Skip to main content
Log in

Gelidium robustum agar: quality characteristics from exploited beds and seasonality from an unexploited bed at Southern Baja California, México

  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The yield and gel properties of agar from Gelidium robustum, harvested in Baja California for industrial production is affected by season of collection and epiphyte loading. The alga is epiphytized to various extents by the bryozoan Membraniphora tuberculata ('conchilla') and the resulting calcareous crust on the alga diminishes the price of the seaweed biomass. Classification of the algal biomass quality by the agar industry is based on the apparent 'conchilla' content from visual examination. The different quality classes can be categorized quantitatively into premium class (30–40% w/w of 'conchilla' load), 2nd class (∼ 50% w/w) and 3rd class (> 60% w/w). For samples collected at two exploited beds, the biomass obtained from Bahía de Tortugas had a lower epiphytic coverage than that from Bahía Asunción. The agar yield from different quality classes of G. robustum was strongly affected by the bryozoan epiph ytic coverage, while its gel characteristics were not. Algae collected at Punta Prieta, an unexploited bed not affected by 'conchilla', showed seasonality in agar yield. It ranged between 17.5 and 44.2% with two maximum values observed, one in summer and the other in winter. Gel strength ranged between 515 and 665 g cm−2, reaching a maximum during autumn.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Armisén, R. & F. Galatas, 1987. Production, properties and uses of agar. In McHugh, D. J. (ed.), Production and Utilization of Products from Commercial Seaweeds. FAO Fish. Tech. Pap. 288: 1–57.

  • Barilotti, C. D. & W. Silverthorne, 1972. A resource management study of Gelidium robustum. Proc. int. Seaweed Symp. 7: 255–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bird, K. T., M. D. Hanisak & J. Ryther, 1981. Chemical quality and production of agars extracted from Gracilaria tikvahiaegrown in different nitrogen enrichment conditions. Bot. mar. 24: 441–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cancino, J. M., J. Muñoz, M. Muñoz & M. C. Orellana, 1987. Effects of the bryozoan Membraniphora tuberculata(Bosc.) on the photosynthesis and growth of Gelidium rexSantelices et Abbott. J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 113: 105–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casas-Valdez, M. M. & C. Fajardo, 1990. Análisis preliminar de la explotación de Gelidium robustum(Gardner) Hollenberg et Abbott en Baja California Sur, México. Inv. Mar. CICIMAR 5(1): 83–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, G. L. & G. R. Johnstone, 1944. The seasonal production of agar in Gelidium cartilagineuma perennial red alga. Am. J. Bot. 31: 638–640.

    Google Scholar 

  • Espinoza, J. & H. Rodríguez, 1992. Rendimiento y fuerza de gel de Gelidium robustum(Gelidiales, Rhodophyta) de la parte central de la península de Baja California. Rev. Inv. Cient. 3: 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freile-Pelegrín, Y., D. Robledo & G. García-Reina, 1995. Seasonal agar yield in Gelidium canariensis(Grunow) Seoane-Camba (Gelidiales, Rhodophyta) from Gran Canaria, Spain. J. appl. Phycol. 7: 141–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freile-Pelegrín, Y., D. Robledo, R. Armisén & G. García-Reina, 1996. Seasonal changes in agar characteristics of two populations of Pterocladia capillaceain Gran Canaria, Spain. J. appl. Phycol. 8: 236–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • García, I., 1988. Estudio de la variación estacional de la calidad y el rendimiento del agar obtenido del alga roja Gelidium sesquipedale(Clem.) Born. et Thur. en la costa guipuzcoana (N. de España). Inf. Tecn. Inv. Pesq. 146: 3–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guzmán del Próo, S. & S. De la Campa Guzmán, 1979. Gelidium robustum(Florideophyceae), an agarophyte of Baja California, México. Proc. int. Seaweed Symp. 9: 303–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • McHugh, D. J., 1991. Worldwide distribution of commercial resources of seaweeds including Gelidium. Hydrobiologia 221: 19–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouradi-Givernaud, A., T. Givernaud, H. Morvan & J. Cosson, 1992. Agar from Gelidium latifolium(Rhodophyceae, Gelidiales): biochemical composition and seasonal variations. Bot. mar. 35: 153–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Onraët, A. C. & B. L. Robertson, 1987, Seasonal variation in yield and properties of agar from sporophytic and gametophytic phases of Onikusa pristoides(Turner) Akatsuka (Gelidiaceae, Rhodophyta). Bot. mar. 30: 491–495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robledo, D., 1998. Seaweed resources from Mexico. In Critchley, A. & M. Ohno (eds), Seaweed Resources of the World, JICA, Nagai, Yokosuka, Japan: 331–342.

  • Santelices, B., 1988. Synopsis of biological data of the seaweed genera Gelidiumand Pterocladia(Rhodophyta). FAO Fish. Synops. 145, 55 pp.

  • Torres, M., F. X. Niell & P. Algarra, 1991. Photosynthesis of Gelidium sesquipedale: effects of temperature and light on pigment concentration, C/N ratio and cell wall polysaccharides. Hydrobiologia 221: 77–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zertuche-González, J., 1993. Situación actual de la industria de las algas marinas productoras de ficocoloides en México. In Zertuche-González, J. A. (ed.), Situación Actual de la Industria de Macroalgas Productoras de Ficocoloides en América Latina y el Caribe. D. C. No. 13. FAO-AQUILA, Mexico DF, Mexico: 33–37.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Freile-Pelegrín, Y., Robledo, D. & Serviere-Zaragoza, E. Gelidium robustum agar: quality characteristics from exploited beds and seasonality from an unexploited bed at Southern Baja California, México. Hydrobiologia 398, 501–507 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017029915910

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017029915910

Navigation