Skip to main content
Log in

Can Mentoring or Skill Training Reduce Recidivism? Observational Study with Propensity Analysis

  • Published:
Prevention Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We compared juvenile offenders' recidivism following nonrandom assignment to juvenile diversion (JD, n = 137), JD plus skill training (ST, n = 55), or JD plus mentoring (MEN, n = 45). Intake characteristics that distinguished intervention groups were used to calculate assignment propensity scores. After propensity score blocking balanced intake characteristics, ST proved more cost effective than MEN, achieving a 14% relative reduction in recidivism at a savings of $33,600 per hundred youths. In ST, 37% were rearrested 2 years or more after intake, compared to 51% in MEN and 46% in JD. In two of five propensity subclasses, time to first rearrest was longer in ST (M = 767 days) than in MEN (M = 638 days) or JD (M = 619 days). These results argue for an experimental comparison of ST and MEN and for observational studies with propensity analysis when randomization to juvenile justice interventions is infeasible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Achenbach, T. M. (1991). Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist, 4–18, 1991 Profile. Burlington: University of Vermont Department of Psychiatry.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, D. A., Robinson, D., & Balla, M. (1986). Risk principal of case classification and the prevention of residential placements: An outcome evaluation of the Share the Parenting Program. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54, 203–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basta, J. M., & Davidson, W. S. (1988). Treatment of juvenile delinquents: Study outcomes since 1980. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 6, 355–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T., Ward, C. H., Mendelson, M., Mock, J., & Erbaugh, J. (1961). An inventory for measuring depression. Archives of General Psychiatry, 4, 561–571.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blechman, E. A. (1992). Mentors for high-risk minority youth: From effective communication to bicultural competence. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology. 21, 160–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borenstein, M., Rothstein, H., & Cohen, J. (1997). Power and Precision. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (1995). A practical guide to prevention effectiveness: Decision and economic analysis. Atlanta: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochran, W. G., & Rubin, D. B. (1973). Controlling bias in observational studies: A review. Sankhya, A 35, 417–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, M. A. (1998). The monetary value of saving a high-risk youth. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 14, 5–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collett, D. (1994). Modelling Survival Data in Medical Research. New York: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Culhane, S. E., & Blechman, E. A. (1994). Depressive, aggressive, and prosocial coping styles: A case for the comorbidity of adult depression and aggression. Unpublished manuscript, University of Colorado at Boulder.

  • Davidson II, W. S., Redner, R., Blakely, C. H., Mitchell, C. M., & Emshoff, J. G. (1987). Diversion of juvenile offenders: An experimental comparison. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 68–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dembo, R., Turner, G., Chin, C. S., Schmeidler, J., Borden, P., & Manning, D. (1995). Predictors of recidivism to a juvenile assessment center. The International Journal of the Addictions, 30, 1425–1452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dishion, T. J., McCord, J., & Poulin, F. (1999). When interventions harm: Peer groups and problem behavior. American Psychologist, 54, 755–764.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drake, C. (1993). Effects of misspecification of the propensity score on estimators of treatment effect. Biometrics, 49, 1231–1236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, G. J., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (1997). Income effects across the life span: Integration and interpretation. In G. J. Duncan & J. Brooks-Gunn (Eds.), Consequences of growing up poor (pp. 596–610). New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • D'Unger, A. V., Land, K. C., McCall, P., & Nagin, D. S. (1998). How many latent classes of delinquent/criminal careers? Results from mixed Poisson regression analyses. American Journal of Sociology, 103, 1593–1630.

    Google Scholar 

  • French, M. T. (1995). Economic evaluation of drug abuse treatment programs: Methodology and findings. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 21, 111–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • French, M. T., Rachal, J. V., & Hubbard, R. L. (1991). Conceptual framework for estimating the social costs of drug abuse. Journal of Health and Social Policy, 2, 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, J. D., Jenson, J. M., Catalano, R. F., & Wells, E. A. (1991). Effects of a skills training intervention with juvenile delinquents. Research on Social Work Practice, 1, 107–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heien, D. M., & Pittman, D. J. (1993). The external costs of alcohol abuse. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 54, 302–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinsman, D. T., & Shadish, W. R. (1996). Assignment methods in experimentation: When do nonrandomized experiments approximate answers from randomized experiments? Psychological Methods, 1, 154–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kazdin, A. E. (1990). Psychotherapy for children and adolescents. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 21–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kazdin, A. E. (1998). Research Design in Clinical Psychology. New York: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavori, P. W., & Dawson, R. (1998). Developing and comparing treatment strategies: An annotated portfolio of designs. Psychopharmacology Bulletin, 34, 13–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipsey, M. W. (1992). Juvenile delinquency treatment: A metaanalytic inquiry into the variability of effects. In T. D. Cook, H. Cooper, D. S. Cordray, H. Hartmann, L. V. Hedges, R. J. Light, T. A. Louis, & F. Mosteller (Eds.), Meta-analysis for explanation: A casebook (pp. 83–127). New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClellan, M., McNeil, B. J., & Newhouse, J. P. (1994). Does more intensive treatment of acute myocardial infarction in the elderly reduce mortality? Analysis using instrumental variables. Journal of the American Medical Association, 272, 859–866.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCord, J. (1992). The Cambridge-Somerville Study: A pioneering longitudinal experimental study of delinquency prevention. In J. McCord & R. E. Tremblay, Preventing antisocial behavior: Interventions from birth through adolescence (pp. 196–206). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKay, J. R., Alterman, A. I., McLellan, A. T., Boardman, C. R., Mulvaney, F. D., & O'Brien, C. P. (1998). Random versus nonrandom assignment in the evaluation of treatment for cocaine abusers. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 697–701.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mecartney, C. A., Styles, M. B., & Morrow, K.V. (1994). Mentoring in the juvenile justice system: Findings from two pilot programs. Philadelphia: Public/Private Ventures.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moffitt, T. E. (1989). Accommodating self-report methods to a low delinquency culture: A longitudinal study from New Zealand. In M. W. Klein (Ed.), Cross-national research in self-reported crime and delinquency (pp. 43–66). Norwell,MA: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, I. M., Torbet, P. M., Malloy, D. A., Adamcik, L. P., Toner, M. J., & Andrews, J. (October, 1994). What works: Promising interventions in juvenile justice: Program report. Pittsburgh: National Center for Juvenile Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP), U.S. Department of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulvey, E. P., Arthur, M. W., & Reppucci, N. D. (1993). The prevention and treatment of juvenile delinquency: A review of the research. Clinical Psychology Review, 13, 133–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ollendick, T. H. (1996). Violence in youth: Where do we go from here? Behavior therapy's response. Behavior Therapy, 27, 485–514.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, M., Thomas, D., Zamberlan, C., & Caliber Associates (1997). Boot camps for juvenile offenders. Program Summary. Washington, D.C.: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, U.S. Department of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70, 41–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, P.R. & Rubin, D. B. (1984). Reducing bias in observational studies using subclassification on the propensity score. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 79, 516–524.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, D. (1974). Estimating causal effects of treatment in randomized and non-randomized studies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66, 688–701.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sechrest, L. White, S., & Brown, E. (Eds.) (1979). Rehabilitation of criminal offenders: Problems and prospects. Washington, DC: National Research Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slicker, E. K., & Palmer, D. J. (1993). Mentoring at-risk high school students: Evaluation of a school-based program. The School Counselor, 40, 327–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tate, D. C., Reppucci, N. D., & Mulvey, E. P. (1995). Violent juvenile delinquents: Treatment effectiveness and implications for future action. American Psychologist, 50, 777–781.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Justice (1987). Recidivism among young parolees (NCJ-104916). Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics Bulletin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Visher, C. A., Lattimore, P. K., & Linster, R. L. (1991). Predicting the recidivism of serious youthful offenders using survival models. Criminology, 29, 329–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, E. E. (1989). Protective factors and individual resilience. In S. J. Meisels & J. P. Shonkoff (Eds.), Handbook of early intervention: Theory, practice, and analysis (pp. 97–116). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yates, B. (1995). Cost-effectiveness analysis, cost-benefit analysis, and beyond. Evolving models for the scientist-manager-practitioner. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 2, 385–398.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Helberg Consulting

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Blechman, E.A., Maurice, A., Buecker, B. et al. Can Mentoring or Skill Training Reduce Recidivism? Observational Study with Propensity Analysis. Prev Sci 1, 139–155 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010073222476

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010073222476

Navigation