Skip to main content
Log in

Desolvation Energy: A Major Determinant of Absorption, But Not Clearance, of Peptides in Rats

  • Published:
Pharmaceutical Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The oral delivery of peptidic drugs is problematic because of their degradation in the gastrointestinal tract and low absorption through the intestinal mucosa. Earlier in vitro studies with two series of digestion-resistant, radiolabeled peptides that varied in physical properties (molecular weight, lipophilicity, and hydrogen bonding sites) had suggested that intestinal transport of these peptides was most influenced by the number of hydrogen bonding sites, the major determinant of desolvation energy. To determine whether this correlation could be confirmed in vivo, intestinal absorption was determined by comparing the biliary and urinary recovery of these radiolabeled peptides in rats given intravenous or intraduodenal doses. Absorption was inversely correlated to the number of calculated hydrogen bonding sites for the model peptides, similar to what had been found in vitro. Clearance by liver and kidneys appeared to be unaffected by desolvation energy but was well correlated with lipophilicity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. W. D. Stein. The Movement of Molecules Across Cell Membranes, Academic Press, New York, 1967, pp. 65–91.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. M. Diamond and E. M. Wright. Molecular forces governing nonelectrolyte permeation through cell membranes. Proc. Roy. Soc. B 172:273–316 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. A. Conradi, A. R. Hilgers, N. F. H. Ho and P. S. Burton. The influence of peptide structure on transport across epithelial cells I. Pharm. Res., 8:1453–1460 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. Leo, C. Hansch, and D. Elkins. Partition coefficients and their uses. Chem. Rev. 71:526–616 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  5. V. Austel and E. Kutter. In J. G. Topless (ed.), Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships of Drugs, Academic Press, New York, 1983, pp. 437–496.

    Google Scholar 

  6. K. R. Buttleworth and D. Pelley. Mesenteric venous blood sampling in vivo in the rat. J. Physiol. 232:60P–61P (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. R. Weeks and J. D. Daves. Chronic intravenous cannulas for rats. J. Appl. Physiol. 19:540–541 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  8. P. R. Bevington. Data Reduction and Error Analysis for the Physical Sciences, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1968, p. 56.

    Google Scholar 

  9. G. Maurer. Metabolism of cyclosporine. Transplant. Proc. 17 (Suppl. 1):19–26 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  10. G. G. Nys and R. F. Rekker. The concept of hydrophobic fragmental constants (f-values). II. Extension of its applicability to the calculation of lipophilicities of aromatic and heteroaromatic structures. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 9:361–375 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  11. D. W. Powell. Barrier function of epithelia. Am. J. Physiol. 241:G275–G288 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  12. I. J. Hidalgo, T. J. Raub, and R. T. Borchardt. Characterization of the human colon carcinoma cell line (Caco-2) as a model system for intestinal epithelial permeability. Gastroenterology 96:736–749 (1989).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Karls, M.S., Rush, B.D., Wilkinson, K.F. et al. Desolvation Energy: A Major Determinant of Absorption, But Not Clearance, of Peptides in Rats. Pharm Res 8, 1477–1481 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015882030289

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015882030289

Navigation