Skip to main content
Log in

Breeding winter wheat for a dual-purpose management system

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Breeders attempt to conduct selection under environmental conditionsrepresentative of the target environment. In the U.S. southern Great Plains,more than 50% of the wheat area may be used for the dual purpose ofproducing forage for cattle grazing and harvesting grain, but breeding ofcultivars likely occurred in an environment managed for grain production.We tested the hypothesis that genetic improvements accrued over time inagronomic performance may be compromised, or be differentiallyexpressed, in a forage-plus-grain system compared to the grain-only systemunder which improvement was initially targeted. Two field experimentswere conducted in each of three years, employing managementcomponents appropriate to each system, and using a historical set of 12cultivars chosen for their widespread adoption in the region. Substantialgenetic improvement has occurred in hard red winter wheat yield, withoutadverse effects on test weight or grain protein content. The magnitude ofgenetic gain was higher in the grain-only management system under whichthese cultivars were originally selected. In two of the three years, we foundno significant trend for improvement in grain yield under the dual-purposesystem, prompting an expansion of our breeding objectives to incorporateselection pressure for dual-purpose adaptation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Epplin, F.M., 1997. Wheat yield response to changes in production practices induced by programprovisions. J Agr Res Econ 22: 333–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epplin, F.M. & T.F. Peeper, 1998. Influence of planting dateand environment on Oklahoma wheat grain yield trend from 1963 to 1995. Can J Plant Sci 78: 71–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epplin, F.M.,R.R. True & E.G. Krenzer, 1998. Practices used by Oklahoma wheat growers by region. Okla Current Farm Econ 71(1): 14–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krenzer, Jr., E.G., A.R. Tarrant, D.J. Bernardo & G.W. Horn, 1996. An economicevaluation of wheat cultivars based on grain and forage production. J Prod Agric 9: 66–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krenzer, Jr., E.G.,J.D. Thompson & B.F. Carver, 1992. Partitioning of genotype × environment interactions of winter wheat forage yield. Crop Sci 32: 1143–1147.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKown, C.T. & B.F. Carver, 1999. Source-sink interactions of wheatcultivars used for grazing and grain production. Agron Abst p. 151.

  • Ud-Din, N., B.F. Carver & E.G. Krenzer,Jr., 1993. Visual selection for forage yield in winter wheat. Crop Sci 33: 41–45.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carver, B., Khalil, I., Krenzer, E. et al. Breeding winter wheat for a dual-purpose management system. Euphytica 119, 231–234 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017543800311

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017543800311

Navigation