Skip to main content
Log in

Using patterns of distribution and diversity of Kenyan birds to select and prioritize areas for conservation

  • Published:
Biodiversity & Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Patterns and environmental correlates of species distributions and richness are identified for Kenyan birds at a quarter degree-square scale. This information is used together with iterative complementarity analyses, which employ species richness, taxonomic dispersion and range-restrictedness, to identify priority areas for possible conservation attention. Bird species apparently not conserved by existing protected areas in Kenya are identified. Six avifaunal zones (and one transitional zone) are distinguished based on distributions of suites of bird species. Variation in biotope diversity (the number of forest and aquatic systems) accounts for 79% of the observed variation in Kenyan bird species richness. Although both rainfall and altitudinal range are significantly correlated with species richness, they only explain an additional 3% of the observed variation. The priority areas identified are situated mainly within highlands and coastal lowlands. Although few priority areas are identified in northern Kenya, this region also constitutes a priority, as it contains a suite of xeric species with habitats that are not represented elsewhere in Kenya. The papyrus yellow warbler, Chloropeta gracilirostris, William's bush lark, Mirafra williamsi, white-winged dove, Streptopelia reichenowi, and Jubaland weaver, Ploceus dichrocephalus, are identified as endemics or near-endemics that are probably not adequately conserved in Kenya at present.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Begon, M., Harper, J.L. and Townsend, C.R. (1990) Ecology: Individuals, Populations and Communities. London: Blackwell Scientific Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Britton, P.L. (ed.) (1980) Birds of East Africa; their Habitat, Status and Distribution. Nairobi: East Africa Natural History Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowe, T.M. and Crowe, A.A. (1982) Patterns of distribution, diversity and endemism in Afrotropical birds. J. Zool. Lond. 198, 417–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowe, T.M. and Crowe, A.A. (1985) The genus Francolinus as a model for avian evolution and biogeography in Africa: I. relationships among species. In Proc. Int. Symp. Afr. Vert. (K.L. Schuchmann, ed.) pp. 207–231. Bonn: Museum Alexander Koenig.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowe, T.M. and Brooke, R.K. (1993) A review: Putting biodiversity on the map: priority areas for global conservation. Ostrich 64, 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean, W.R.J. and Hockey, P.A.R. (1989) An ecological perspective of lark (Alaudidae) distribution and diversity in the southwest arid zone of Africa. Ostrich 6, 27–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, W.J. (ed.) (1990) BMDP Statistical Software. Los Angeles, California: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faith, D.P. (1994) Phylogenetic diversity: a general framework for the prediction of feature diversity. In Systematics and Conservation Evaluation (P.L. Forey, C.J. Humphries and R.I. Vane-Wright, eds) pp. 327–50. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fanshawe, J.H. and Bennun, L.A. (1991) Bird conservation in Kenya: creating a national strategy. Bird Conserv. Intern. 1, 293–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guillet, A. and Crowe, T.M. (1986) A preliminary investigation of patterns of distribution and species richness of southern African waterbirds. S. Afr. J. Wildl. Res. 16, 65–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • ICBP (1992) Putting Biodiversity on the Map: Priority Areas for Global Conservation. Cambridge: ICBP.

    Google Scholar 

  • IUCN/UNEP (1987) The IUCN Directory of Afrotropical Protected Areas. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kershaw, M., Williams, P.H. and Mace, G.M. (1994) Conservation of Afrotropical antelopes: consequences and efficiency of using different site selection methods and diversity criteria. Biodivers. Conserv. 3, 354–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, J.B. (1983) An iterative method for establishing priorities for the selection of nature reserves: an example from Tasmania. Biol. Conserv. 25, 127–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, A. and Pomeroy, D. (1989) A Bird Atlas of Kenya. Rotterdam: Balkema.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mainguet, M. (1991) Desertification: Natural Background and Human Mismanagement. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margules, C.R. and Usher, M.B. (1981) Criteria used in assessing wildlife conservation potential: a review. Biol. Conserv. 21, 79–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margules, C.R., Nicholls, A.O. and Pressey, R.L. (1988) Selecting networks of reserves to maximize biological diversity. Biol. Conserv. 43, 63–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margules, C.R., Cresswell, I.D. and Nicholls, A.O. (1994) A scientific basis for establishing networks of protected areas. In Systematics and Conservation Evaluation (P.L. Forey, C.J. Humphries and R.I. Vane-Wright, eds) pp. 327–50. Oxford: Clarendon Press

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeely, J.A. (1988) Economics and Biological Diversity: Developing and Using Economic Incentives to Conserve Biological Resources. pp. 1–18. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pomeroy, D. and Lewis, A. (1987) Bird species richness in tropical Africa: some comparisons. Biol. Conserv. 40, 11–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pressey, R.L., Bedward, M and Keith, D.A. (1994) New procedures for reserve selection in New South Wales: maximizing the chances of achieving a representative network. In Systematics and Conservation Evaluation (P.L. Forey, C.J. Humphries and R.I. Vane-Wright, eds) pp. 351–74. Oxford: Clarendon Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Sibley, C.G. and Monroe, B.L. (1990) Distribution and Taxonomy of Birds of the World. New Haven, USA: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • SURFER (1989) Version 4.14. Golden, Colorado: Golden Software Inc.

  • Turpie, J.K. and Crowe, T.M. (1994) Patterns of distribution, diversity and endemism of larger African mammals. S. Afr. J. Zool. 29, 19–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNEP (1992) The Convention on Biological Diversity. Washington, DC: UNEP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vane-Wright, R.I., Humphries, C.J. and Williams P.J. (1991) What to protect? Systematics and the agony of choice. Biol. Conserv. 55, 235–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vane-Wright, R.I., Smith, C.R. and Kitching, I.J. (1994) Systematic assessment of taxic diversity by summation. In Systematics and Conservation Evaluation (P.L. Forey, C.J. Humphries and R.I. Vane-Wright, eds.) pp. 230–326. Oxford: Clarendon Press

    Google Scholar 

  • WCMC (1994) Digital database of Afrotropical protected areas. Cambridge, UK: WCMC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, P.H., Vane-Wright, R.I. and Humphries, C.J. (1991) Measuring biodiversity for choosing conservation areas. Hymenoptera & Biodiversity Volume (Sheffield) 15 VIII, 1–24.

  • Williams, P.H. (1993) Using WORLDMAP: Priority Areas for Biodiversity version 3.06. London: The Natural History Museum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, P.H. and Humphries, C.J. (1994) Biodiversity, taxonomic relatedness, and endemism in conservation. In Systematics and Conservation Evaluation (P.L. Forey, C.J. Humphries and R.I. Vane-Wright, eds) pp. 269–88. Oxford: Clarendon Press

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Muriuki, J.N., Klerk, H.M.D., Williams, P.H. et al. Using patterns of distribution and diversity of Kenyan birds to select and prioritize areas for conservation. Biodiversity and Conservation 6, 191–210 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018340002756

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018340002756

Navigation