Whitney, N.J. 1985. Observations of fungi associated with spruce budworm-infested balsam fir needles. Can. J. Forest. Res. 15: 896–901.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newcomer, E.S. and Yothers, M.A. 1929. Biology of the European red mite in the Pacific northwest. Tech. Bull. US Dep. Agricult. 89: 1–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robiglio, A.L. and Lopez, S.E., 1995. Mycotoxin production by Alternaria alternata strains isolated from red delicious apples in Argentina. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 24: 413–417.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R.R. and Rohlf, J.R. 1995. Biometry, 3rd ed, pp. 272–319. W. H. Freeman & Co., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szentesi, A. and Bernays, E.A. 1984. A study of behavioral habituation to a feeding deterrent in nymphs of Schistocerca gregaria. Physiol. Entomol. 9: 329–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolhouse, M.E.J. and Harmsen, R. 1984. The mite complex on the foliage of a pesticide-free apple orchard: population dynamics and habitat preferences. Proc. Entomol. Soc. Ont. 115: 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Belczewski, R., Harmsen, R. Phylloplane fungi: an extrinsic factor of tetranychid population growth?. Exp Appl Acarol 21, 463–471 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018483929822

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018483929822

Navigation