Abstract
We examined the relationships between mesohabitat heterogeneity and benthic macroinvertebrate assemblages in a fourth-order stream (Mortagne, North-Eastern France). The heterogeneity of the mesohabitat mosaic was described around each sampling point for eight different surfaces from 0.5 to 4 m radius. Environmental descriptors integrated both the composition and configuration heterogeneity of the substrate mosaic. Faunal data were analysed in terms of biocenotic indices and taxonomic composition. The maximum number of significant Spearman correlations was obtained for a mosaic with a diameter of 2 m around the sampling point and significant correlations were both the highest and the most numerous for this surface. Relationships were established between community structure and substrate heterogeneity. The faunal richness was higher in a heterogeneous environment composed of numerous substrates, an elevated patchiness and with high perimeters. Such a mosaic potentially offers a great number of niches for invertebrates. A reduced distance between two types of substrate favours exchange of species. At the opposite, a very homogeneous mosaic offers a low variety of niches and shelters fewer taxa. Furthermore, in a homogeneous environment we observed that one or two particular taxa dominated the community, probably because competition with taxa coming from neighbouring patches was reduced. The community composition mainly depended on the characteristics of the mesohabitat sampled. Our results showed that the neighbouring environment around such mesohabitats also had a significant influence. Further research must be conducted to specify the influence of the mosaic heterogeneity on biological and ecological traits of invertebrates.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Armitage, P. D. & C. E. Cannan, 1998. Nested multi-scale surveys in lotic systems-tools for management. In: Bretschko, G. & J. Helesic (eds), Advances in River Bottom Ecology. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, The Netherlands: 293–314.
Armitage, P. D. & I. Pardo, 1995. Impact assessment of regulation at the reach level using macroinvertebrate information from mesohabitats. Reg. Riv. 10: 147–158.
Armitage, P. D., I. Pardo & A. Brown, 1995. Temporal constancy of faunal assemblages in 'mesohabitats'-application to management? Arch. Hydrobiol. 133: 367–383.
Beisel, J. N., 1996. Microrépartition des invertébrés benthiques en eau courante: caractéristiques des microhabitats et organisation de leurs peuplements. Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. Metz: 259 pp.
Beisel, J.-N., P. Usseglio-Polatera, S. Thomas, S. & J. C. Moreteau, 1998a. A method to describe substrate heterogeneity at a microhabitat scale. First results on relationships with the macroinvertebrate community structure. In: Bretschko, G. & J. Helesic (eds), Advances in River Bottom Ecology. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, The Netherlands: 39–46.
Beisel, J.-N., P. Usseglio-Polatera, S. Thomas & J. C. Moreteau, 1998b. Stream community structure in relation to spatial variation: the influence of mesohabitat characteristics. Hydrobiologia 389: 73–88.
Chutter, F. M., 1969. The distribution of some stream invertebrates in relation to current speed. Int. Rev. ges Hydrobiol. 54: 413–422.
Dobson, M. & A. G. Hildrew, 1992. A test of resource limitation among shredding detritivores in low order streams in southern England. J. anim. Ecol. 61: 69–77.
Doeg, T. J., R. Marchant, M. Douglas & P. S. Lake, 1989. Experimental colonization of sand, gravel and stones by macroinvertebrates in the Acheron River, southeastern Australia. Freshwat. Biol. 22: 57–64.
Drake, J. A., 1984. Species aggregation: the influence of detritus in a benthic invertebrate community. Hydrobiologia 112: 109–115.
Harper, D. M. & M. Everard, in press. Why should the habitat-level approach underpin holistic river survey and management? Aquatic Conservation.
Harper, D. M., C. D. Smith & P. J. Barham, 1992. Habitats as the building blocks for river conservation assessment. In: Boon, P. J., P. Calow & G. E. Petts (eds), River Conservation and Management. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester: 311–319.
Hildrew, A. G., 1998. Physical habitat and the benthic ecology of streams and rivers. In: Bretschko, G. & J. Helesic (eds), Advances in River Bottom Ecology. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, The Netherlands: 13–22.
Li, H. & J. F. Reynolds, 1994. A simulation experiment to quantify spatial heterogeneity in categorical maps. Ecology 75: 2446–2455.
Li, H. & J. F. Reynolds, 1995. On definition and quantification of heterogeneity. Oikos 73: 280–284.
Minshall, G. W., 1988. Stream ecosystem theory: a global perspective. J. n. am. Benthol. Soc. 7: 263–288.
Minshall, G. W. & J. N. Minshall, 1977. Microdistribution of benthic invertebrates in a rocky mountain (U.S.A.) stream. Hydrobiologia 55: 231–249.
Minshall, G. W. & C. T. Robinson, 1998. Macroinvertebrate community structure in relation to measures of lotic habitat heterogeneity. Arch. Hydrobiol. 141: 129–151.
Oertli, B., 1992. L'influence de trois substrats (Typha, Chara, feuilles mortes) d'un étang forestier sur la densité, la biomasse et la production des macroinvertébrés aquatiques. Dissertation No. 2557. Université de Genève, Genève, 283 pp.
Reice, S. R., 1980. The role of substratum in benthic macroinvertebrate microdistribution and litter decomposition in a woodland stream. Ecology 61: 580–590.
Statzner, B., J. A. Gore & V. H. Resh, 1988. Hydraulic stream ecology: observed patterns and potential applications. J. n. am. Benthol. Soc. 7: 307–360.
Wood, P., 1998. Reach-scale mesohabitat variations in a small chalk stream under low flow conditions. In: Bretschko, G. & J. Helesic (eds), Advances in River Bottom Ecology. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, The Netherlands: 31–38.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Beisel, JN., Usseglio-Polatera, P. & Moreteau, JC. The spatial heterogeneity of a river bottom: a key factor determining macroinvertebrate communities. Hydrobiologia 422, 163–171 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017094606335
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017094606335