Skip to main content
Log in

What makes a scientific article influential? The case of demographers

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we examine, by means of a citation analysis, which factors influence the impactof articles published in demography journals between 1990 and 1992. Several quantifiablecharacteristics of the articles (characteristics with respect to authors, visibility, content andjournals) are strongly related to their subsequent impact in the social sciences. Articles are mostfrequently cited when they deal with empirical, ahistorical research focusing on populations in thedeveloped world, when they are prominently placed in a journal issue, when they are written inEnglish and when they appear in core demography journals. Furthermore, although eminentscholars are likely to be cited on the basis of their reputation, the effect of reputation appears to besmall in demography.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allison, P. D. (1978), The reliability of variables measured as the number of events in an interval of time, In: K. F. Schuessler (Ed.), Sociological Methodology, San Francisco, Jossey-Bass Publishers, pp. 238-253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allison, P. D., J. S. Long (1990), Departmental effects on scientific productivity, American Sociological Review, 55: 469-478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, A. B., A. Baselevsky, D. P. J. Hume (1983), Missing data: A review of the literature, In: P. H. Rossi, J. D. Wright, A. B. Anderson (Eds), Handbook of Survey Research, New York, Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archibald, R. B., D. H. Finifter (1990), Multivariate citation functions and journal rankings, Eastern Economic Journal, 16: 151-158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldi, S. (1998), Normative versus social constructivist processes in the allocation of citations: A networkanalytic model, American Sociological Review, 63: 829-846.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayer, A. E. (1982), A bibliometric analysis of marriage and family literature, Journal of Marriage and the Family, 44: 527-538.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayer, A. E., J. F. Folger (1966). Some correlates of a citation measure of productivity in science, Sociology of Education, 39: 381-389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blank, R. (1991), The effects of double-blind versus single-blind reviewing: Experimental evidence from the American Economic Review, American Economic Review, 81: 1041-1067.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, D. C. (1996), Demography and social science, Population Studies, 50: 305-333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clemens, E. S., W. W. Powell, K. Mcilwaine, D. Okamoto (1995), Careers in print: books, journals and scholarly publications, American Journal of Sociology, 101: 433-494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clemente, F. (1973), Early career determinants of research productivity, American Journal of Sociology, 79: 409-419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, J. R., S. Cole (1973), Social Stratification in Science, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, R. A. K., K. H. Chung (1991), Patterns of research output and author concentration in the economics literature, Review of Economics and Statistics, 740-747.

  • Cronin, B. (1984), The Citation ProcessThe Role and Significance of Citations in Scientific Communication, London, Taylor Graham.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, P.A. (1994), Positive feedbacks and research productivity in science: Reopening another black box, in O. Granstrand, (Ed.), Economics of Technology, Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 65-89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demeny, P. (1988), Social science and population policy, Population and Development Review, 14: 451-479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, A. M. (1986), What is a citation worth?, Journal of Human Resources, 21: 200-215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B. S., R. Eichenberger (1993), American and European economics and economists, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9: 185-194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B. S., R. Eichenberger (1997), Economists: First semester, high flyers and UFOs, In: P.A.G. Van Bergeijk et al. (Eds) Economic Science and Practice, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 15-48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, N. (1977), Referencing as persuasion, Social Studies of Science, 7: 112-122.

    Google Scholar 

  • GlÄnzel, W., U. Schoepflin (1995), A bibliometric study of ageing and reception processes of scientific literature, Journal of Information Science, 21: 37-53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenhalgh, S. (1996), The social construction of population science: An intellectual, institutional, and political history of twentieth-century demography, Comparative Studies of Society and History, 38: 26-66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, D. P. (1990), Publishing by-and for?-the numbers, Science, 250: 1331-1332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, D. P. (1991), Research papers: Who is cited now?, Science, 251: p. 25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargens, L. L., W. O. Hagstrom (1982), Scientific consensus and academic status attainment patterns, Sociology of Education, 55: 183-196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargens, L. L., H. Schuman (1990), Citation counts and social comparisons: Scientists' use and evaluation of citation index data, Social Science Research, 19: 205-221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, D. (1991), The ideological origins of the population association of America, Population and Development Review, 17: 1-34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holub, H. W., G. Tappeiner, V. Eberharter (1991), The iron law of important articles, Southern Economic Journal, 58: 317-328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keyfitz, N. (1993), Thirty years of demography and Demography, Demography, 30: 533-549.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1987), Science in ActionHow to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society, Milton Keynes, Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsey, D. (1978), The Scientific Publication System in Social Science, San Francisco, Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lotka, A. J. (1926), The frequency distribution of scientific productivity, Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 16: 317-323.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, R. M. (1997), The scientific wealth of nations, Science, 275: 793-796.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. K. (1957), Priorities in scientific discovery, American Sociological Review, 22: 635-659.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. K. (1968), The Matthew effect in science, Science, 159: 56-63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. K. (1973), The Sociology of Science, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pendlebury, D. A. (1991), Letter, Science, 251: 1410-1411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Portes, A. (1998), Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology, Annual Review of Sociology, 24: 1-24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, D. J. de Solla (1963), Little Science, Big Science, New York, Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, D. J. de Solla (1976), A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 27: 292-306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, C. A. (1997), The rise and fall of uncitedness, College & Research Libraries, 58: 19-29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smart, S., J. J. Waldfogel (1996), A Citation-Based Test for Discrimination at Economics and Finance Journals, NBER Working Paper, no. 5460, Cambridge MA.

  • Stewart, J. A. (1983), Achievement and ascriptive processes in the recognition of scientific articles, Social Forces, 62: 166-184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teachman, J. D., K. Paasch, K. P. Carver (1993), Thirty years of Demography, Demography, 30: 523-532.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tijssen, R. J. W., T. N. Van Leeuwen, B. Verspagen, H. Hollanders (1998), Wetenschaps-en technologie-indicatoren 1998 (transl. 'science and Technology Indicators 1998'), Leiden: DSWO Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dalen, H. P., K. Henkens (1999), How influential are demography journals?, Population and Development Review, 25, 229-251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xie, Y., K. A. Schauman (1998), Sex differences in research productivity: New evidence about an old puzzle, American Sociological Review, 63: 847-870.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, H. (1977), The Scientific EliteNobel Laureates in the United States, New York, Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Van Dalen, H.P., Henkens, K. What makes a scientific article influential? The case of demographers. Scientometrics 50, 455–482 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010510831718

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010510831718

Keywords

Navigation