Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Area Networks for Conserving Iberian Insects: A Case Study of Dung Beetles (col., Scarabaeoidea)

  • Published:
Journal of Insect Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Possibilities to create an efficient network of areas for the conservation of Iberian dung-beetle biodiversity were investigated. Data were taken from ‘BANDASCA’, a 15,740 record dung-beetle database with information for 101,996 specimens. The greatest species richness and phylogenetic diversity are found in the Iberian Central System cordilleras, while those of range-size rarity are in the southernmost corner of the Iberian Peninsula and in the coastal plains of the Guadalquivir basin. Additionally, broad regional score trends of these variables reach a maximum in a smaller northeastern, and a larger southeastern region (Baetic and sub-Baetic mountains). Major Central and Southern Spain dung-beetle hotspots contain many of the UTM grid cells which delimit the near-minimum-set of areas hosting maximum dung-beetle biodiversity scores. They are viewed as the nucleus of a potential network of reserves. A UTM grid cell (30TXK1) where Onthophagus albarracinus, an endemic and demographically rare species inhabits the Sierra of Albarracín and ‘Montes Universales’, was detected as an irreplaceable area. Because of recent land use changes and rapid human-induced habitat transformation threatening dung-beetle fauna, caution should be taken not to recommend an in memoriam network of areas no longer hosting a fauna extinct today. The abandoning of traditional herding management in Europe threatens the preservation of grasslands where dung-feeding beetles play a major ecological role in maintaining pasture quality and livestock health. A return to more traditional herding methods would require stable dung-beetle populations. Any insect conservation planning in Spain would benefit from more biogeographical information for other insect groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AraÚjo, M.B. and Williams, P.H. (2000) Selecting areas for species persistence from occurrence data. Biol. Conserv. 96, 331-45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balmford, A. (1998) On hotspots and the use of indicators for reserve selection. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13, 409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balleto, E. and Casale, A. (1991) Mediterranean insect conservation. In The conservation of insects and their habitats(N.M. Collins and J.A. Thomas, eds), pp. 121-40. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbero, E., Palestrini, C. and Roggero, A. (1998) Phylogenetic relationships in the genus ScarabaeusLinnaeus (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae, Scarabaeinae). Mem. Mus. Civ. St. Nat. Vevona 13, 87-95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbero, E., Palestrini, C. and Rolando, A. (1999) Dung beetle conservation: effects of habitat and resource selection (Coleoptera: Scarabaeoidea). J. Insect Conserv. 3, 75-84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borges, P.A.V., Serrano, A.R. and Quartau, J.A. (2000) Ranking the Azorean Natural Forest Reserves for conservation using their endemic arthropods. J. Insect Conserv. 4, 129-47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bornemissza, G.F. (1970) Insectary studies on the control of dung breeding flies by the activity of the dung beetle Onthophagus gazellaF. (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). J. Austr. Entomol. Soc. 9, 31-41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bornemissza, G.F. and Williams, C.H. (1970) An effect on dung beetle activity on plant yield. Pedobiologia, 10, 1-7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, B.W. (1999) Preserving genes, species, or ecosystems? Healing the fractured foundations of conservation policy. Mol. Ecol. 8, S5-S10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cambefort, Y. (1995) Deux nouvelles espèces du genre NeonitisPéringuey, 1901, et note sur la phylogénie et la biogéographie des Onitini (Coloeptera, Scarabaeidae). Rev. franç. d'Entom. 17(2), 41-8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cambefort, Y. (1996) Une nouvelle sespèce afro-tropicale d'EuoniticellusJanssens, 1953, avec une phylogénie du genre (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae). Rev. franç. d'Entom. 18(3), 115-9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cambefort, Y. (1997) Food choice and environment occupancy in Afrotropical dung beetles: a phylogenetic study of two examples (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae). In The Origin of Biodiversity in Insects: Phylogenetic Tests of Evolutionary Scenarios. (Ph. Grandcolas, ed), pp. 125-34. Mémoires du Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle de Paris. Tome 173 Zoologie. Paris.

  • Caughley, G. (1994) Directions in conservation biology. J. Anim. Ecol. 63, 215-44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colwell, R.K. (1997) Estimates, statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples. Version 5. User's Guide and application, pp. 1-23. Published at http://viceroy.eeb.uconn.edu/estimates.

  • Colwell, R.K. and Coddington, J.A. (1995) Estimating terrestrial biodiversity through extrapolation. In Biodiversity, measurement and estimation(D.L. Hawksworth, ed), pp. 101-18. London: Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csuti, B., Polasky, S., Williams, P.H., Pressey, R.L., Camm, J.D., Kershaw, M., Kiester, A.R., Downs, B., Hamilton, R., Huso M. and Sahr, K. (1997) A comparison of reserve selection algorithms using data on terrestrial vertebrates in Oregon. Biol. Conserv. 80, 83-97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis, R.L.H. and Hardy, P.B. (1999) Targeting squares for survey: predicting species richness and incidence of species for a butterfly atlas. Global. Ecol. Biogeogr. 8, 443-54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faith, D.P. (1992a). Conservation evaluation and phylogenetic diversity. Biol. Conserv. 61, 1-10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faith, D.P. (1992b). Systematics and conservation: on predicting the feature diversity of subsets of taxa. Cladistics. 8, 361-73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faith, D.P. (1995). Phylogenetic pattern and the quantification of organismal biodiversity. In Biodiversity, measurement and estimation(D.L. Hawksworth, ed), pp. 45-8. London: Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faith, D.P. and Walker, P.A. (1993) DIVERSITY: reference and User's guide. CSIRO Divison of Wildlife and Ecology, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farris, J.S. (1988) HENNIG86 Reference. Versión 1.5 Copyright (c) James J. Farris, Manual, 17 pp.

  • Favila, M.E. and Halffter, G. (1997) The use of indicator groups for measuring biodiversity as related to community structure and function. Acta Zool. Mex.(n.s.) 72, 1-25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fincher, G.T. (1975) Effect on dung beetle activity on the number of nematode parasitoid required by grazing cattle. J. Parasitol. 61, 759-62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fincher, G.T. (1981) The potential value of dung beetles in pasture ecosystems. J. Georgia Entom. Soc. 16, 316-33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaston, K.J. (2000) Global patterns in biodiversity. Nature 405, 220-7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halffter, G. (1998) A strategy for measuring landscape biodiversity. Biol. Int. 36, 3-17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halffter, G. and Favila, M.E. (1993) The Scarabaeinae (Insecta: Coleoptera), an animal group for analyzing, inventoring and monitoring biodiversity in tropical rainforest and modified landscapes. Biol. Int. 27, 15-21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hortal-Muñoz, J., Martín-Piera, F. and Lobo, J.M. (2000) Dung beetle geographic diversity variation along a Western Iberian latitudinal transect (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 93(2), 235-43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hortal-Muñoz, J., Lobo, J.M. and Martín-Piera, F. (2001) Forecasting insect species richness scores in poorly surveyed territories: the case of the Portuguese dung beetles (Col., Scarabaeinae). Biodiversity Conserv. 10, 1343-67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, P.C., Viskaniç P., Davenport, T.R.B., Kigenyi, F.W., Baltzer, M., Dickinson, C.J., Lwanga, J.S., Matthews, R.A. and Balformd, A. (1998) Complementarity and the use of indicator groups for reserve selection in Uganda. Nature 394, 472-5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphries, C.J., Williams, P.H. and Vane-Wright, R.I. (1995) Measuring biodiversity value for conservation. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 26, 93-111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitching, R. (2000). Biodiversity, hotspots and defiance. Trends Ecol. Evol. 15, 484-5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, B.C. (1989) Effects of forest fragmentation on dung and carrion beetle communities in Central Amazonia. Ecology, 70, 1715-25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, J.B. (1983) An iterative method for establishing priorities for the selection of nature reserves: an example from Tasmania. Biol. Conserv. 25, 127-34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lobo, J.M. (2001) Decline of roller populations on the Iberian Peninsula during 20th Century. Biol. Conserv. 97, 43-50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lobo, J.M. and Martín-Piera, F. (1991) La creación de un banco de datos zoológico sobre los Scarabaeidae (Coleoptera, Scarabaeoidea) Ibero-Baleares: una experiencia piloto. Elytron 5, 31-8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lobo, J. and Martín-Piera, F. (1993) A zoological database of Ibero-Balearic Scarabaeidae (Coleoptera: Scarabaeoidea): A preliminary experiment. Proceed. Int. Symp. and First World Congress on Preserv. and Conserv of Natural History Collection 1, 285-92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lobo, J.M. and Martín-Piera, F. (1999). Between-group differences in the Iberian dung beetle species-area relationship (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Acta Oecol. 20, 587-97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lobo, J.M. and Martín-Piera, F. (in press) Searching for a predictive model for Iberian dung beetle species richness (Col., Scarabaeinae) using spatial and environmental variables. Conserv. Biol.

  • Lobo, J.M., Lumaret, J.P. and Jay-Robert, P. (1997) Les Atlas faunistisques comme outils d'analyse spatiale de la biodiversité. Annal. Soc. Entom. Fran. 33, 129-38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lobo, J.M., Sanmartín, I. and Martín-Piera, F. (1997) Diversity and spatial turnover of dung beetle (Coleoptera, Scarabaeoidea) communities in a protected area of South Europe (Doñana National Park, Huelva, Spain). Elytron 11, 71-88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lumaret, J.P. (1986) Toxicité de certains helminthicides vis-a-vis des insectes coprophages et conséquences sur la disparition des excréments de la surface du sol. Acta Oecol. Oecol. Appl. 7, 313-24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lumaret, J.P. 1994. La conservation de l'entomofaune dans les aires naturelles protégées. In Environmental management and arthropod conservation(R. Jiménez-Peydró and M.A. Marcos-García, eds), pp. 57-65. Asociación Española de Entomología, Valencia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lumaret, J.P., Galante, E., Lumbreras, C., Mena, J., Bertrand, M., Bernal, J.L., Cooper, J.L., Kadiri, N. and Crowe, D. (1993) Fields effects of ivermectin residues on dung beetles. J. Appl. Ecol. 30, 428-36.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacQueen, A. (1975) Dung as insect food source: Dung beetle as competitors of other coprophagous fauna and as targets for predators. J. Appl. Ecol. 12, 821-7.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacQueen, A. and Beirne, B.P. (1975) Influence of other insects on production of horn fly, Haematobia irritans (Diptera: Muscidae) from cattle dung in south-central British Columbia. Canad. J. Plant Sci. 107, 1255-64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margules, C.R, Nicholls, A.O. and Pressey, R.L. (1988) Selecting networks of reserves to maximise biological diversity. Biol. Conserv. 43, 63-76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martín, J. and Gurrea, P. (1999) EsÁreas de especiación en España y Portugal. Bol. Asoc. esp. Entom. 23, 83-103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martín-Piera, F. (1987) Review of the genus ChironitisLansberge, 1875, I: taxonomy, phylogeny and zoogeography of the Palaearctic species. Entomol. Arb. Mus. Frey, 35/36, 203-45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martín-Piera, F. (1995) Congruencia Taxonómica y Clasificaciones. Bol. Asoc. esp. Entom. 19, 69-79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martín-Piera, F. (2000) Familia Scarabaeidae. In Coleoptera Scarabaeoidea I. Fauna Ibérica, vol 14. (M.A. Ramos et al., eds), pp. 204-432. Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales CSIÇ Madrid.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martín-Piera, F. and Lobo, J.M. (1995) Diversity and ecological role of dung beetles in Iberian grassland biomes. In Farming on the Edge: the Nature of Traditional Farmland in Europe(D.I. McCracken, E.M. Bignal and S.E. Wenlock, eds), pp. 147-53. Joint Nature Conservation Committee, Peterborough.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martín-Piera, F. and Lobo, J.M. (2000). Diagnóstico sobre el conocimiento sistemático y biogeográfico de tres órdenes de insectos hiperdiversos en España: Coleoptera, Hymenoptera y Lepidoptera. In Hacia un Proyecto CYTED para el Inventario y Estimación de la Diversidad Biológica en Iberoamérica. PrIBES-2000(F. Martín-Piera, J.J. Morrone and A. Melic, eds), pp. 287-308. m3m-Monografías Tercer Milenio. Sociedad entomológica aragonesa (SEA), Zaragoza.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martín-Piera, F. and Lobo, J.M. (in press). Database records as a sampling-effort surrogate to predict spatial distribution of insects in either poorly or unevenly surveyed areas. Acta Entom. Ibér. Macaron.

  • Montreuil, O. (1998) Analyse phylogénétique et paraphylie des Coprini et Dichotomini (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Scénario Biogéographique. Annal. Soc. Entomol. Fran. 34, 135-48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, H.J. (1988) Threatened biotas: ‘hot spots’ in tropical forests. The Environmentalist 8, 187-208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, H.J. (1990) The biodiversity challenge: expanded hot-spots analysis. The Environmentalist 10, 243-56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, N., Mittermeir, R.A., Mittermeir, C.G., da Fonseca, G.A.B. and Kent, J. (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403, 853-8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noss, R.F. (1990) Indicators for monitoring biodiversity: a hierarchical approach. Conserv. Biol. 4, 355-64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, D.L. and Cassola, F. (1992) World-wide species richness patterns of tiger beetles (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae): indicator taxon for biodiversity and conservation studies. Conserv. Biol. 6, 376-91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pressey, R.L., Humphries, C.J., Margules, C.R., Vane-Wright, R.I. and Williams, P.H. (1993) Beyond oportunistim: key principles for systematic reserve selection. Trends Ecol. Evol. 8, 124-8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prendergast, J., Quinn, R.M., Lawton, J.H., Eversham B.C. and Gibbons, D.W. (1993a). Rare species, the coincidence of diversity hotspots and conservation strategies. Nature 365, 335-7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prendergast, J.R., Wood, S.N., Lawton, J.H. and Eversham, B.C. (1993b) Correcting for variation in recording effort in analyses of diversity hotspots. Biodivers. Lett. 1, 39-53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pressey, R.L., Johnson, I.R. and Wilson. P.D. (1994) Shades of irreplaceability: towards a measure of the contribution of sites to a reservation goal. Biodivers. Conserv. 3, 242-62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, W.V. (1994) Setting objectives for conservation evaluation. In Systematics and conservation evaluation(P.L. Forey, C.J. Humphries and R.I. Vane-Wright, eds), pp. 1-13. Systematics Association Special vol. 50, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 438 pp. The Systematics Association 1994. Reprinted 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, W.V. (1998) Biodiversity hotspots. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13, 275-80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reyers, B., van Jaarsveld, A.S. and Krüger, M. (2000) Complementarity as a biodiversity indicator strategy. Proc. R. Soc. LondonB 267, 505-13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohde, K., Heap, M. and Heap, D. (1993) Rapoport's rule does not apply to marine teleosts and cannot explain latitudinal gradients in species richness. Amer. Nat. 142, 1-16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rougon, D., Rougon, C., Trichet, J. and Levieux J. (1988) Enrichissement en matipre organique d'un sol sahÚlien au Niger par les insectes coprophages (Coléoptères: Scarabaeidae): implications agronomiques. Rev. d'Ecol. Biol. du Sol. 25, 413-34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, K. (1996) Rare habitats vie for protection. Science 274, 916-8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Rensburg, B., McGeoch, M.A., Chown, S.L. and Van Jaarsveld, A.S. (1999) Conservation of heterogeneity among dung beetles in the Maputaland centre of endemism, South Africa. Biol. Conserv. 88, 145-53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vane-Wright, R.I. (1996). Identifying priorities for the conservation of biodiversity: systematic biological criteria within a sociopolitical framework. In Biodiversity. A biology of numbers and difference(K.J. Gaston, ed), pp. 309-38. Oxford: Blackwell Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vane-Wright, R.I., Humphries, C.J. and Williams, P.H. (1991) What to protect?-Systematics and the agony of a choice. Biol. Conserv. 55, 235-54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Virolainen, K.M., Ahlroth, P., Hyvõrinen, E., Korkeamõki, E., Mattila, J., Põivinen, J., Rintala, T., Suomi, T. and Suhonen, J. (2000) Hot spots, indicator taxa, complementarity and optimal networks of taiga. Proc. R. Soc. LondonB 267, 1143-7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, P.A. and Faith, D.P. (1995). Diversity-PD: Procedures for conservation evaluation based on phylogenetic diversity. Biodivers. Lett. 2, 132-9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waterhouse, D.F. (1974) The biological control of dung. Sci. Amer. 230, 101-9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, P.H. (1993) Measuring more of biodiversity for choosing conservation areas, using taxonomic relatedness. International Symposium on Biodiversity and Conservation (T.-Y. Moon, ed), pp. 194-227. Korean Entomological Institute (KEI), Seoul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, P.H. (1994) WORLDMAP. Priority Areas for Biodiversity. Version 3. User Guide. 33 pp. Privately distributed by the author.

  • Williams, P.H. (1998) Key sites for conservation: area-selection methods for biodiversity. In Conservation in a changing world(G.M. Mace, A. Balmford and J.R. Ginsberg, eds), pp. 211-49. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, P.H. (2000) WORLDMAP iv WINDOWS: Software and help document 4.20.05. 117 pp. Privately distributed, London.

  • Williams, P. and Gaston, K.J. (1994) Measuring more ‘diversity’: can higher taxon richness predict wholesale species richness?. Biol. Conserv. 67, 211-7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, P. and Gaston, K.J. (1998) Biodiversity indicators: graphical techniques, smoothing and searching for what makes relationships work. Ecography 21, 551-60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, P.H., Vane-Wright, R.I. and Humphries, C.J. (1993) Measuring biodiversity for choosing convervation areas. In Hymenoptera and biodiversity(J. LaSalle and I.D. Gauld, eds), pp. 309-28. Wallingford: CAB International, United Kingdom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, P.H and Humphries, C.J. (1994) Biodiversity, taxonomic relatedness, and endemism in conservation. In Systematics and conservation evaluation(P.L. Forey, C.J. Humphries and R.I. Vane-Wright, eds), pp. 269-87. Systematics Association Special, vol. 50. Oxford: Clarendon Press, The Systematics Association 1994. Reprinted 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, P.H., Gaston, K.J. and Humphries, C.J. (1994) Do conservationists and molecular biologists value differences between organisms in the same way?. Biodivers. Lett. 2, 67-78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, P. Gibbons, D., Margules, C., Rebelo, A., Humphries, C. and Pressey, R. (1996) A comparison of richness hotspots, rarity hotspots and complementarity areas for conserving diversity of British birds. Conserv. Biol. 10, 155-74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zunino, M. (1984) Essai préliminare sur l'évolution des armures génitales des Scarabaeinae, par rapport à la taxonomie du groupe et à l'évolution du comportement de nidification. Bull. Soc. Entomol. Fran. 88, 531-42.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Departamento Biodiversidad y Biología Evolutiva, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (C.S.I.C.), c/ José Gutiérrez Abascal, 2, 28006, Madrid, (Spain

    Fermín Martín-Piera

Authors
  1. Fermín Martín-Piera
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Martín-Piera, F. Area Networks for Conserving Iberian Insects: A Case Study of Dung Beetles (col., Scarabaeoidea). Journal of Insect Conservation 5, 233–252 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013306929014

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013306929014

Search

Navigation