Skip to main content
Log in

HAM: A new epitope-tag for in vivo protein labeling

  • Published:
Molecular Biology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The ability to metabolically label proteins with 35S-methionine is critical for the analysis of protein synthesis and turnover. Despite the importance of this approach, however, efficient labeling of proteins in vivo is often limited by a low number of available methionine residues, or by deleterious side-effects associated with protein overexpression. To overcome these limitations, we have created a methionine-rich variant of the widely used HA tag, called HAM, for use with ectopically expressed proteins. Here we describe the development of a series of vectors, and corresponding antisera, for the expression and detection of HAM-tagged proteins in mammalian cells. We show that the HAM tag dramatically improves the sensitivity of 35S-methionine labeling, and permits the analysis of Myc oncoprotein turnover even when HAM-tagged Myc is expressed at levels comparable to that of the endogenous protein. Because of the improved sensitivity provided by the HAM tag, the vectors and antisera described here should be useful for the analysis of protein synthesis and destruction at physiological levels of protein expression.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. King RW, Deshaies RJ, Peters JM & Kirschmer MW (1996) Science 274: 1652–1659.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Loda M, Cukor B, Tam SW, Lavin P, Fiorentino M, Draetta GF, Jessup JM & Pagano M (1997) Nat. Med. 3: 231–234.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Maxwell PH, Wisener MS, Chang GW, Clifford SC, Vaux EC, Cockman ME, Wykoff CC, Pugh CW, Maher ER & Ratcliffe PJ (1999) Nature 399: 271–275.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Salghetti SE, Kim SY & Tansey WP (1999) Embo J. 18: 717–726.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Yeargin J & Haas M (1995) Curr. Biol. 5: 423–431.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Niman HL, Houghten RA, Walker LE, Reisfeld RA, Wilson IA, Hogle JM & Lerner RA (1983) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 80: 4949–4953.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Tanaka M. & Herr W (1990) Cell 60: 375–386.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Morgenstern JP & Land H (1990) Nucl. Acids Res. 18: 3587–3596.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rudolf C, Adam G & Simm A (1999) Anal. Biochem. 269: 66–71.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hannon GJ, Sun P, Carnero A, Xie LY, Maestro R, Conklin DS & Beach D (1999) Science 283: 1129–1130.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tanaka M, Lai JS & Herr W (1992) Cell 68: 755–767.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wilson IA, Niman HL, Houghten RA, Cherenson AR, Connolly ML & Lerner RA (1984) Cell 37: 767–778.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Henriksson M & Luscher B (1996) Adv. Cancer Res. 68: 109–182.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Herbst, A., Tansey, W.P. HAM: A new epitope-tag for in vivo protein labeling. Mol Biol Rep 27, 203–208 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011008018565

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011008018565

Navigation